Centilytics vs CoreStack comparison

Centilytics and CoreStack are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Centilytics is ranked #61, while CoreStack is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3. Centilytics holds a 0.6% mindshare in CCM, compared to CoreStack’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CoreStack users are willing to recommend the solution.

Centilytics

196 Views
114 Comparison Views

CoreStack

Read 4 CoreStack reviews

269 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centilytics

CoreStack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Centilytics and CoreStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Apptio and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,490 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centilytics

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

61st

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (74th)

CoreStack

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Centilytics is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreStack is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CoreStack	1.1%
Centilytics	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Use Centilytics?

Leave a review

reviewer2783919

Associate Vice President at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Cost reports have driven accurate AWS workload optimization and continue to guide savings

I can suggest improvements for CoreStack, especially regarding reporting periods. I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%. I have concerns about needed improvements primarily regarding AWS. If a customer is running ten virtual machines and one machine has a maximum of 1% utilization, it is considered as an idle instance in the report, which completely ignores that particular machine. This should not be the approach.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreStack?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty good because we received private pricing, which I cannot disclose. The setup was included as a one-time expense, and licensing is str...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreStack?

CoreStack can improve by adding a segregation of reserved instances that are shared across child accounts or managed accounts from the parent account, ensuring a cost allocation for all reserved in...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreStack?

My main use case for CoreStack is for cost optimization and billing operations, and I'm using it a bit for SecOps and CloudOps, but majorly for FinOps and BillOps. A specific example of how I use C...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Spot vs CoreStack

Compared 37% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CoreStack

Compared 33% of the time

CloudCheckr vs CoreStack

Compared 30% of the time

More CoreStack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download Centilytics product report

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack

January 2026

Download CoreStack product report

Overview

Cloud Visibility acts as a single pane of glass for your multi-cloud infrastructure. It aggregates terabytes of your unstructured data into interactive graphical dashboards and customized reports that can be downloaded in various formats.

You can slice & dice the data using an advanced set of filters such as – account ids, subscriptions, services, regions, resource tags and much more.

Reduce your time and effort to analyze and charge back various business categories (such as cost-centers, applications or owners).

Centilytics

CoreStack® Enterprise Enables You to be agile and eliminate waste while proactively mitigating risks by making your cloud governance intelligent and autonomous. It applies Cloud-as-Code™ approach to govern the four critical components of your cloud

CoreStack

Sample Customers

Nasscom, LRN, Yoma Group

CAMS

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Apptio and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.