CoreStack vs Hyperglance comparison

CoreStack and Hyperglance are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. CoreStack is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hyperglance is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. CoreStack holds a 1.1% mindshare in CCM, compared to Hyperglance’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CoreStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyperglance users who would recommend it.

CoreStack

Read 4 CoreStack reviews

269 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyperglance

Read 5 Hyperglance reviews

348 Views
111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CoreStack

Hyperglance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2025

CoreStack and Hyperglance are cloud management platforms designed to enhance operational efficiency and cost optimization. CoreStack seems to have the upper hand in regulatory compliance and resource optimization, while Hyperglance is stronger in real-time visualization and mapping features.

Features: CoreStack provides multi-cloud governance, compliance automation, cost management, and security monitoring. Its capabilities make it ideal for enterprises needing extensive policy and regulation oversight. Hyperglance offers 3D infrastructure visualization, automated topology mapping, and interactive dashboards for strong visual insights and analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreStack is recognized for straightforward deployment processes and robust customer support. Its service is often seen as more proactive in issue resolution. Hyperglance provides a relatively smooth deployment with advanced visual analytics support, although it may require a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: CoreStack's pricing model is competitive, focusing on high ROI through automation and efficiency improvements. Hyperglance, perceived as a premium service, delivers strong value for organizations prioritizing visual data representation and infrastructure awareness. CoreStack's cost benefits align with enterprises focused on compliance and governance, while Hyperglance's ROI appeals to those leveraging real-time visualization for strategic insights.

To learn more, read our detailed CoreStack vs. Hyperglance Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack vs. Hyperglance

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CoreStack

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyperglance

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CoreStack is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyperglance is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyperglance	0.7%
CoreStack	1.1%
Other	98.2%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783919

Associate Vice President at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Cost reports have driven accurate AWS workload optimization and continue to guide savings

I can suggest improvements for CoreStack, especially regarding reporting periods. I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%. I have concerns about needed improvements primarily regarding AWS. If a customer is running ten virtual machines and one machine has a maximum of 1% utilization, it is considered as an idle instance in the report, which completely ignores that particular machine. This should not be the approach.

Read full review

Sivasai sudhakar

Vp at Zensar Technologies

Overcoming complex deployment has improved cloud cost control and automated security checks

We have been using Hyperglance for quite a while now, but the features which I personally feel are my personal favorites are that it supports a multi-cloud environment. It can work over Azure, AWS, GCP, and Kubernetes APIs for management unification. Apart from that, it also provides good real-time visualization, interactive diagrams, and dependency mapping for all the resources, which is a great thing. If we are able to map the dependencies at the right time, we are able to identify any issues. It also helps us to automate the recommendations for cost savings, trend analysis, and anomaly detection, which is again a great thing. Codeless automations for fixing common issues and optimizing resources is again a great feature of Hyperglance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CoreStack has positively impacted my organization by saving hours of time for reporting—for example, the governance report which my employees used to take at least four hours for one customer, and since I'm sending out 20 reports every month, that equates to 80 hours, thus saving me two man-weeks every month and approximately $8,000 in pure savings if I estimate $100 an hour for my architect."

"Currently, I think CoreStack is the best FinOps tool available in the market, which is why we are using it."

"My advice for others looking into using CoreStack is that anyone who is looking to optimize their workload cost for public cloud services should start using CoreStack because of the reports and granularity it produces to optimize cost, which will benefit them."

"Mainly through improved cost visibility and optimization with CoreStack, we have achieved a good ROI, and for some customers we were able to achieve more than forty percent cost savings by identifying unused and idle resources in their accounts, leading to significant cost savings after we completed the cleanup of those resources."

"Hyperglance has helped us to save on the cost of cloud through waste reduction, saving around 38% in cloud cost, improving work efficiency with real-time compliance checks by around 78% time saving, and enhancing visibility while automating the fixing of costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our ROI on system failures and technology breaches."

"Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provided a visual representation of our cloud resources and usage, showing which EC2 instances were underutilized or overprovisioned, and recommended resizing the instances based on actual usage, which led to a reduction of 30% to 35% in cloud spending."

"Hyperglance has helped our team replace the piecemeal solution and tedious manual documentation we used to do, providing automation for compliance and cost optimization, proving to be a time saver and directly reducing cloud waste."

"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."

Cons

"I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%."

"I believe CoreStack already has very good features in the governance and security parts, but stability can definitely be improved."

"I give it an eight because, as I mentioned, a few things from the billing operations need to be added, and we need more security features, particularly since the market is increasingly demanding better security tools for cloud management platforms, including cloud security posture assessments."

"The cost for small businesses is the main concern."

"The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved."

"The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments."

"The current limitations in Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are heavily focused on cloud environments and may not offer the same visibility in hybrid infrastructure."

"The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Insurance Company

62%

Transportation Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreStack?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty good because we received private pricing, which I cannot disclose. The setup was included as a one-time expense, and licensing is str...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreStack?

CoreStack can improve by adding a segregation of reserved instances that are shared across child accounts or managed accounts from the parent account, ensuring a cost allocation for all reserved in...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreStack?

My main use case for CoreStack is for cost optimization and billing operations, and I'm using it a bit for SecOps and CloudOps, but majorly for FinOps and BillOps. A specific example of how I use C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyperglance?

The metering and billing experience with Hyperglance has been excellent, providing a robust pay-as-you-go model where we pay only for the services we require, allowing us flexibility based on our n...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyperglance?

Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a ver...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyperglance?

Hyperglance is known for its excellent visual interactive dashboards that provide a real-time overview of multi-cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes, which makes it signifi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spot vs CoreStack

Compared 38% of the time

CloudCheckr vs CoreStack

Compared 33% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CoreStack

Compared 30% of the time

More CoreStack Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack

January 2026

Download CoreStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyperglance

December 2025

Download Hyperglance product report

Overview

CoreStack® Enterprise Enables You to be agile and eliminate waste while proactively mitigating risks by making your cloud governance intelligent and autonomous. It applies Cloud-as-Code™ approach to govern the four critical components of your cloud

CoreStack

Hyperglance offers a comprehensive means to visualize, analyze, and optimize cloud infrastructures, providing users with critical insights that enhance operational efficiency and decision-making.

Designed for cloud environments, Hyperglance provides an interactive 3D visual representation of cloud architectures. This visualization aids IT professionals in identifying risks, managing performance, and optimizing resource use efficiently. The platform supports multi-cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, giving users the flexibility to monitor and manage resources across different platforms seamlessly.

What are the key features of Hyperglance?

3D Visualization: Delivers an interactive model of cloud resources, simplifying complexity and boosting understanding.
Multi-Cloud Support: Enables management across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, offering extensive flexibility.
Cost Analysis: Provides detailed insights into cloud spending, facilitating cost optimization strategies.
Security Monitoring: Identifies security vulnerabilities and compliance issues across cloud infrastructures.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines resource management, enhancing productivity.
Cost Reduction: Identifies overspending areas, supporting reductions in cloud expenditure.
Enhanced Security: Offers insights into potential risks, strengthening security posture.
Operational Transparency: Provides clear visualization of complex cloud setups, aiding decision-making.

Hyperglance is widely used across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and manage costs effectively. Healthcare relies on it for maintaining secure infrastructures, while retail uses it to optimize cloud resource allocations, enhancing overall efficiency.

Hyperglance

Sample Customers

CAMS

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack vs. Hyperglance

December 2025

Free Report: CoreStack vs. Hyperglance

Find out what your peers are saying about CoreStack vs. Hyperglance and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CoreStack vs. Hyperglance report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.