ESET Inspect vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert comparison

ESET and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. ESET is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. ESET holds a 1.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

ESET Inspect and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert are prominent competitors in advanced threat detection. Kaspersky stands out with a more robust feature set, whereas ESET is favored for cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: ESET Inspect provides real-time threat detection, customizable alerts, and network visibility. Kaspersky offers threat intelligence, automated responses, and efficient endpoint detection.

Room for Improvement: ESET could enhance its automation capabilities and threat analysis tools. Kaspersky would benefit from simplifying its deployment process and reducing initial costs to improve accessibility for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ESET offers an intuitive deployment process with responsive support, making it user-friendly. Kaspersky requires comprehensive initial setups but supports operational queries robustly.

Pricing and ROI: ESET is known for competitive pricing and fast ROI due to its lower costs. Kaspersky has higher initial expenses but offers significant long-term ROI with its extensive security features.

To learn more, read our detailed ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET Inspect is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Expert is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert	1.3%
ESET Inspect	1.2%
Other	94.1%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Moshiur-Rahman Khan

CEO at IOPoint.com

Provides reliable and comprehensive internet security solutions without significant system slowdowns

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side, we utilize it on our Windows Server. The platform has improved our organization's security by providing comprehensive antivirus and internet security solutions. It is fast and…

Read full review

Ravi-Upadhyay

Founder at Inspira Enterprise

Provides strong threat detection and response through behavior analytics and network isolation

I have found the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert to be its ability to tackle the biggest challenges customers face when they have to mitigate any kind of a malware, ransomware attack, or online theft scenarios. The solution utilizes its HIPS, which is the host intrusion prevention system, behavior analytics system, and device control mechanism, making the antivirus capabilities of EDR quite strong. It is able to detect zero-day threats as well as historical or legacy malware, providing protection against current threats in the market and legacy malware. My opinion on the advanced threat detection algorithms in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is that the ATP functionality is quite strong because it utilizes the behavioral analytics engine in the backend, which employs machine learning mechanisms to identify any kind of vulnerability or exploit running on the operating system level and the network level. If an attack is about to happen on the endpoint, it is able to protect over the network as well and checks for any illegitimate encryption activities. The machine learning capability within Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has contributed to improving detection accuracy and reducing false positives in my environment by helping me identify malicious activity and differentiate between any malicious activity on the operating system level and on the network level. I have seen customers with in-house developed applications that have no public signatures available. Once I whitelist a particular application, it intelligently whitelists not only the executable but also all the dependent services required to run that application. Furthermore, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has successfully blocked network-level attacks on the endpoint. For example, during a recent DoS attack aimed at choking the entire network, Kaspersky detected the attack, isolated the device in a sandbox network, and alerted my SOC team via email for corrective action, thereby proactively helping me detect and protect devices from malicious attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can use Cortex XDR to get the entire graph of the incidents from source to destination, and we can take remedial action."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"It is an easy-to-use tool."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is its machine-learning capabilities. Additionally, there is full integration with other solutions."

"The tool is designed to scale for large enterprises and handle large volumes of data."

"If any application performs suspicious activities, such as changing registries or modifying other applications, Cortex XDR detects and blocks the entire application."

"If you are looking to deploy a security solution as a whole, this is a good option."

"One thing that I like about Cortex XDR is its ability to detect all the suspicious or malicious binaries, and it can integrate with Palo Alto Firewall."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's most valuable feature is EDR."

"I find the multilayered endpoint security the most valuable feature."

"Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution."

"The product's most valuable features are its performance and stability."

"Rules are the most valuable feature of ESET Inspect. They are created through XML language, and they track and filter events from endpoints. If the event matches the rule, the rule is triggered. Exceptions are the second most valuable feature because it gives you the power to filter false positives in large numbers. The third most valuable feature is the Learning mode that facilitates making exceptions for known processes with a good reputation."

"The rules are the best and most useful features."

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's greatest asset lies in its user-friendly interface, which allows for easy navigation and thorough analysis of incidents."

"This solution is easy to install, setup and monitor."

"This solution is quite responsive and the tech support engineers are kind and good."

"The content filtering options are good."

"It's just running in the background, it doesn't bother us, and we don't even notice it is there, while helping improve security in our organization with good protection on offer."

"The solution does a good job of filtering and blocking unusual traffic."

"The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution."

"In terms of effectiveness, it's the best; it is easy to set up, the product is stable, and we can scale the solution."

