No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DuploCloud vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DuploCloud
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
13th
Average Rating
4.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability Services (1st)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (3rd), Container Management (4th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Agile and DevOps Services category, the mindshare of DuploCloud is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 6.6%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Agile and DevOps Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat OpenShift6.6%
DuploCloud1.7%
Other91.7%
Agile and DevOps Services
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Self-service cloud automation has transformed our compliant microservice delivery speed
The most objective critique I can give of any low-code abstraction tool is feature latency. Major cloud providers such as AWS and Azure release dozens of new services, instance types, or deep granular configurations every single year. Because DuploCloud sits as a translation layer between the engineer and the cloud provider, there is naturally a slight lag before those brand-new features show up in DuploCloud portal or in its custom Terraform provider. If our team wants to experiment with a newly launched AWS machine learning instance type or a highly specific EKS feature, sometimes we have to wait for DuploCloud to build it into their UI or find a temporary workaround via native cloud consoles. While DuploCloud is designed to make standard compliant infrastructure setups incredibly fast, sometimes edge cases can happen. The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year. The UI simplifies everything, so when we actually needed to inject the raw, highly complex native Kubernetes YAML modifications, the escape hatch to override standard rules can sometimes have a learning curve, which we have already faced. Streamlining how advanced overrides to default settings work without breaking the compliance engine would be a great user experience improvement. The platform actively monitors for compliance drifts and logs system configuration perfectly. However, the searchability, filtering, and reporting element inside the administrative audit log UI could be more intuitive.
AA
Operation Director at Zaintech
Platform has transformed our cloud into a secure, unified home for diverse modern applications
One of the best features of Red Hat OpenShift is that it has the catalog, the application catalog, and the operator hub, which allows us to deploy things easily and straightforward without going into a lot of hassles. This is one of the main things, in addition to having integration with ACM and ACS, where we can have the ability to manage multiple clusters and to secure them, deploy them, manage them, run GitOps and day-two operations, as well as upgrades and other functionality which is made easy using these tools. Red Hat OpenShift also provides virtualization capabilities, and I am currently working with Zain to make a project where we will convert F5 appliances to virtual machines and to manage them through Red Hat virtualization, OVE. Red Hat OpenShift is a unique platform because it provides the features for both worlds, containerization, and VMs at the same time, requiring you to learn one skillset in order to manage all of this at the same time. In the beginning, our cloud depended only on virtual machines, so I introduced this to our management to start to work with microservices and with containerization. This was adapted in our cloud, providing us the capability to sell more of these features and to reduce the hardware requirement by about thirty percent, following the trends of using containerization for all modern applications. In addition, it reduced the time to develop and to deploy a new application; all we need is using Jenkins for CI/CD. Once we commit any code, it gets triggered, and it will implement the new container in a very flexible and easy way, within seconds. This decreased the time to market and increased agility, allowing us to capture new opportunities very fast.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When using DuploCloud's graphical interface, we can do the exact same thing safely in under ten to fifteen minutes without needing a dedicated DevOps engineer."
"We managed our own infrastructure previously."
"Their initial onboarding and migration service was great."
"Red Hat OpenShift has proven to be an intelligent product for me, being built on Kubernetes, which is widely recognized and is where many cloud providers are deploying new workloads."
"We are able to operate client’s platform without downtime during security patch management each month and provide a good SLA (as scalability for applications is processed during heavy client website load, automatically)."
"Our go-to-market and our deployment for any application, the time is reduced perhaps by eight times, because the things that we used to do in days now take a couple of minutes to be done."
"I would recommend Red Hat OpenShift, especially for its automation capabilities."
"Overall, the solution's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is excellent."
"The solution offers ease with which we can define how to run applications and configure them. It's much more convenient than creating a virtual machine and configuring application servers, making the process faster and simpler."
"Red Hat OpenShift has positively impacted my organization through digital transformation and faster rollout of applications, for example, before using Red Hat OpenShift, our customer waited two days to roll out an application, but with Red Hat OpenShift, they now wait approximately two hours to roll out an application in the production environment."
"The security is good."
 

Cons

"After nearly two months of onboarding, we never reached a working production environment."
"The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year."
"There seems to be significant effort toward vendor lock-in."
"OpenShift can improve monitoring. Sometimes there are issues. Additionally, the solution could benefit from protective tools if something was to happen in our network."
"I'd like to see support for more than one server, a mobile user registry."
"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."
"One area for improvement with Red Hat OpenShift is in management and cluster implementation."
"We had to discontinue this solution due to many limitations."
"With OpenShift, I can only manage a particular area. I can't manage other Kubernetes clusters."
"The operators need a lot of improvement, with better integrations."
"The latest 4.0 version of OpenShift disabled a few of the features we previously made use of, although this wasn't a huge deal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."
"We are currently using the open version, OKD. We plan to get the enterprise version in the future."
"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."
"The cost is quite high."
"We use the license-free version of Red Hat Openshift but we pay for the support."
"I don't deal with the cost part, but I know that the cost is very high when compared to other products. They charge for CPU and memory, but we don't worry about it."
"The product’s pricing is expensive."
"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Agile and DevOps Services solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise57
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DuploCloud?
It is important to read the contract very carefully. I understood that we had a 30-day notice period, but according to Duplo, we are locked into a yearly contract.
What needs improvement with DuploCloud?
The most objective critique I can give of any low-code abstraction tool is feature latency. Major cloud providers such as AWS and Azure release dozens of new services, instance types, or deep granu...
What is your primary use case for DuploCloud?
The main use case for DuploCloud in my organization is to enable developer self-service for infrastructure provisioning and application development without sacrificing our security and compliance p...
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What needs improvement with OpenShift?
One area for improvement in Red Hat OpenShift is during upgrades, as there is currently no option to revert to a previous version if vulnerabilities or issues arise. I believe that providing such a...
 

Also Known As

DuploCloud - DevSecOps Automation Platform / DevOps-as-a-Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about DuploCloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.