Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Juniper Logo
4,957 views|3,435 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
27,723 views|21,294 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Juniper Logo
8,749 views|6,272 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is praised for its stability, performance, and visibility, with exceptional customer service and reasonable pricing. Mist AI and Cloud stand out for their intuitive interface, AI-driven analytics, and proactive troubleshooting, with positive ROI and responsive customer support. Areas of improvement for both include network stability, reliability, and user interface enhancements.

Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers stability, good performance, complete visibility, easy setup, user-friendly interface, cloud management, and device control. Mist AI and Cloud prioritize intuitive UI, easy setup, seamless integration, AI-driven analytics, proactive troubleshooting for faster problem resolution, and improved network performance.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is reported to be minimal and straightforward, while Mist AI and Cloud also offer a manageable setup cost. Both products have straightforward licensing processes, contributing to a positive user experience., The ROI for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has been positive, with improved network performance and enhanced security. Mist AI and Cloud have also provided significant returns on investment, with increased efficiency and cost savings. Both solutions offer valuable features and capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has room for improvement in signal strength, network stability, user interface, compatibility, firmware updates, and customer support. Mist AI and Cloud need enhancements in performance, reliability, system delays, disruptions, interface intuitiveness, and user-friendliness.

Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN indicate that the duration for establishing a new tech solution can vary, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. In contrast, the reviews for Mist AI and Cloud also mention three months for deployment and a week for setup, but suggest that these timeframes should be considered separately in some cases., The customer service of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for its exceptional support, promptness, and effectiveness. Customers appreciate the knowledgeable staff and their helpful guidance in resolving issues efficiently. On the other hand, Mist AI and Cloud have received positive feedback for their availability, responsiveness, prompt guidance, and expert assistance, contributing to a positive user experience.

The summary above is based on 61 interviews we conducted recently with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Answer: Had so many problems with Meraki in the past 5 years. I wouldn't recommend them to anybody. The last problem was intermittent problems connecting to an SSID, the helpdesk answer was: "make the password less complex". It was passw0rd. Roaming always seems to break whenever they do an update. One time it took more than a year to fix the issues, couldn't upgrade the firmware for more than a year. Every time I reported a problem, they wanted to upgrade our firmware, but they hadn't fixed the roaming problem. Wifi works so much better now when we moved away from Meraki. Plus, we don't have to pay the license fee anymore.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system.""The solution is pretty generic and easy to use.""The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done.""The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence.""It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices.""The solution is stable.""In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich.""You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pros →

"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting.""It is easy to set up. You can do everything on the GUI. You don't need to trace cables. You don't need to connect to the switch. Everything is there, right in front of you.""Allows for cloud-based management of your Wi-Fi network.""Great architecturally based dashboard and the solution is accessible from anywhere.""The most valuable features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN are the ease of use and the ability to manage it from the cloud.""Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a user-friendly solution that has good performance and stability.""The most valuable feature is the technology of the security that is offered.""The management console is valuable."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Pros →

"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building.""AI is the most valuable feature.""Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive.""Mist AI and Cloud is the best solution I have seen in the industry, especially from the artificial intelligence perspective, as it helps businesses.""Mist AI and Cloud have definitely improved the functioning of our organization. The access to the Internet, including its speed and reliability, has significantly improved.""The Marvis feature of Mist AI, an artificial intelligence tool, is very useful.""Natural language patching is an important feature.""It's really easy to provision and support. Those are its main features."

More Mist AI and Cloud Pros →

Cons
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release.""There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation.""Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement.""I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features.""The pricing should be made cheaper.""Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems.""The pricing is very high in the Indian market.""If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Cons →

"It would be better if they enable full integration with Cisco's cloud-based network in the next release.""The way Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN groups certain things, as far as the devices for either monitoring and or configuring them should be done better. They should be grouped a little bit differently because if I want to configure something, a different setting on an SSID, I have to go to their specific area where I would have thought it should be clumped as a dropdown menu in another area.""There could be more functionality.""In the next release, I would like to see the central control plane have the flexibility to control and distribute policies to all LAN networks, balance the traffic, and the performance based on application monitoring.""The only concern is when the license has expired and it will no longer function, the entire network goes down, without any notification, or warning.""The user interface needs to be improved.""Integration with the corporate LAN where Catalyst products are installed is a major challenge.""There needs to be some work done on security because, with time, some viruses may emerge that one may not know about."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Cons →

"Mist AI and Cloud should be marketed more and focus on making partners in the industry.""Regarding opportunities for improvement in Mist, it is notable for its robust cloud portal and integration of artificial intelligence into various services, creating a highly efficient environment for work. However, a drawback lies in the cost associated with its WiFi offerings. With a pricing range of twelve hundred to fifteen hundred dollars for a single Access Point, exclusive of the subscription, it is acknowledged as a relatively expensive solution in the realm of WiFi services. Despite this drawback, the positive attributes of Mist make it a noteworthy option.""The solution has various licensing policies. It will be easy to use if it is an open single license.""The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly.""In future releases, they need to add some router models. Because currently, it supports only SSR and WAN routers. But adding other routers would be good.""There could be more integration.""The solution doesn't provide mail notifications currently.""If there's one thing I'd like to change, it's the pricing. They are quite expensive, but honestly, it's justified by the value they provide. However, for a simple Wi-Fi connectivity with basic security needs, there are alternatives in the market that offer comparable features at a more budget-friendly price."

More Mist AI and Cloud Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."
  • "Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
  • "The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."
  • "The pricing is too high."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
  • More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Negotiate the deal put in front of you!"
  • "At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these."
  • "​If you are wondering if Meraki can work for you, contact one of their representatives because they will do onsite trials where you can set up their system. If it does not work, you can send it back to them for no charge.​​"
  • "The price is negotiable."
  • "It's a pretty good value, but not great. Pricing is on a yearly basis for the Meraki solution."
  • "The price is good, but it could be improved."
  • "You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."
  • "The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."
  • More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this product is approximately the same as competing products in the market."
  • "The price is about the same compared to other vendors. There is an add-on license, but it's up to you if you want to buy it or not."
  • "The price of Mist AI and Cloud is approximately 20 percent less than competitors, such as Aruba and Cisco. However, Cisco has a lifetime warranty for its solutions."
  • "The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."
  • "Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."
  • "I rate the pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."
  • "The custom licensing is a little bit expensive and I would rate it 7.5 out of 10."
  • "The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."
  • More Mist AI and Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment.
    Top Answer:I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very high in the Indian market. Eight to nine OEMs are also available in the market, giving you their… more »
    Top Answer:Depends.  I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them.  Extreme I am not, so unless they have… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a… more »
    Top Answer:The AI deployment process involves adding access points and placing them in the designated area. The AI system… more »
    Top Answer:Mist AI and Cloud need to improve the configuration speed.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
    MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
    Mist Access Points
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

    Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

    Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

    Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

    Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

    With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
    Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Newspaper13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Educational Organization10%
    Non Profit8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Real Estate/Law Firm14%
    Government14%
    Educational Organization14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company19%
    University5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 20 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ, Ruckus Wireless and Zabbix. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud report.

    See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.