Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Juniper is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 12.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 119 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

12,623 Views
10,448 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mist AI and Cloud

Read 23 Mist AI and Cloud reviews

3,237 Views
2,211 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mist AI and Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI compete in the wireless LAN solutions category. Mist AI appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced AI-driven capabilities, which provide superior network insights and troubleshooting efficiency.

Features: Cisco Meraki is commended for its centralized cloud management, ease of use, and simplified network visibility. Its cloud-managed architecture allows organizations to configure and monitor networks remotely without a physical controller. Mist AI offers advanced AI-driven features, notably Marvis, which assists in efficient troubleshooting. The platform provides detailed network analyses and insights, making it a powerful tool for managing network performance.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki is often criticized for high costs and licensing issues, lacking advanced features for larger enterprises. Users also note the need for enhanced error logs and security options. Mist AI, although highly functional, is seen as expensive and could improve in pricing and regional support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki offers flexibility with deployment in various cloud environments and is known for an easy setup process. Despite generally reliable customer service, some users report response delays. Mist AI provides strong support with clear guidance, though concerns over pricing persist.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki's high pricing and complex licensing can be challenging, impacting ROI through operational cost reduction and management simplicity. Despite higher costs, Mist AI undercuts competitors such as Cisco and Aruba by approximately 20%, offering reliable ROI through efficient network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

119

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mist AI and Cloud

Ranking in Wireless LAN

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 12.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mist AI and Cloud is 1.9%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Q&A Highlights

Chuck Serauskas

Network and Telecommunications Manager at Kwik Trip

Jun 02, 2022

Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Had so many problems with Meraki in the past 5 years. I wouldn't recommend them to anybody. The last problem was intermittent problems connecting to an SSID, the helpdesk answer was: "make the password less complex". It was passw0rd. Roaming always seems to break whenever they do an update. One time it took more than a year to fix the issues, couldn't upgrade the firmware for more than a year. Every time I reported a problem, they wanted to upgrade our firmware, but they hadn't fixed the roaming problem. Wifi works so much better now when we moved away from Meraki. Plus, we don't have to pay the license fee anymore.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

RezaPradipta

Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk

Streamline network management with a unified dashboard for seamless device integration

The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…

Read full review

RahulSivanandan

Network Manager at Bread LLC

Analytics and automation simplify wireless management and proactive troubleshooting

The analytics part of Mist AI and Cloud is really helpful, including correlation and event analysis. These features make Mist AI and Cloud stand out in the market. The automation capabilities are quite impressive, making it easy to manage and maintain. Mist AI and Cloud's orchestration is beneficial for troubleshooting and proactive analysis, offering proactive solutions before issues arise. Additionally, the platform is easy to deploy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."

"I like the record that is being kept and multiple SSDs."

"The most valuable features include key elements like creating SSIDs, networking configurations, and the ability to manage all devices through a single console."

"It is cloud-based. You can manage it remotely from anywhere in the world, and you don't have to be on-site, which is a very big advantage."

"Cisco's technical support is very good and better than other vendors."

"It makes the process much easier by providing visibility and centralized control over the network."

"Allows for cloud-based management of your Wi-Fi network."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"Natural language patching is an important feature."

"Ability to control the access points by groups."

"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."

"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"There are several valuable features. One of them is Cibas, and another one is Marvis."

"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building."

"Mist is a really good tool that provides essential AI information from an operational point of view, covering both wireless and switching."

"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."

More Mist AI and Cloud pros

Cons

"The solution's mobile application and management of dashboards are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"Licensing is, in my opinion, the least appealing component. It can be difficult to keep licenses up to date in order for the system to function properly."

"If there are advanced features that you can have enabled, they should allow users access to that in an easier manner."

"Some of their first level support staff does not seem to be well-versed in the solution, so support for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs improvement."

"We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."

"Technical support can be improved, as well as having more detailed capabilities to go without using an API."

"It would be good to integrate with ISE in the future."

"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed. Some of the rules are a bit more complicated. The switch ports on the routers are not individually addressable, in the sense that with a switch you can tell what MAC address is on what port but with the security appliances, you can't, which would be beneficial for troubleshooting."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"Regarding opportunities for improvement in Mist, it is notable for its robust cloud portal and integration of artificial intelligence into various services, creating a highly efficient environment for work. However, a drawback lies in the cost associated with its WiFi offerings. With a pricing range of twelve hundred to fifteen hundred dollars for a single Access Point, exclusive of the subscription, it is acknowledged as a relatively expensive solution in the realm of WiFi services. Despite this drawback, the positive attributes of Mist make it a noteworthy option."

"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."

"It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language."

"There is no local support for Mist in Brazil."

"Juniper should integrate all their dashboards instead of having separate dashboards...Since it lacks the integration of dashboards, Juniper needs to improve it."

"The support needs improvement. Since the merger or integration between Mist AI and Cloud and HP, it has affected service quality negatively."

"There are many aspects of AI, and how acquisitions are proceeding, particularly between Juniper and Aruba, remains unclear."

"Mist AI and Cloud should be marketed more and focus on making partners in the industry."

More Mist AI and Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is high and should be reduced."

"We pay a yearly license fee for the solution."

"The price is on the high side when compared to Aruba."

"Users have to pay a yearly license fee for the solution."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"Pricing could be better."

"I don't deal with pricing directly, however, it's my understanding that it is around $40 per unit."

"There are multiple licensing options including three months, six months, and one year."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."

"The price of this product is approximately the same as competing products in the market."

"Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."

"The annual cost is a significant issue for us, and it notably contributes to the overall price. We have a customer with nearly fifty-eight access points in a multifunctional building, and while the setup was relatively simple, the yearly licensing cost is substantial. For the specific features we utilize, the licensing amounts to about forty thousand euros annually. This is not a trivial expense and significantly impacts the overall cost, making it quite high."

"The price of Mist AI and Cloud is approximately 20 percent less than competitors, such as Aruba and Cisco. However, Cisco has a lifetime warranty for its solutions."

"The solution is expensive in Brazil."

"I rate the pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."

More Mist AI and Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mist AI and Cloud?

AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mist AI and Cloud?

Compared with other solutions, Mist AI and Cloud is not that expensive and is considered moderate in pricing. The solution is priced per device.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mist AI and Cloud?

The support needs improvement. Since the merger or integration between Mist AI and Cloud and HP, it has affected service quality negatively. The reachability, access, and response time of the suppo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 32% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 13% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Mist AI and Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

June 2025

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud

June 2025

Download Mist AI and Cloud product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mist Access Points

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Cisco

Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.