Cisco UCS Manager vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Cisco and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #59. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,710 Views
1,429 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

379 Views
288 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Goliath Performance Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete within the IT infrastructure management sector. Goliath Performance Monitor is preferred for its simplicity and ease of use, while Cisco UCS Manager stands out for its comprehensive feature set in complex network environments.

Features: Goliath Performance Monitor provides detailed analytics, real-time performance tracking, and quick issue resolution. Cisco UCS Manager offers enterprise-level management, robust server configuration, and optimization features suitable for large data centers.

Room for Improvement: Goliath Performance Monitor could enhance its integration with diverse IT systems, expand its reporting capabilities, and improve scalability for larger environments. Cisco UCS Manager might benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing deployment complexity, and offering more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor offers easy deployment and responsive support, focusing on minimizing setup time and swift issue resolution. Cisco UCS Manager involves a more complex setup due to its extensive features, requiring advanced IT knowledge but provides comprehensive management capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Goliath Performance Monitor has a lower initial setup cost and delivers quicker ROI through direct troubleshooting. Cisco UCS Manager, with a higher setup cost, provides long-term ROI by managing larger infrastructures efficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it gives a GUI interface and a CLI."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."

"The flexibility and the ease in which the features can be expanded are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"It's robust."

"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

"Offers a diversity of features."

Cons

"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"The automation within the solution needs to be simplified."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

"Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Healthcare Company

20%

University

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 83% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 9% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

May 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

April 2025

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.