No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dify vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dify
Ranking in AI Software Development
199th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (29th)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Dify is 0.3%. The mindshare of Make is 0.6%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.6%
Dify0.3%
Other99.1%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Rusira Sathnindu - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Visual workflows have accelerated our agent POC while better UI and observability still need work
My personal experience with Dify's UI is that it is not my favorite, as it can be improved a little bit, and sometimes the UI feels a little bit buggy. I am not sure if that is because it was a self-hosted version. The documentation can also be improved a little bit more. I think not a lot of people are using Dify currently, so that is why the documentation is not very great. If the documentation was improved, that would also be a really good thing. Currently, Dify could improve by offering better observability like other platforms. We currently use OpenAI Agents SDK, which requires you to build everything by code, but the observability is really good. It has OpenAI Traces, and you can basically trace everything for a conversation. If Dify had that kind of tracing functionality, that would be great.
FA
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes
Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Dify has positively impacted the organization because accuracy has been improved, and the time and complexity in flows that were manual are now automated, from HR automation to ERP level transactions, including subscription management in the SaaS application, monitoring, and analytics."
"Using Dify has positively impacted our organization because we were able to cut down on some development time and do a lot of testing in a very small time period."
"Using Dify has positively impacted our organization because we were able to cut down on some development time and do a lot of testing in a very small time period."
"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."
"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."
"Using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved."
"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions."
"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn."
"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."
 

Cons

"One of the main concerns that we had is that it might not be very scalable because we are hosting it in a self-hosted environment, and we have to configure the architecture and everything."
"One of the main concerns that we had is that it might not be very scalable because we are hosting it in a self-hosted environment, and we have to configure the architecture and everything."
"The only improvement would be if Dify provided an SMTP server that could be connected to automate Dify workflow management, as that would be a great option."
"Make is stable about 95% of the time, but I have noticed 5% of the time it has authentication issues and connection problems with the credentials, which are refreshed every week."
"Make can enhance the credit limit for free use because what is happening now is that most of the credits have been used during testing only."
"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."
"There is a file size constraint, as when I try to upload a PDF question bank of 200 pages, it shows an error and the file cannot process the data."
"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."
"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."
"Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier."
"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Non Tech Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that the cost is effective and licensing was affordable.
What needs improvement with Make?
Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier.Fur...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make is that it serves as a perfect tool to interlace most of our API connections, syncing different environments together. Make enables us to connect apps that lack native int...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Docker and others in AI Software Development. Updated: February 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.