Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dify vs Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dify
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (50th), AI Software Development (194th)
Pulse Elasticsearch and Ope...
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dify and Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dify is designed for Low-Code Development Platforms and holds a mindshare of 0.5%.
Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch, on the other hand, focuses on Indexing and Search, holds 0.5% mindshare.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Dify0.5%
Microsoft Power Apps9.0%
Appian5.8%
Other84.7%
Low-Code Development Platforms
Indexing and Search Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch0.5%
Elastic Search13.6%
Lucidworks7.5%
Other78.4%
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

Rafayel Agamyan - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Search performance has transformed customer document access and continues to improve satisfaction
Customer satisfaction has significantly improved since switching to Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch from old legacy services, as many insights from customers indicate that latency has changed dramatically and the speed is significantly better now. For others looking into using Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch, it is definitely recommended to give it a try, especially if old legacy systems that are slow are currently being used. Lately, OpenSearch has come up with a new version that greatly enhances speed, so trying it is encouraged and it will be loved. A review rating of 9 reflects the overall satisfaction with Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
7%
Media Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your primary use case for Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch?
Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch has been utilized for around three years. The main use case is using it as a search engine for customers. Depending on the company, insurance companies search for...
What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch?
Customer satisfaction has significantly improved since switching to Pulse Elasticsearch and OpenSearch from old legacy services, as many insights from customers indicate that latency has changed dr...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: November 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.