We performed a comparison between Cloudian HyperStore and Pure Storage FlashBlade based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, MinIO, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage."The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the rewrite speed and the nonstop services."
"The most valuable features are the Metro clustering, and disaster recovery."
"It performs well and it is also very fast."
"The main feature I have found to be product replication."
"It is very easy to use, and it is very fast."
"The product is scalable and easy to expand."
"The snapshots, replication, and the ability to have immutable blades are the most valuable features. You're putting data snapshots out in those blades, and they cannot be touched. Its performance is great."
"The onboarding and integrated monitoring tools are pretty good."
"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."
"An area for improvement in Pure Storage FlashBlade is its price. It could be reduced. The technical support for Pure Storage FlashBlade also needs improvement. It used to be good, with more experienced engineers. Nowadays, it isn't, and it takes longer for support to solve problems."
"I would like to see the licensing fees improved as well as the price per terabytes."
"There could be improvements in public cloud integration."
"It would be nice if you could store file-based in the same box with the same technology."
"It usually comes down to just what you hit and the value you're getting when you spend the money and license the products. I would always go, "If you want to make things better, lower your price and make your licensing simpler." There's always an opportunity around that."
"The solution is expensive."
"I want efficiency. FlashBlade doesn't have efficiency now."
"There is some room for new features related to authentication and integration with Kubernetes, and other solution using S3 Bucket."
Cloudian HyperStore is ranked 14th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while Pure Storage FlashBlade is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 9 reviews. Cloudian HyperStore is rated 6.0, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cloudian HyperStore writes "Reasonably priced, but the stability needs to be improved and it is difficult to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashBlade writes "Immutable snapshots, great performance, and simple and easy replication". Cloudian HyperStore is most compared with Dell ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp StorageGRID, IBM Cloud Object Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, MinIO, Qumulo, Red Hat Ceph Storage and VAST Data.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
