We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"Can design apps quickly and can connect to any database."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"The model that allows you to establish flow automation is getting a lot of traction from the customer side. It offers a lot of flexibility."
"The platform has valuable features for opportunity and finance management. It has all the essential features for customer service."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"The availability of templates needs to be improved. I understand that the ecosystem around it is still developing, but we need more templates. I would like the entire ecosystem around it to improve. I would recommend adding AI components. Even though we can always connect to Azure for AI components, they should slowly start looking at adding some AI components to PowerApps so that out-of-the-box learning can be applied to process flows. Salesforce has the Einstein layer that works along with license platforms. PowerApps should also have something similar."
"It would be beneficial to have a feature that allows users to split the opportunity into separate logs for each product."
"Its user interface can be better. It is good, but it can be a bit clunky."
"The user interface is pretty good, although it is a little bit clunky and can be improved."
"The solution is evolving very fast and every month new features are introduced. Sometimes it's difficult to catch up with all the evolution that's happening. I had to focus on Power BI for a while and left PowerApps at the side for a couple of months and when I came back, it had changed its interface and moved components around."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.