Devo vs Huntress Managed SIEM comparison

Devo and Huntress are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while Huntress is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Huntress’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

5,226 Views
3,031 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed SIEM

Read 5 Huntress Managed SIEM reviews

2,353 Views
2,353 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Devo and Huntress Managed SIEM are competitors in the Managed Security Information and Event Management category. Huntress is favored due to its robust features, despite Devo offering more competitive pricing.

Features: Devo's advanced data analytics provide real-time insights and excellent scalability. It offers strong customer support and competitive pricing. Huntress Managed SIEM features comprehensive threat detection, proactive security measures, and superior threat prevention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed SIEM has a straightforward deployment process and offers dedicated support teams, making it easy to integrate with responsive support. Devo also provides reliable customer support, but its deployment process is more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Devo is cost-effective, providing good ROI for smaller enterprises seeking robust analytics at a lower cost. Huntress Managed SIEM is more expensive, yet delivers enhanced security features, providing higher ROI for businesses that prioritize security.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (27th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (19th)

Huntress Managed SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

31st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed SIEM is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Huntress Managed SIEM	1.1%
Other	97.7%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

reviewer2805510

Partner Account Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees

Human-guided threat monitoring has delivered rapid, confident incident response and strong compliance

I believe Huntress Managed SIEM could be improved by increasing integrations with non-Microsoft solutions as this would broaden its appeal. A broader out-of-the-box solution for diverse environments including IoT, Mac OS, and Linux servers would be valuable. I would rate Huntress Managed SIEM an eight because a couple of things could be changed, such as having more integrations with non-Microsoft systems, improved customization on the dashboard, and enhanced reporting in the threat intelligence updates. Being unable to click on new niche variants of threats is another point I would mention, but overall an eight out of ten is a good score because I think it is a very well-priced solution for its capabilities and all the positives I have outlined. The eight rating is primarily influenced by those integration and customization points I mentioned, which are the main requests from customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."

"Overall, I have no issues with it and my guys love it."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

More Devo pros

"Huntress is a great company and incredibly helpful with deployment."

"The single pane of glass management with the other security products we use from Huntress is incredibly valuable."

"Huntress Managed SIEM's response time is far superior to any other vendor we have tested in terms of MDR."

"If you want to secure your infrastructure and save a lot of time for your organization, you can use Huntress Managed SIEM."

"Huntress Managed SIEM is designed to make powerful threat detection, response, and compliance support accessible without the complexities and costs of traditional SIEMs."

"During the year I have been using it, I have seen improvements such as no alert fatigue, which is beneficial, and obviously the automated threat detection."

Cons

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

More Devo cons

"There should be better exclusions of log types and the ability to exclude specific types of logs that might be using a lot of data."

"The scalability for SMEs and MSPs is noteworthy for a few hundred endpoints, but it struggles with scalability when dealing with high logs, multi-site, multi-tenant setups, and large volumes of endpoints, which poses a challenge."

"In my opinion, there is room for improvement in Huntress Managed SIEM, particularly in integration with third-party solutions."

"I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress Managed SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side."

"There should be better exclusions of log types and the ability to exclude specific types of logs that might be using a lot of data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huntress Managed SIEM?

I think the pricing for SIEM is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress Managed SIEM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress Managed SIEM?

My main use case for Huntress Managed SIEM is working with partners who will then be able to deliver the customer needs to the end user. I work with enabling partners and discuss security informati...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Wazuh vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Fluency vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Hunters vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 8% of the time

More Huntress Managed SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

May 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Huntress Managed SIEM

May 2026

Download Huntress Managed SIEM product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM delivers advanced threat detection and response capabilities tailored for Security Information and Event Management. It addresses cybersecurity challenges with automated monitoring and actionable insights.

Huntress Managed SIEM stands out by offering comprehensive security event monitoring designed for modern cybersecurity landscapes. It identifies potential threats and vulnerabilities, ensuring actionable data for quicker response. Its integration capabilities with existing security infrastructure make it a reliable choice for enhancing cyber defenses and incident resolution.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed SIEM?

Automated Threat Detection: Identifies threats automatically to streamline defense processes.
Incident Response: Facilitates rapid action with clear response strategies.
Security Event Correlation: Analyzes diverse data sources for threat correlation.
Integrative Monitoring: Works seamlessly with current security setups.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from Huntress Managed SIEM?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances the ability to detect and respond to incidents.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and effort needed for monitoring and response.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers robust security without the need for extensive resources.
Scalability: Grows with the business to maintain effective security measures.

Huntress Managed SIEM is widely used across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it is critical to protect sensitive information. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs makes it an ideal choice for strengthening security frameworks in diverse sectors.

Huntress

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

April 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.