CoreOS Clair vs JFrog Xray comparison

Red Hat and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Security category. Red Hat is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.0, while JFrog is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8. Red Hat holds a 0.5% mindshare in Container Security, compared to JFrog’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

CoreOS Clair

Read 2 CoreOS Clair reviews

503 Views
119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Xray

Read 8 JFrog Xray reviews

3,038 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CoreOS Clair

JFrog Xray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

CoreOS Clair and JFrog Xray are competing products in the container security and vulnerability analysis category. CoreOS Clair seems to have the upper hand in user-friendly integration with CI/CD pipelines, while JFrog Xray stands out for its comprehensive security features despite its higher price.

Features: CoreOS Clair is praised for its effective vulnerability scanning, seamless integration with container environments, and user-friendly ease of use. JFrog Xray offers extensive security features, deep recursive scanning, compliance enforcement, and multi-layer analysis.

Room for Improvement: CoreOS Clair could enhance its reporting capabilities, expand database coverage, and improve analytics. JFrog Xray users recommend improving performance speed, better integration with third-party tools, and addressing interoperability issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreOS Clair receives positive feedback for straightforward deployment and effective documentation. JFrog Xray is noted for responsive support and detailed setup guidance.

Pricing and ROI: CoreOS Clair is cost-effective with a good balance of features to price. JFrog Xray is more expensive, but the investment pays off due to its extensive capabilities, making it worth the higher cost for comprehensive security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CoreOS Clair

Ranking in Container Security

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Xray

Ranking in Container Security

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Xray is 3.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Felipe Giffu

Red Hat Solution Architect at Seprol Computadores e Sistemas

An operational system, similar to Linux where you can run your applications inside containers

With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers. When you mentioned using Nacula as part of your CI/CD pipeline, it means your application is deployed and managed automatically through the CI/CD process. Containers are used to deploy your application within this pipeline, but CoreOS does not run inside these containers. Instead, CoreOS is the base operating system that supports and manages these containers.

Read full review

Sai Pradeep Koneti

DevOps Engineer Intern at University of Nebraska at Omaha

Goes deep into the docker files and find out vulnerabilities

When we were trying to get it up and working initially, I found it a bit hard to go through JFrog Xray's documentation and get my error solved. I was facing some issues because we hadn't got a specific license for the tool, but I was able to access it. As a regular user, I regularly saw an error message saying that the license feature was unavailable for my subscription. After a couple of days, I realized I was missing a license. I had to go back to the JFrog Xray team, who provided me with the new license, and then I could complete the setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers."

"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."

"Good reporting functionalities."

"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."

"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."

"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."

"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

More JFrog Xray pros

Cons

"It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue."

"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."

"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."

"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."

"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."

"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."

"X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL."

"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."

"The out-of-the-box PostgreSQL provided is not stable, which is why we are considering enterprise support."

"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."

More JFrog Xray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreOS Clair?

If you work with CoreOS or OpenShift, you don't need to pay for CoreOS separately. When you pay for OpenShift, you get CoreOS included, so you don't need to pay for the operating system separately....

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?

It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreOS Clair?

We use the tool to manage and secure the event file system. CoreOS Clair is an operational system that is very similar to Linux and offers benefits to other Linux operating systems. One major advan...

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Xray?

JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Xray?

X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL. More support during troubleshooting sessions would also be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Xray?

Our primary use case for X-ray includes multiple activities such as security and vulnerability scanning. We already use Black Duck for these purposes, and we are evaluating how JFrog Xray can offer...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 18% of the time

Trivy vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 16% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 12% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 8% of the time

More CoreOS Clair Competitors

Black Duck vs JFrog Xray

Compared 14% of the time

Trivy vs JFrog Xray

Compared 14% of the time

Veracode vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Dependabot vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

More JFrog Xray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

May 2025

Download CoreOS Clair product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Xray

June 2025

Download JFrog Xray product report

Also Known As

No data available

JFrog Security Essentials

Overview

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Red Hat

JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].

If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.

As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"

JFrog

Sample Customers

eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce

google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook

Buyer's Guide

CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray

June 2025

Free Report: CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray

Find out what your peers are saying about CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CoreOS Clair vs. JFrog Xray report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.