Devo vs Huntress Managed SIEM comparison

Devo and Huntress are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while Huntress is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 1.1% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Huntress’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

2,909 Views
1,862 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed SIEM

Read 2 Huntress Managed SIEM reviews

1,125 Views
1,125 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Devo and Huntress Managed SIEM compete in the Security Information and Event Management category. Devo seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and scalability, while Huntress is preferred for ease of use and customer support.

Features: Devo's key features include advanced analytical capabilities, real-time threat detection, and remarkable flexibility, ideal for complex data environments. Huntress offers simplicity, integrated threat intelligence, and automated response mechanisms, making it suitable for straightforward setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo provides a flexible deployment model suitable for various IT environments but may require more initial setup and expertise. Huntress ensures a prompt deployment process alongside highly regarded customer service, benefiting those seeking immediate implementation and ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: Devo involves a higher initial setup cost, impacting smaller enterprises, but offers considerable ROI through extensive data insights over time. Huntress presents competitive pricing with emphasis on cost-effective operations and rapid returns, making it a financially sound option for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (28th), IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)

Huntress Managed SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed SIEM is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Devo	1.1%
Huntress Managed SIEM	1.3%
Other	97.6%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

reviewer2705400

Director, Engineering & Services Professional at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Managed detection has reduced threat anxiety and provides fast responses across diverse clients

I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress MDR and SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side. Regarding the SIEM, I would like to see more features added. I would appreciate the capability of setting our own alerting based on certain triggers within the logs so that we can compete and fill a void that their SIEM has compared to other SIEMs in the industry such as Perch Security for ConnectWise.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"It's very, very versatile."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

More Devo pros

"Huntress Managed SIEM's response time is far superior to any other vendor we have tested in terms of MDR."

"Huntress is a great company and incredibly helpful with deployment."

"The single pane of glass management with the other security products we use from Huntress is incredibly valuable."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

More Devo cons

"There should be better exclusions of log types and the ability to exclude specific types of logs that might be using a lot of data."

"I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress Managed SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huntress Managed SIEM?

I think the pricing for SIEM is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress Managed SIEM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress Managed SIEM?

Huntress is our primary MDR solution, though we have had some clients on Arctic Wolf and Perch Security. We deploy it across all different verticals, including hospitals and healthcare, small busin...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Security vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 18% of the time

Wazuh vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

Hunters vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 10% of the time

Blumira vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 9% of the time

More Huntress Managed SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

January 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download Huntress Managed SIEM product report

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM delivers advanced threat detection and response capabilities tailored for Security Information and Event Management. It addresses cybersecurity challenges with automated monitoring and actionable insights.

Huntress Managed SIEM stands out by offering comprehensive security event monitoring designed for modern cybersecurity landscapes. It identifies potential threats and vulnerabilities, ensuring actionable data for quicker response. Its integration capabilities with existing security infrastructure make it a reliable choice for enhancing cyber defenses and incident resolution.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed SIEM?

Automated Threat Detection: Identifies threats automatically to streamline defense processes.
Incident Response: Facilitates rapid action with clear response strategies.
Security Event Correlation: Analyzes diverse data sources for threat correlation.
Integrative Monitoring: Works seamlessly with current security setups.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from Huntress Managed SIEM?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances the ability to detect and respond to incidents.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and effort needed for monitoring and response.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers robust security without the need for extensive resources.
Scalability: Grows with the business to maintain effective security measures.

Huntress Managed SIEM is widely used across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it is critical to protect sensitive information. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs makes it an ideal choice for strengthening security frameworks in diverse sectors.

Huntress

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

December 2025

Free Report: Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.