CloudCheckr vs HPE GreenLake comparison

Spot - A Flexera company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Managed Cloud Services category. Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #7 with an average rating of 6.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. Spot - A Flexera company holds a 2.6% mindshare in MCS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 31.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Spot - A Flexera company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

924 Views
9 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake

Read 13 HPE GreenLake reviews

2,676 Views
241 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

HPE GreenLake

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr and HPE GreenLake based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed Cloud Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (28th), Cloud Cost Management (11th)

HPE GreenLake

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Consumption Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed Cloud Services category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE GreenLake is 31.6%, up from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Cloud Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE GreenLake	31.6%
CloudCheckr	2.6%
Other	65.8%

Managed Cloud Services

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

MohamedKhairy

Co-Founder & Enterprise Solutions Architect at Qtopia Tech. Solutions

Robust scalability and flexibility in managing workflow

There is a need for improved support in HPE GreenLake, including more administrators and engineers to provide faster resolution for issues. Storage issues can impact the entire data center, especially in virtualization environments where multiple virtual machines are connected. Availability of hardware and timely monitoring have been reported as a problem, with some difficulties in obtaining hardware due to limited stock in the local market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The most valuable feature for me is the ability to perform backups with a graphical user interface (GUI). It makes the process easy."

"It is the flexible way to pay for everything that you need and pay as you go."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to grow into a lower price point at some point in time."

"Absolute flexibility for scaling storage needs on demand."

"We have a service and cost model based on utilization for specific KPIs, measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption. This approach has allowed us to manage and optimize utilization and consumption effectively."

"The solution integrates well with Dell, Cisco switches, or other switches."

"It offers businesses the flexibility and scalability of the public cloud while having their infrastructure on-premises."

"It sort of lines up with our direction to move to the cloud. By using a hybrid cloud service to get us there, this allows us to run our legacy workloads on-premise. Those which are not really suited to a proper cloud."

More HPE GreenLake pros

Cons

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"HPE GreenLake can improve by making some of the user's experience better. It can take some time to learn."

"The interconnects were a challenge originally, but they sorted that out, and It was fine. We did have to spend a bit more money."

"Part of the integration, with cutting things over to Unisys, may have hurt us a bit. We had a couple of rough implementations earlier this year. Part of that was due to some internal system changes on HPE's side. We are keeping an eye on this to make sure it doesn't happen again."

"Both times that we've had to increase the hardware, the deployment took way longer than expected. In addition, we haven't yet gotten to a use point where the cost is below what it would cost us to provision the same set of services on HPE hardware outside of the GreenLake service."

"Unfortunately, HPE GreenLake can be sold only in Bahrain, UAE, and the Middle East, meaning it can be sold in only three or four countries because it requires certain approvals from countries where it has to be used."

"There could be better monitoring of growth and threshold usage so users could be more aware when their billing will change."

"The time to receive a price when I am going to a proposal is too long."

"There is a need for improved support in HPE GreenLake, including more administrators and engineers to provide faster resolution for issues."

More HPE GreenLake cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"We have reduced a lot of our VMware licensing costs."

"It's a small cost per month compared to that one-time purchase. The big thing is if you get your one-time purchase wrong, then you are buying a lot more. With GreenLake, if we miss estimate (which with all the planning, you usually don't), we sign a piece of paper, and then they send more equipment in."

"Our first year costs were approximately $1.2 million instead of spending five to six million dollars."

"If you're used to buying HPE servers, it's less expensive than that. I don't really compare competitor servers because HPE has never given me any reason to look otherwise. However, if you get good pricing on HPE servers, you get better pricing on GreenLake."

"In terms of pricing, it's a bit on the higher side."

"Right now we're paying about $180,000 per year."

"Pricing is based on usage plateaus. The more you use, the more you pay."

"HPE GreenLake has been growing in popularity due to its subscription model. The flexibility of the solution allows it to adapt to the changing market trends towards more edge performance and workloads."

More HPE GreenLake pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE GreenLake?

The solution's technical support does an excellent job.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake?

We had a service and cost model established on utilization for specific KPIs, and we were measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake?

I am still struggling with monitoring, particularly with OpsRamp, which is not fully customized to our needs, especially for disaster recovery. In our scenario, we define a disaster recovery test c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Dell APEX vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 75% of the time

Pure Storage Evergreen One vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Open Pay vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 12% of the time

More HPE GreenLake Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

October 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake

September 2025

Download HPE GreenLake product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

GreenLake Flex Capacity, HPE Flexible Capacity, HPE FlexCap

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Flexible Capacity from HPE Pointnext offers on-demand capacity, combining the agility and economics of public cloud with the security and performance of on-premises IT. With advanced metering, customers pay monthly for actual capacity used, above a minimum commitment – by core, by terabyte, by virtual machine – with no up-front capital outlay. HPE provides a buffer of capacity on-premises and ready for use, which you pay for only when you start to use. Active capacity management ensures that the buffer is replenished before it runs out, so that you have the servers, storage, networking, and operating software that you need, and ensuring that you are ready to take on your next project or next customer. Flexible Capacity cuts overprovisioning – commonly as much as 50-60% of servers and storage – saving on IT cost, enabling faster time to value and eliminating the typical long purchasing cycle. And it includes support for your IT environment to simplify how you operate IT.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Capgemini Finland Infrastructure Services, Sogeti BeLux, Accenture

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake

September 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. HPE GreenLake report.

See our list of best Managed Cloud Services vendors.

We monitor all Managed Cloud Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.