Devo vs Huntress Managed SIEM comparison

Devo and Huntress are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Huntress is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 1.1% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Huntress’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Huntress users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

3,513 Views
2,108 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed SIEM

Read 2 Huntress Managed SIEM reviews

1,665 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Devo and Huntress Managed SIEM are competitors in the Managed Security Information and Event Management category. Huntress is favored due to its robust features, despite Devo offering more competitive pricing.

Features: Devo's advanced data analytics provide real-time insights and excellent scalability. It offers strong customer support and competitive pricing. Huntress Managed SIEM features comprehensive threat detection, proactive security measures, and superior threat prevention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huntress Managed SIEM has a straightforward deployment process and offers dedicated support teams, making it easy to integrate with responsive support. Devo also provides reliable customer support, but its deployment process is more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Devo is cost-effective, providing good ROI for smaller enterprises seeking robust analytics at a lower cost. Huntress Managed SIEM is more expensive, yet delivers enhanced security features, providing higher ROI for businesses that prioritize security.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (28th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), AIOps (21st)

Huntress Managed SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress Managed SIEM is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.1%
Huntress Managed SIEM	1.2%
Other	97.7%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

reviewer2705400

Director, Engineering & Services Professional at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Managed detection has reduced threat anxiety and provides fast responses across diverse clients

I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress MDR and SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side. Regarding the SIEM, I would like to see more features added. I would appreciate the capability of setting our own alerting based on certain triggers within the logs so that we can compete and fill a void that their SIEM has compared to other SIEMs in the industry such as Perch Security for ConnectWise.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Overall, using Devo has saved us time when compared to our previous security solutions, and I estimate that it took us 10 times longer to achieve the same thing without Devo."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

More Devo pros

"Huntress is a great company and incredibly helpful with deployment."

"Huntress Managed SIEM's response time is far superior to any other vendor we have tested in terms of MDR."

"The single pane of glass management with the other security products we use from Huntress is incredibly valuable."

Cons

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

More Devo cons

"There should be better exclusions of log types and the ability to exclude specific types of logs that might be using a lot of data."

"I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress Managed SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huntress Managed SIEM?

I think the pricing for SIEM is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huntress Managed SIEM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huntress Managed SIEM?

Huntress is our primary MDR solution, though we have had some clients on Arctic Wolf and Perch Security. We deploy it across all different verticals, including hospitals and healthcare, small busin...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Wazuh vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 14% of the time

Hunters vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 10% of the time

Fluency vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 9% of the time

More Huntress Managed SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

March 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

March 2026

Download Huntress Managed SIEM product report

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Huntress Managed SIEM delivers advanced threat detection and response capabilities tailored for Security Information and Event Management. It addresses cybersecurity challenges with automated monitoring and actionable insights.

Huntress Managed SIEM stands out by offering comprehensive security event monitoring designed for modern cybersecurity landscapes. It identifies potential threats and vulnerabilities, ensuring actionable data for quicker response. Its integration capabilities with existing security infrastructure make it a reliable choice for enhancing cyber defenses and incident resolution.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed SIEM?

Automated Threat Detection: Identifies threats automatically to streamline defense processes.
Incident Response: Facilitates rapid action with clear response strategies.
Security Event Correlation: Analyzes diverse data sources for threat correlation.
Integrative Monitoring: Works seamlessly with current security setups.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from Huntress Managed SIEM?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances the ability to detect and respond to incidents.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and effort needed for monitoring and response.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers robust security without the need for extensive resources.
Scalability: Grows with the business to maintain effective security measures.

Huntress Managed SIEM is widely used across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it is critical to protect sensitive information. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs makes it an ideal choice for strengthening security frameworks in diverse sectors.

Huntress

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

March 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Huntress Managed SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.