Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Claroty Platform comparison

"The URL filtering is very good and you can create a group for customized URLs."

"In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well."

"It has a huge rate of protection, a low level of positives, is easy to deploy and implement, has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions, and has a good support channel and technical assistance."

"The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet."

"It simplifies the configuration process by offering pre-defined base configurations, including security and connectivity settings."

"The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates."

"I would recommend this solution; it's reliable and scalable, with easy installation and integration."

"There are a lot of features that I really appreciate with Firepower, which is why I advise most of my customers to go with Firepower."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"I have had a very good experience with the Claroty Platform."

"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."

"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."

"Their SRA solution, the Secure Remote Access solution, is very useful for industrial environments."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."

"The customization of the rules can be simplified."

"I want to see a better dashboard for the product. The dashboard can be a bit modified or enhanced."

"If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy."

"Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody."

"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."

"Introducing an AI chatbot to assist you when you have doubts could be beneficial."

"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."