Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security comparison

datto and TrendAI are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. datto is ranked #40, while TrendAI is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. datto holds a 1.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to TrendAI’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of datto users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of TrendAI users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 26, 2026

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response compete in the endpoint security market. Trend Vision One seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Datto EDR offers superior features that may justify its higher cost.

Features:Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat detection and prevention capabilities, real-time monitoring, and centralized management for holistic security. Datto EDR emphasizes advanced threat analysis, automated response features, and seamless integration capabilities catering to businesses with a focus on automated defense mechanisms.

Room for Improvement:Trend Vision One could enhance its feature set to match automation levels provided by competitors like Datto. Improvements in integration abilities with third-party apps might increase its utility for diverse infrastructures. Additional reporting features can enhance management capabilities. Datto EDR could offer more competitive pricing for smaller businesses to increase accessibility. A stronger emphasis on customer support might increase customer satisfaction. Furthermore, simplifying the deployment process could widen its appeal to users preferring ease of use over advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's straightforward deployment process and remarkable customer support make it suitable for businesses requiring reliable assistance. Datto EDR provides a streamlined deployment focusing on automated setup processes, offering an advantage for organizations seeking efficiency during deployment.

Pricing and ROI:Trend Vision One Endpoint Security stands out with competitive pricing, demonstrating significant ROI through integrated features, contributing to cost-effectiveness. Datto EDR, despite a higher initial cost, delivers substantial ROI by reducing threat potential with its advanced automation and analysis features, justifying its initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security is 1.6%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	1.6%
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	1.6%
Other	93.4%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2406663

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Effective risk response, easy deployment, and enhanced security

They use Datto EDR as part of the solutions that we supply Datto EDR has helped reduce overall security incident costs by fifteen percent. The ease of deployment has been good, and the responsiveness of the application to risks has been quite effective. The inclusion of web filtering would be…

Read full review

Oleksii Pavlyk

Head of security of digital systems, electronic databases and networks at Ukreximbank

Centralized console has improved visibility while setup remains quick on diverse environments

I don't know why I find it valuable; my colleague administrated it, but I was the chief of a team of six people, and one of them administered this product, which worked well for defending our servers. I don't know what the best features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security are; it performs well compared to other products, and I am curious about it, but I cannot think of specific features. Perhaps my colleagues could provide that information, but I do not have that knowledge. The centralized console helps my team greatly; it is very convenient as everything is all in one console, not only EDR but many other products, such as email security and XDR features. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security positively impacts our organization as it is very simple to install on Windows and Linux servers; it is not very difficult to install.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"It integrates well into the environment."

"The stability of this product is very good."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The ease of deployment has been good."

"The most valuable feature of Datto EDR is the visibility of the endpoints."

"Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is a perfect product for endpoint security."

"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent."

"It's easier to integrate Apex One than Kaspersky. It also performs well, and the customer feedback has been positive."

"The product has proven to be very flexible over the years that we have had it."

"This solution protects us from virus attacks before they affect the organization."

"Offers great application control, vulnerability protection, and behavior monitoring."

"Its reporting and dashboard are valuable. Its dashboard is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the antivirus."

"It provides comprehensive visibility into all client logs and seamlessly integrates with other products, such as CM."

"It's a good solution, and they have something called Suite incorporating many, many engines like encryption, GLB, anti-virus."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Product might have some bugs."

"I would like to see better protection, specifically to protect email applications."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

"I have seen lagging with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. There was one time when we faced a threat actor trying to gain access to our system. When our team utilized the tool, we were all on the same dashboard and we faced a lag issue at that time of around five minutes, which was quite significant."

"The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response)."

"It takes time to scan the servers and devices."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution could improve by having more deployment methods."

"The inclusion of web filtering would be good."

"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously."

"The solution should allow the automation of playbooks."

"Apex One uses a lot of RAM and other physical resources, and I also don't like the web interface."

"While the single console offers partial end-to-end visibility into our IT security environment, we leverage additional solutions to achieve comprehensive coverage, so this area can be improved by Apex One."

"It is weak in terms of intelligence. By implementing Trend Micro Apex One, I wanted to see real-life scenarios. I deployed it on 50 clients to check if I could do lateral moments and zero-day exploits. I wanted to check how the zero-day protection works with Trend Micro. It fails with most of them because it is signature-based. They are not looking at the MITRE ATT&CK framework, so with zero-day attacks, it mostly fails."

"The integration could improve in this solution."

"Sometimes it will not communicate with the server, and we need to manually restart items."

"It needs a consolidated manager as there are too many parts to currently manage it."

"The console can be better in terms of management and viewing the hierarchy of devices. Currently, setting up the hierarchy OU-wise is a bit cumbersome. It can be made a bit easier. If that can be more user-friendly and easier to manage, it would be great."

"The solution could use signatureless detection."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual license to use this solution. The price of the solution can be expensive depending on the company."

"Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is not an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Its pricing should be improved."

"Trend Micro has very aggressive pricing, but it is also very good."

"When compared with other solutions, the price could be better."

"The price of the solution is fair and there is a per-user license to use the solution. Our costs are approximately $2,000 a month, it can get costly if you have a lot of users."

"The price for Trend Micro is reasonable."

"It has a per-user license."

"If I remember correctly, the cost is approximately four and a half thousand per year."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	60

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infocyte HUNT?

The price is quite low. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a four, meaning it is quite cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infocyte HUNT?

The inclusion of web filtering would be good.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infocyte HUNT?

They use Datto EDR as part of the solutions that we supply.

See all answers

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and container...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?

It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

Regarding the price, there was a tender, and Trend Micro won; the price was good.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 11% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 7% of the time

More Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

TrendAI Deep Security vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 13% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

February 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2026

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Buyer's Guide

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

January 2026

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security report

Download TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Infocyte HUNT

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

With Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) you can detect and respond to advanced threats. Datto EDR is an easy to use cloud based EDR solution that's designed for Managed Service Providers (MSPs).

datto

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection through features like a web console and real-time updates. It integrates seamlessly for comprehensive endpoint coverage.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and centralized management. It features machine learning and virtual patching to safeguard against both known and unknown threats. Users highlight its ability to secure multiple environments with ransomware protection and data loss prevention. Despite its strengths, improved Linux support and EDR features are needed. Connectivity issues with the firewall and a need for refined reporting are noted, alongside demands for better performance during updates.

What are the key features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

User-friendly Web Console: Simplifies management and monitoring.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth incorporation into existing systems.
Excellent Threat Protection: Provides robust defense mechanisms against cyber threats.
Machine Learning: Detects new threats efficiently.
Real-time Updates: Keeps security measures current and effective.
Virtual Patching: Protects against vulnerabilities effectively.

What benefits should organizations consider when evaluating Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Comprehensive Endpoint Security: Provides extensive protection measures across platform environments.
Behavior Monitoring: Enhances threat detection capabilities by capturing anomalous activities.
Zero-day Threat Protection: Guards against emerging vulnerabilities promptly.
Strong Community Support: Offers a reliable support system for users.

Companies leverage Trend Vision One Endpoint Security in industries requiring strong data protection, such as healthcare and finance. It is deployed both on-premises and as a SaaS, integrating effortlessly with extensive networks for improved threat detection and device control. Its machine learning capabilities are particularly valued for handling diverse threat vectors efficiently.

TrendAI

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Check Point Software, PwC, Grant Thornton, AT&T, DHL, U.S. Department of Defense

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

Buyer's Guide

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

February 2026

Free Report: Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.