No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DMARC Compass vs Trellix Collaboration Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DMARC Compass
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Digital Risk Protection (33rd), DMARC Authentication Software (7th)
Trellix Collaboration Security
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (11th), Instant Communications Security and Compliance (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (7th), AI Security (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. DMARC Compass is designed for Digital Risk Protection and holds a mindshare of 1.0%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Trellix Collaboration Security, on the other hand, focuses on Instant Communications Security and Compliance, holds 4.3% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.
Digital Risk Protection Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DMARC Compass1.0%
Recorded Future10.3%
ZeroFOX10.2%
Other78.5%
Digital Risk Protection
Instant Communications Security and Compliance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Collaboration Security4.3%
SecuSUITE for Government14.1%
AWS Wickr9.6%
Other72.0%
Instant Communications Security and Compliance
 

Featured Reviews

Use DMARC Compass?
Leave a review
Felipe Antoniazzi - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Lead at Johnson and Johnson
Real-time threat response has boosted detection accuracy and reduces manual investigation work
I have had challenges in the past with Trellix Collaboration Security for implementation because of issues related to compatibility. Since we worked in a global company with different operating systems, it was necessary to create different plans and different actions to implement the product.One thing I really do not prefer in Trellix Collaboration Security is not related to the console. I am a McAfee fan since the McAfee tool, and I find the console of Trellix Collaboration Security to be very user-friendly and easy to use. However, I do not know if it is related to the architecture of the product. Of course, we have modern threats based on behaviors and zero days. We have today CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, where we have better results based on threats and behavior, where it is possible to create a simulation environment based on the file detected and based on it, confirm if it really is malicious or not. In general, I believe Trellix Collaboration Security improved the console based on the last console of McAfee, but I think it is possible to improve more. It really is a good product, but in my view, it needs to improve detection based on behaviors. Regarding automations, I have implemented Trellix Collaboration Security here at Johnson & Johnson, and I implemented it in the same situation at Santander Bank and BNP Paribas Bank, where I created automations to export data for different metrics, including malicious detections, compliance, baselines, scans, last scans based on the seven days, and checking of patterns. I export everything to CSV files. Based on that, I create Power BI dashboards, and in these Power BI dashboards, I have a more executive view for different metrics to provide to myself, my manager, or director to create an executive view based on it. Another important point we use here at Johnson & Johnson and other companies is a data hub or a SIEM solution, such as Elastic or ArcSight, where we select some logs to be sent and use it to build reports and metrics.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Construction Company
13%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with FireEye Email Security?
I believe no improvements are needed for Trellix Collaboration Security as we are already using more tools from Trellix. I don't think any improvements are necessary or there are features missing i...
What is your primary use case for FireEye Email Security?
My main use case for Trellix Collaboration Security is to protect our platforms like Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Drive, OneDrive, and Google Drive. With the help of Trellix Collaborat...
What advice do you have for others considering FireEye Email Security?
My advice for others looking into using Trellix Collaboration Security is to prevent insider threat vectors because a colleague may unknowingly share infected files. You need to be vigilant and ens...
 

Also Known As

No data available
FireEye Email Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Northshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, ZeroFOX, Proofpoint and others in Digital Risk Protection. Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.