Dell RecoverPoint and Fivetran compete in the data replication and integration solutions category. Dell RecoverPoint has the upper hand in data protection and recovery scenarios, whereas Fivetran shines in ease of integration and data management automation, making it more suitable for data-driven applications.
Features: Dell RecoverPoint excels in block-level replication, seamless integration with VMware's Site Recovery Manager, and efficient bandwidth usage, catering to complex environments with multiple sites. Its continuous and remote data protection capabilities allow for reliable point-in-time recovery. Fivetran offers ease of use in managing data pipelines, automating data syncing with minimal manual intervention, and strong data flow and transformation capabilities. Its extensive connectors and integration capabilities make it highly valuable for diverse data connectivity needs.
Room for Improvement: Dell RecoverPoint could improve its support for broader storage solutions and address high storage consumption by journals. Users suggest enhancements in WAN optimization and VM compatibility. Fivetran faces criticism over high pricing, limited customization, and a need for additional connectors. Users have pointed out the need for better data pipeline observability, improved logging, and enhanced real-time processing speeds.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell RecoverPoint is primarily deployed on-premises, offering stability and established support but has varied responsiveness in severe cases. Fivetran supports public and hybrid cloud environments, known for its convenient cloud deployments. While user-friendly, its customer service and pricing processes sometimes face scrutiny.
Pricing and ROI: Dell RecoverPoint offers a one-off licensing model often bundled with EMC storage, considered a good value for data protection despite being pricey. It offers long-term ROI with a perpetual license, especially beneficial for critical data volumes. Fivetran's pricing, seen as expensive, offers a flexible model that scales with data use, making it attractive to larger organizations but less so for smaller setups due to potential costs.
A bank experienced a disaster within ten years and was able to recover all data, avoiding substantial losses.
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
Dell support is robust, with geographically distributed branches and partner support.
The engineers and software teams respond immediately once they receive a call, offering high-quality service.
If they could provide support more quickly, that would be great.
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
I consider Dell RecoverPoint highly scalable, rating it as a nine out of ten.
I consider Dell RecoverPoint to be very scalable, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Dell RecoverPoint can handle large scales of data, which is typical in the banking sector.
It is considered to be very stable.
They have 99.9% accuracy on the data load and they maintain transparency.
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
It requires double the storage capacity for source and target storage areas, which creates a heavy burden on storage resources.
The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simplifies many problems in the VMware environment.
Dell RecoverPoint can be improved by virtualizing it, which would use less storage and enhance performance.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
If Fivetran can build in more transformations, that would be really helpful in my opinion.
Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable.
VMware SRM was cheaper.
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
Dell RecoverPoint requires two sets of servers for both Data Center and Disaster Recovery, which can make it more expensive than other solutions.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
It operates seamlessly and efficiently, allowing for data recovery with no downtime during the copy process.
This feature is crucial for maintaining zero RPO and RTO, especially during any outage or disaster.
The failover and failback options are the most impactful features of Dell RecoverPoint in terms of data protection.
The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with a large variety of data sources is valuable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fivetran | 5.0% |
| Dell RecoverPoint | 3.3% |
| Other | 91.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Dell RecoverPoint provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.
Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
