We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"User alerts are very helpful for knowing when work is required."
"The interface is easy to navigate."
"Team Foundation Server (TFS) is easy to use, and we have a complete trail and traceability. We also like the access control part."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"We use TFS for forecast management."
"The most valuable features of TFS are the test plans. We can reproduce reusable test plans in test automation. We have a lot of queries and this feature is very useful."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"It has been really dated. When you start to work more in an agile environment, it is not really that flexible. They tried to replicate the look and feel of Jira, but it is not quite there. It was nice to use in the past, but it is not as flexible now with the changing development environments and methodologies."
"The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online."
"The user interface could improve and test management was not useful in TFS."
"Its pricing could be improved."
"I'd like to see some kind of visualization tool for TFS that would make life much easier."
"We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 93 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.