Datamatics TruBot vs Nintex RPA comparison

Datamatics and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Datamatics is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.5. Datamatics holds a 0.6% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Datamatics users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Datamatics TruBot

Read 3 Datamatics TruBot reviews

496 Views
471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

1,919 Views
1,861 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Datamatics TruBot

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Datamatics TruBot and Nintex RPA compete in the automation software market. Datamatics TruBot is often favored for pricing and support, while Nintex RPA stands out due to its broader capabilities and perceived value.

Features: Datamatics TruBot integrates with legacy systems, provides detailed analytics for process improvement, and is intuitive to use. Nintex RPA features extensive pre-built connectors, a powerful scripting tool for complex workflows, and customizable automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datamatics TruBot offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service for fast turnaround. Nintex RPA provides comprehensive deployment options, delivering greater scalability with dedicated support, suitable for extensive enterprise solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Datamatics TruBot is competitively priced, reducing setup costs with favorable ROI for smaller projects. Nintex RPA requires a significant initial investment; however, it provides substantial ROI over time for larger implementations due to its efficiency gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Datamatics TruBot

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Datamatics TruBot is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex RPA	2.0%
Datamatics TruBot	0.6%
Other	97.4%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Iqbal-Siddique

Business Head at MCS india

Offers good UI but needs to improve its integration capabilities

Speaking about how the tool is useful in automating repetitive tasks in our company, I would say that my company started to collect data with the help of Datamatics while also using its GPS tracking features. The tool's UI is much better than the ones offered by other similar products in the market. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I suggest that others use their own method of interrogation since it will help them achieve more growth in their organizations through the use of the tool. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and easy to use."

"Ability to calculate the ROI on the jobs that are running."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to many other solutions in the market."

"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."

"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."

"We took a very complex business area, and every activity in it which can be done automatically is being replaced by the robot instead of people working on it."

"The user-friendly environment allows for easy learning, and the end-to-end workflow management is excellent."

"We are able to cope with our clients's demands. No matter how much volume they throw at us, we are able to get it done quickly."

"As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win."

"The task mining aspect has been the most valuable for us. That's why we actually bought it."

"[One of the valuable features] is the triggers. It's relatively simple to activate it. You can activate it via Control-M or via email. It has a lot of built-in triggers which enable us to easily activate the jobs."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"There is a learning curve, and some training could be included to bring users up to speed."

"Would like to see more additions to the library."

"The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool."

"Extracting meaningful data requires significant effort. You need a dedicated business analyst who can understand the output."

"Kryon RPA need to enhance the robustness of our multi-board architecture to ensure the availability of bots on multiple machines."

"It could be more reliable in spying HTML."

"What needs improvement in Kryon RPA is the support. Sometimes, the solution has problems, so I contacted support, but I didn't receive immediate help from the team. You have to wait a while before the problem gets solved. This happens a few times in terms of getting cases solved. It would also be better if Kryon RPA had a cloud version because currently, from what I know, it only has an on-premise version, though I could be wrong about that. There isn't any additional feature I'd like added to Kryon RPA because it's a good service, but the support is very, very bad, so that area could be improved."

"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."

"We use Google Drive a lot. If somebody sends us a spreadsheet or a document, it's going to be in Google’s format. It's not going to be in Microsoft Office format. But currently, there's no integration with Google’s documents. That would be a huge plus to have."

"We have found some difficulties regarding the integration with legacy systems where the screen has elements in the Hebrew language. The connection to Hebrew, right-to-left systems, is more challenging."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

"The price is affordable."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Datamatics TruBot?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Datamatics TruBot?

The tool is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Datamatics TruBot?

The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required. The integration capabilities of the product have some concerns and need improvements. The p...

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 56% of the time

Blue Prism Cloud vs Datamatics TruBot

Compared 44% of the time

More Datamatics TruBot Competitors

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 18% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 8% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download Datamatics TruBot product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

January 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

TruBot

Kryon RPA

Overview

TruBot is a proprietary product for Robotic Process Automation. It is a team of virtual assistants that automates repetitive and rule-based processes without any manual intervention. When powered with Artificial Intelligence, it can recognize and replicate human actions, creating a smarter bot that can make informed decisions. TruBot is sector agnostic and can be deployed across Banking, Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, and Logistics.

Datamatics TruBot - https://trubot.datamatics.com/

Datamatics

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Aditya Birla Sunlife Insurance Company, IndusInd Bank

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Free Report: Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Datamatics TruBot vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.