No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DuploCloud vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DuploCloud
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
18th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability Services (2nd)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (4th), Container Management (5th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Agile and DevOps Services category, the mindshare of DuploCloud is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 6.4%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Agile and DevOps Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat OpenShift6.4%
DuploCloud1.6%
Other92.0%
Agile and DevOps Services
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Self-service cloud automation has transformed our compliant microservice delivery speed
The most objective critique I can give of any low-code abstraction tool is feature latency. Major cloud providers such as AWS and Azure release dozens of new services, instance types, or deep granular configurations every single year. Because DuploCloud sits as a translation layer between the engineer and the cloud provider, there is naturally a slight lag before those brand-new features show up in DuploCloud portal or in its custom Terraform provider. If our team wants to experiment with a newly launched AWS machine learning instance type or a highly specific EKS feature, sometimes we have to wait for DuploCloud to build it into their UI or find a temporary workaround via native cloud consoles. While DuploCloud is designed to make standard compliant infrastructure setups incredibly fast, sometimes edge cases can happen. The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year. The UI simplifies everything, so when we actually needed to inject the raw, highly complex native Kubernetes YAML modifications, the escape hatch to override standard rules can sometimes have a learning curve, which we have already faced. Streamlining how advanced overrides to default settings work without breaking the compliance engine would be a great user experience improvement. The platform actively monitors for compliance drifts and logs system configuration perfectly. However, the searchability, filtering, and reporting element inside the administrative audit log UI could be more intuitive.
AA
Operation Director at Zaintech
Platform has transformed our cloud into a secure, unified home for diverse modern applications
One of the best features of Red Hat OpenShift is that it has the catalog, the application catalog, and the operator hub, which allows us to deploy things easily and straightforward without going into a lot of hassles. This is one of the main things, in addition to having integration with ACM and ACS, where we can have the ability to manage multiple clusters and to secure them, deploy them, manage them, run GitOps and day-two operations, as well as upgrades and other functionality which is made easy using these tools. Red Hat OpenShift also provides virtualization capabilities, and I am currently working with Zain to make a project where we will convert F5 appliances to virtual machines and to manage them through Red Hat virtualization, OVE. Red Hat OpenShift is a unique platform because it provides the features for both worlds, containerization, and VMs at the same time, requiring you to learn one skillset in order to manage all of this at the same time. In the beginning, our cloud depended only on virtual machines, so I introduced this to our management to start to work with microservices and with containerization. This was adapted in our cloud, providing us the capability to sell more of these features and to reduce the hardware requirement by about thirty percent, following the trends of using containerization for all modern applications. In addition, it reduced the time to develop and to deploy a new application; all we need is using Jenkins for CI/CD. Once we commit any code, it gets triggered, and it will implement the new container in a very flexible and easy way, within seconds. This decreased the time to market and increased agility, allowing us to capture new opportunities very fast.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Their initial onboarding and migration service was great."
"When using DuploCloud's graphical interface, we can do the exact same thing safely in under ten to fifteen minutes without needing a dedicated DevOps engineer."
"A smaller cloud running on containers enables easy deployment with the ability to scale up and scale down, and it can host multiple services on the same platform."
"I find the resilient infrastructure feature of OpenShift very valuable, as it has no downtime at all."
"Provides support throughout the whole platform."
"OpenShift is great for flexibility, agility, and speed of delivery."
"Customer service is perfect."
"We are able to operate client’s platform without downtime during security patch management each month and provide a good SLA (as scalability for applications is processed during heavy client website load, automatically)."
"Its interface is good. The other part is the seamless integration with the stack that I have. Because my stack is mostly of Red Hat, which is running on top of VMware virtualization, I have had no issues with integrating both of these and trying to install them. We had a seamless integration with the other non-Red Hat products as well."
"Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."
 

Cons

"There seems to be significant effort toward vendor lock-in."
"The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year."
"It would be great if it supported Bitbucket repositories too."
"We want to see better alerting, especially in critical situations requiring immediate intervention. Until we go to the dashboard, it can be challenging to quickly recognize that there's an issue for us to deal with. Therefore, a popup of the event or a tweaked GUI to catch our attention when it's alerting would be a welcome change. Everything else is good. We don't need any additional features. From the operations perspective, as an administrator, there is nothing concerning."
"OpenShift can improve monitoring. Sometimes there are issues. Additionally, the solution could benefit from protective tools if something was to happen in our network."
"I find it quite challenging to maintain and manage everything without extensive experience."
"Support could improve with faster response times, as responses are currently quite slow."
"OpenShift could be improved if it were more accessible for smaller budgets."
"One area for improvement with Red Hat OpenShift is in management and cluster implementation."
"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost is quite high."
"The model of pricing and buying licences is quite rigid. We are in the process of negotiating on demand pricing which will help us take advantage of the cloud as a whole."
"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."
"The product’s pricing is expensive."
"We use the license-free version of Red Hat Openshift but we pay for the support."
"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The pricing is standard; the solution isn't particularly expensive or affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Agile and DevOps Services solutions are best for your needs.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise56
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DuploCloud?
It is important to read the contract very carefully. I understood that we had a 30-day notice period, but according to Duplo, we are locked into a yearly contract.
What needs improvement with DuploCloud?
The most objective critique I can give of any low-code abstraction tool is feature latency. Major cloud providers such as AWS and Azure release dozens of new services, instance types, or deep granu...
What is your primary use case for DuploCloud?
The main use case for DuploCloud in my organization is to enable developer self-service for infrastructure provisioning and application development without sacrificing our security and compliance p...
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What needs improvement with OpenShift?
I hope that the interface and dashboard can become more user-friendly to assist in creating clusters and managing network interfaces easily, as opposed to relying heavily on command lines, which co...
 

Also Known As

DuploCloud - DevSecOps Automation Platform / DevOps-as-a-Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, GitHub, Broadcom and others in Agile and DevOps Services. Updated: June 2026.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.