"We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pros

Cons

"The only issues that we have are, one the cost, two the dashboard is not very intuitive, even though you can drill down within the dashboard, we usually have to gather information from other sources to determine locations and if its a false positive."

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."

"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a very good product, but financially, it is very expensive, so the company should look into that area."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"The GUI could be improved. It's a little bit cumbersome. It could be more user-friendly."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

"The solution could improve the consumption of resources. The RAM and CPU usage increases during usage which can cause issues. We have three separate services and it would be beneficial if all were executed from one agent limiting the over usage of system resources."

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

"The platform's price could be better."

"Every vendor is working on making the job of SOC analysts easier, with fewer false positives and more precise detections. ESET uses LiveGrid technology that provides feedback on the reputation of files and operations. It's hard to eliminate all of the false positives, but hopefully, we'll see some improvement with the advances in AI."

"One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security."

"The product is complex to configure, and there are too many errors that are not errors, making it an area that can be considered for improvement."

"It may be difficult for a first-time customer to understand all of the functions that are available to him."

"The solution is expensive."

"The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner."

"They could provide a source of visualization for the product."

"The lack of DLP is the main reason that our company is moving away from Kaspersky EDR."

"It is not easy to follow the kill chain of a potential infection or malware."

"The prices can go down a little bit."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response should continue to improve its protection while adapting to the changing threat ecosystems. Having more advanced features would be a benefit."

"The solution could always be more secure."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"This is true in the case of licensing, we do not have the most expensive products, and we don't have the cheapest product, it's somewhere in the middle. Perhaps a little higher from the middle, but we are known for what we provide to our customers, and they are pleased."

"The pricing and licensing are the big issue now, in my opinion. If the price was less than other companies, or a one-time charge for service was available, I think there would be more users of this solution."

"I feel it is a very expensive product."

"The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward."

"The platform is expensive; it could be cheaper."

"The solution's cost is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."

"We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better."

"If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike."

"Endpoint's pricing is good, especially compared to expensive solutions like Sophos."

"The price of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is in the middle range compared to competitors. The pricing model is based on the users using the solutions. The cost for us is approximately 2200 Algerian dinars. The price of the solution could be reduced."

"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."

"The solution is worth its cost so I rate pricing a ten out of ten."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET Inspect?

The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward. We purchase soft keys, install them, and manage the licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET Inspect?

One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Inspect?

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The price of the solution is economical.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The user interface of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert could be more intuitive, and I would appreciat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET Inspect

Compared 12% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs ESET Inspect

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs ESET Inspect

Compared 3% of the time

More ESET Inspect Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 15% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 4% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 2% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect

April 2026

Download ESET Inspect product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

March 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Expert product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ESET Enterprise Inspector

Kaspersky EDR

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ESET Inspect is an essential component to help ensure the highest level of enterprise security. While standard ESET Endpoint Security provides strong protection, ESET Inspect takes your environment's security to a new dimension. A security tool is needed to help security professionals protect their sensitive data and detect and investigate security incidents, advanced threats, and targeted attacks or breaches on endpoint devices. ESET Inspect is a tool that offers the peace of mind of continuous protection and security monitoring in a powerful and easy-to-use solution.

ESET

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a robust cybersecurity tool that delivers protection against cyberthreats while enhancing visibility and response capabilities for IT security teams.

This comprehensive solution integrates with Endpoint Protection Platform to block and detect cyberthreats while providing tools for IT security professionals. Backed by 30 years of experience, it is trusted by over 600 enterprise customers, safeguarding more than 2.5 million endpoints across the globe. The system is built with a powerful set of detection engines, enabling proactive threat investigation with clear visualization. It features an open architecture supporting broad integration capabilities, making it versatile for diverse IT environments.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses machine learning and behavior analytics to identify sophisticated threats.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Provides robust security measures, including intrusion prevention and firewall capabilities.
Open Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Kaspersky SIEM, Endpoint Security, and third-party workflows.
Embedded Sandbox: Analyzes suspicious files in depth to determine threat levels.
Centralized Management: Facilitates encryption and reporting for enhanced usability.

What benefits can users expect when using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Effective Security: Offers reliable protection against malware and ransomware.
Scalability: Designed to support expanding infrastructures.
Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with centralized control.
Responsive Support: Provides swift assistance for technical issues.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and corporate IT, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is employed for network and endpoint security, shielding against malware, zero-day threats, and unauthorized access. It empowers these sectors with enhanced threat intelligence, secure data protection, and effective patch management, facilitating robust protection across diverse ecosystems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Cannon, T-Mobile

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

March 2026

Free Report: ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.