Goliath Performance Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete within the IT infrastructure management sector. Goliath Performance Monitor is preferred for its simplicity and ease of use, while Cisco UCS Manager stands out for its comprehensive feature set in complex network environments.
Features: Goliath Performance Monitor provides detailed analytics, real-time performance tracking, and quick issue resolution. Cisco UCS Manager offers enterprise-level management, robust server configuration, and optimization features suitable for large data centers.
Room for Improvement: Goliath Performance Monitor could enhance its integration with diverse IT systems, expand its reporting capabilities, and improve scalability for larger environments. Cisco UCS Manager might benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing deployment complexity, and offering more intuitive navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor offers easy deployment and responsive support, focusing on minimizing setup time and swift issue resolution. Cisco UCS Manager involves a more complex setup due to its extensive features, requiring advanced IT knowledge but provides comprehensive management capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: Goliath Performance Monitor has a lower initial setup cost and delivers quicker ROI through direct troubleshooting. Cisco UCS Manager, with a higher setup cost, provides long-term ROI by managing larger infrastructures efficiently.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco UCS Manager | 1.2% |
| Goliath Performance Monitor | 0.3% |
| Other | 98.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
