Devo vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Veritas are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Veritas is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 4.6% mindshare in IOA, compared to Veritas’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
1,598 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Read 7 Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics reviews

1,061 Views
1,061 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Devo and Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Operations Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), AIOps (16th)

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.6%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.6%
Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics	2.5%
Other	92.9%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Nitin Mandlik

Senior Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Integrating third-party tools for effective data management and reporting

There are challenges with the data collector options in Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics. When I upgrade, the data collector tends to stop working, requiring me to open a case with Veritas. It takes them a long time, usually over a month, to resolve the issue, which is a pain point. I believe improving this aspect would enhance the user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."

"It's very, very versatile."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"When comparing Devo with Splunk and Carbon Black, I think Devo is the leader."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"The features I find most valuable in Devo are that it works on unstructured data."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

More Devo pros

"My experience with the technical support by Veritas is pretty good."

"Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics is technically much simpler than many backups, which provides a competitive advantage."

"The valuable features include getting an overview of the backup status and gaining an understanding of my backup environment."

"The deduplication engine compared to Azure backups is a cost-efficient feature regarding storage."

"It's helpful because I can have full visibility of my IT environment."

"The most valuable feature of the product is the insight it provides on the console."

"The scalability is great. It is one of the best advantages that I find important."

"The most valuable aspects of Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics are its reporting capabilities and the ability to integrate with third-party tools, such as an ITSM system, for automated checks on live backup statuses."

Cons

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"The customer service is average. Technical support from Devo is helpful, but they can improve on the support model."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

More Devo cons

"During the last issue that occurred due to the counter-strike, we needed recovery instantly for a large number of machines, more than a thousand machines, and Cohesity was the best solution for us."

"The process should be made easier."

"The quality of technical support has decreased over time with slower response times compared to before."

"The technical support from Veritas is disappointing as they take a long time, often over a month or two, to resolve issues."

"The solution should allow users to export data to Tableau."

"The documentation could be better; this should be improved."

"The process should be made easier. It is very complicated, and there is more with NetBackup; it is very difficult for me to oversee."

"NetBackup is not great in disaster recovery (DR) and data center to DR setup, especially in the Cloud environment. Veritas Resiliency Platform is not very handy for cloud-to-cloud, cross-platform replication."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The product has a fair price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics?

They have changed their licensing model and increased the pricing, which has caused some concern. Additionally, I have to pay for maintenance and support separately.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics?

I would recommend that they implement instant mass recovery because in Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics, it takes a very long time. During the last issue that occurred due to the counter-strike, we n...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics?

We are using Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics on physical infrastructure. We are not using it for any virtual or cloud infrastructure because we have our internal cloud, so we are not going on any pu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Compared 24% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Compared 19% of the time

Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

Moogsoft vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

New Relic vs Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

More Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

August 2026

Download Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics offers robust tools for data protection and backup insights for businesses seeking comprehensive analysis. With a focus on delivering reliable metrics, it enhances IT operations through detailed reporting and system integration, ensuring efficient resource utilization.

Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics is designed to provide IT professionals with advanced analytics solutions that streamline data protection strategies. It addresses critical use cases including predictive analysis, capacity planning, and multi-cloud support, enabling organizations to harness the full potential of their backup environments. The platform's detailed dashboards and customizable reports aid in identifying bottlenecks, ensuring optimal performance and compliance with industry standards. By integrating seamlessly with various data sources and storage systems, it offers a holistic overview, facilitating data-driven decision-making.

What are the key features of Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics?

Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into backup operations and resource allocations.
Predictive Analytics: Provides forecasts and trends to preemptively address storage needs.
Multi-Cloud Support: Seamlessly integrates with diverse cloud environments for unified data management.
Custom Dashboards: Allows tailored views for specific requirements and insights.
Integration with Data Sources: Connects with various platforms for centralized analytics.

What benefits should users look for in Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines data management processes and reduces downtime.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and avoids unnecessary expenditures.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides actionable insights for strategic planning.
Risk Reduction: Ensures compliance and identifies potential vulnerabilities.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics is implemented to address stringent regulatory requirements and manage large volumes of sensitive data. By leveraging its analytics capabilities, these sectors can ensure data integrity, optimize storage solutions, and maintain compliance with industry regulations.

Veritas

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.