The platform's interface is technically dense and features a steep learning curve. New analysts and engineers on our team frequently feel completely overwhelmed by the filter-heavy dashboard widget layouts.
Hyperglance can be improved by providing a less steep learning curve. The UI is powerful, but it is complex for beginners. I faced issues initially, and the initial setup takes time. The initial setup requires significant time, and you need a basic understanding of Hyperglance from the start.
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design. They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it. The reason I did not give it a 10 is that they also need some improvements like resource handling; they can effectively manage environments, and also for licensing purposes.
Senior System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 10
Feb 26, 2026
There are areas that users often want improved. Deeper automation and remediation reduce manual effort and accelerate the resolution of common problems. More contextual and actionable topology maps improve clarity and make maps genuinely actionable for teams with mixed workloads. Customizable dashboards and reporting are needed because teams have different priorities, such as security versus cost versus uptime, and want dashboards tailored to them.
The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments. The initial setup and deployment could be a bit challenging. The setup process of Hyperglance could be easier, and the configuration of network access and permissions for cloud APIs could be done in a more streamlined manner. The deployment of Hyperglance was a bit tricky as it required network accesses and permissions for the cloud APIs. Our organization had multiple servers and everything was there, so it was a bit challenging for us. That can be improved.
Growth and Product Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Nov 22, 2025
Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a version with similar services at a lower price point could be beneficial. The cost for small businesses is the main concern. Apart from that, Hyperglance serves as a powerful asset for organizations needing visibility, automation, and control access across multi-cloud environments.
GTM engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 24, 2025
One area where Hyperglance could improve is performance speed when dealing with very large environments, as sometimes the visual maps take longer to load. The reporting could also be more customizable to fit different compliance frameworks. For future releases, it would be helpful to have deeper integration with more third-party security tools, enhanced alerting options, and expanded automation for remediation tasks. These additions would make the platform even more powerful for large-scale cloud management.
Hyperglance offers a comprehensive approach to managing multi-cloud environments, emphasizing cost optimization, resource visualization, and automation that enhance productivity and efficiency.Hyperglance is known for its ability to visualize and optimize multi-cloud infrastructures. It effectively manages cloud costs by delivering real-time spending insights and reduction opportunities, enhancing security compliance, and unifying resource management across platforms to prevent vendor...
The platform's interface is technically dense and features a steep learning curve. New analysts and engineers on our team frequently feel completely overwhelmed by the filter-heavy dashboard widget layouts.
The initial configuration is hectic, and it takes time to realize value gain.
Hyperglance can be improved by providing a less steep learning curve. The UI is powerful, but it is complex for beginners. I faced issues initially, and the initial setup takes time. The initial setup requires significant time, and you need a basic understanding of Hyperglance from the start.
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design. They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it. The reason I did not give it a 10 is that they also need some improvements like resource handling; they can effectively manage environments, and also for licensing purposes.
There are areas that users often want improved. Deeper automation and remediation reduce manual effort and accelerate the resolution of common problems. More contextual and actionable topology maps improve clarity and make maps genuinely actionable for teams with mixed workloads. Customizable dashboards and reporting are needed because teams have different priorities, such as security versus cost versus uptime, and want dashboards tailored to them.
The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved. Apart from that, everything else is really good.
The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments. The initial setup and deployment could be a bit challenging. The setup process of Hyperglance could be easier, and the configuration of network access and permissions for cloud APIs could be done in a more streamlined manner. The deployment of Hyperglance was a bit tricky as it required network accesses and permissions for the cloud APIs. Our organization had multiple servers and everything was there, so it was a bit challenging for us. That can be improved.
Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a version with similar services at a lower price point could be beneficial. The cost for small businesses is the main concern. Apart from that, Hyperglance serves as a powerful asset for organizations needing visibility, automation, and control access across multi-cloud environments.
One area where Hyperglance could improve is performance speed when dealing with very large environments, as sometimes the visual maps take longer to load. The reporting could also be more customizable to fit different compliance frameworks. For future releases, it would be helpful to have deeper integration with more third-party security tools, enhanced alerting options, and expanded automation for remediation tasks. These additions would make the platform even more powerful for large-scale cloud management.