Deltek CostPoint vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Deltek and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Deltek is ranked #31, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.7. Deltek holds a 1.1% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Deltek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Deltek CostPoint

Read 1 Deltek CostPoint review

1,716 Views
1,699 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

3,030 Views
2,909 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Deltek CostPoint

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Deltek CostPoint and Microsoft Dynamics GP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP.

To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ERP

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,223 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Deltek CostPoint

Ranking in ERP

31st

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Deltek CostPoint is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.3%
Deltek CostPoint	1.1%
Other	97.6%

ERP

Featured Reviews

B Stine

Manager at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Good solution for finance in general but falls short on the manufacturing side

There is room for improvement when it comes to reporting and the manufacturing piece in general. I would like to see more of a complete solution with the operations end of the business, namely the quality management system and the production pieces. It's very good at project costing, cost accounting, accounting and finance in general. Where it falls short is the manufacturing side. Overall, the solution is very difficult to use and learn. The learning curve is difficult. Also, the GUI and user interface are not intuitive.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is fine."

"It is very good at project costing, cost accounting, accounting and finance in general."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"The stability was reliable."

"The product is very user-friendly and is easy to navigate, and you can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."

"It helps to streamline and automate their accounting processes."

"I’ve implemented several hundred Microsoft Dynamics GP systems for many customers, and the improvements brought about in the client’s reporting and transaction functions are off the charts."

"It is strong in integration."

"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."

"Numerous third-party add-on products are available to purchase for specific business needs."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"Overall, the solution is very difficult to use and learn. The learning curve is difficult. Also, the GUI and user interface are not intuitive."

"What could be improved is the functionality of Dynamics GP because it requires a lot of development by the programmers and the company in order to integrate into a solution."

"Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "

"It can be expensive. It depends on the size of your business and what you are trying to achieve with it."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is an affordable solution."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"The solution's price is steep."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

One area we’d like to see improved is cloud modernization and integration. Dynamics GP has been reliable for many businesses, but stronger native cloud capabilities, automation, AI, and easier inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Deltek CostPoint

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Deltek CostPoint

Compared 16% of the time

Viewpoint ERP vs Deltek CostPoint

Compared 15% of the time

ADP SmartCompliance vs Deltek CostPoint

Compared 14% of the time

IFS Cloud Platform vs Deltek CostPoint

Compared 8% of the time

More Deltek CostPoint Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ERP

October 2026

Download Deltek CostPoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

October 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

CostPoint

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Deltek CostPoint is a robust software designed for businesses looking to enhance financial management and project execution. Tailored for government contractors and professional services firms, it streamlines operations by integrating accounting, project management, and HR functionalities.

Supported by a cloud-based platform, Deltek CostPoint offers advanced capabilities that facilitate compliance, project costing, and financial performance tracking. Its integrated modules are ideal for firms seeking precise data analytics and improved operational efficiency. As a trusted tool for many firms, it addresses the complexities inherent in government contracting and professional services industries.

What are Deltek CostPoint's key features?

Project Accounting: Enables accurate project costing and financial tracking.
Compliance Management: Meets the regulatory requirements of government contracts.
Resource Planning: Optimizes workforce scheduling and utilization.
Business Intelligence: Provides insights with real-time data analytics.
Time & Expense Management: Streamlines tracking and compliance for employee inputs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce wasted resources.
Cost Savings: Optimized processes lead to financial savings.
Scalability: Adaptability allows for growth without hindrance.
Enhanced Visibility: Real-time data grants clearer business insights.

Deltek CostPoint is highly utilized in industries facing rigorous compliance standards, particularly government contractors. Its thorough integration of essential business functions enables these industries to manage projects with greater accuracy and confidence, fostering a competitive advantage in demanding environments.

Deltek

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Dougherty & Associates Inc, Groth Design Group, CDH Partners, Fieldstone Architecture, FKP Architects, Group2 Architecture Engineering Ltd., PHH ARC, Rios Clementi Hale Studios, R.J. Burnside & Associates Ltd., Seccuris, Stendel + Reich Architects, The Thompson Rosemount Group Inc.

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.