Arcserve UDP vs Cohesity Data Cloud comparison

Arcserve and Cohesity are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0, while Cohesity is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.7. Arcserve holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to Cohesity’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cohesity users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 43 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,352 Views
1,343 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

532 Views
285 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

Cohesity Data Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and Cohesity Data Cloud compete in the data protection and management category. Cohesity Data Cloud appears stronger due to its innovative capabilities, though Arcserve UDP is noted for cost-effectiveness, particularly for smaller businesses.

Features: Arcserve UDP offers comprehensive backup and recovery options, a simple setup process, and effective ransomware protection. Users of Cohesity Data Cloud highlight its seamless integration, scalability, and advanced data management functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Users of Arcserve UDP point to the need for a more intuitive interface, enhanced reporting tools, and user-friendly navigation. Cohesity Data Cloud users suggest improving initial setup complexity, optimizing update deployment times, and providing better onboarding documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arcserve UDP is generally praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Cohesity Data Cloud receives mixed reviews regarding deployment ease but is commended for its knowledgeable support team.

Pricing and ROI: Arcserve UDP is recognized for its competitive pricing and a decent return on investment, particularly advantageous for smaller enterprises. Cohesity Data Cloud, while more expensive, is perceived to provide higher ROI due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

39th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (35th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

TeresitaSabile

Head of Operation and IT at Elgrade Inc

Cost savings and efficient decompression but needs better cloud integration

Our primary use case for Arcserve UDP is its decompression feature, which helped us save money by reducing storage needs. Despite moving to cloud applications, we have been using Arcserve UDP for backup and disaster recovery Arcserve UDP has helped our organization save considerable amounts of…

Read full review

AmarpreetSingh

Technical Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI

The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the replication to the cloud and the deduplication."

"The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that I can by just one click, copy and paste anything that I would want. I do not have to restore the whole virtual machine."

"The ease of use is the best feature of the product."

"The most valuable feature of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is the speed and the compression of the backups. The compressed backed-up files do not take up as much storage. Additionally, the incremental backups can be done in one minute and be backed up on a disc very fast."

"The ROI is very good because of the speed of the backup."

"It is easy to configure."

"The product's deployment process was straightforward."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"It is easy to install and use."

"It's very regimented and fast. It does local backup, cloud backup, long-term coverage, and disaster recovery."

"Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."

"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."

"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."

"We use Cohesity Helios primarily in our data management strategy for backup and reporting."

"Our data center size occupancy for Cohesity appliance is reduced by 70% when we installed Cohesity."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

Cons

"The solution can use a lot of bandwidth when the scheduling is not done, it should auto-schedule itself. For example, if there are 50 users connected in the network at 12 o'clock and the backup is not scheduled. At this time the network offices are going to have performance issues when it is doing a backup. Having a feature to auto-schedule a time when the network is not being used often would be beneficial."

"We cannot restore each user's mailbox. Each user's mailbox should be independently restorable. Also, this solution is very slow. If you select all of the servers, it runs for a long time... It needs to be faster. Finally, If anything happens to one server we should be able to switch to another server."

"It takes much time to verify and consolidate images for backups."

"One of the biggest drawbacks of Arcserve UDP is that it does not have a single console, making it an area that needs to be considered for improvement."

"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."

"I think that the price could still be a bit cheaper and I do not like that they have been purchased by Arcserve."

"The only problem with the solution is that when I change the drive capacity, it has to do a full backup. It's a problem when I have five servers to backup. When I only want to change the size of the drive, I have to do a full backup that can take one week."

"We could not go into granular details of retrieving backup information."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"Their documentation portal is not up to date for newer releases and I strongly recommend Cohesity to increase their efforts on the documentation portal."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the product can be considered to be reasonable enough for the Asian region."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four or five out of ten."

"Pricing is most likely comparable."

"There is an annual license required for this solution and it is priced well."

"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."

"As an MSP partner, I believe that the prices are fair."

"The licensing cost is for one year. There are not any hidden costs involved in the pricing model of the solution."

"We only have the maintenance of three standard UDP licenses. Each license is 50 Euro. There are some additional costs for the storage and software but it has nothing to do with the UDP."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"It's priced properly for the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Non Profit

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Pricing for SPX MRP/MSP is under $400 per server (Single VM) with a 1-year subscription. After discounts, it could decrease by 20%-30%, and opting for a 3/5/10 server pack may offer even better (lo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 35% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 12% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 9% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

Arcserve Backup vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

July 2025

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

July 2025

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. Cohesity Data Cloud report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.