OpenText Functional Testing and Endtest compete in automated testing. Functional Testing is stronger in integration abilities, while Endtest stands out in ease of use and versatility.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides robust integration capabilities, supporting enterprise platforms and extensive customization. It offers tailored solutions for complex environments and seamless integrations. Endtest provides no-code test creation, facilitating flexibility and quicker deployment cycles, alongside user-friendly maintenance of tests.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing requires a more intricate setup beneficial for thorough onboarding and support. Endtest has a quicker deployment model due to its straightforward nature and is supported by responsive customer service, making it ideal for those favoring speed and minimal initial complexity.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing typically involves a higher initial setup cost yet offers significant ROI for comprehensive needs. Endtest is more cost-effective, providing a reliable return on investment for tighter budgets, delivering value in efficiency and lower cost settings.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 11.2% |
| Endtest | 0.3% |
| Other | 88.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
Endtest is a versatile tool for automating web application testing, known for its user-friendly interface that caters to both technical and non-technical users. Key features include robust automation, comprehensive analytics, and seamless integration. It enhances organizational efficiency, collaboration, and ensures reliable, cost-effective testing.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
