Cisco DNA Center vs Statseeker comparison

Cisco and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.4, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Cisco holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Cisco DNA Center

Read 43 Cisco DNA Center reviews

7,244 Views
2,101 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cisco DNA Center

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Cisco DNA Center compete in the network management solutions sector. Cisco DNA Center appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and automation capabilities, although it may be more costly.

Features: Statseeker offers real-time network monitoring, root cause analysis, and in-depth network performance visibility. Cisco DNA Center provides advanced automation, policy enforcement, and extensive network insights, suitable for large-scale enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its automation capabilities, expand integration options, and improve reporting features. Cisco DNA Center might benefit from simplified deployment procedures, reduced operational complexity, and more affordable pricing options for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for a straightforward deployment process and a responsive support team, minimizing disruption. Cisco DNA Center requires more resources during setup but offers extensive support tools post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker offers a lower setup cost, enabling quicker ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Cisco DNA Center's pricing aligns with its comprehensive capabilities, providing long-term value for those able to invest in extensive network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco DNA Center

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (1st), Network Automation (2nd)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco DNA Center is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco DNA Center	1.0%
Statseeker	0.4%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mahir Öztürk

Network Engineer at NGN Bilgi ve İletişim Hizmetleri

Client history has helped resolve past network issues more efficiently

I mostly use the client history feature of Cisco DNA Center. I didn't use the real-time monitoring capability of Cisco DNA Center because I primarily used it for client history regarding issues and problems. I don't use it for real-time monitoring. If there is a problem, I can inspect the situation and see what is happening, which is beneficial.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that we can easily configure any new hardware. It's also easy to deploy and easy to troubleshoot."

"The solution helps in user microsegmentation."

"It is very versatile in terms of analytics."

"Automation helps configure devices without manual intervention, enabling zero-touch provisioning."

"The best feature of Cisco DNA Center is the visibility page, where you can see everything on the dashboard, and you don't have to be a technical person to view the issues."

"People like to use the dashboards to get an overview of their network."

"The product's most valuable feature is the visual representation of the switch's front panel."

"The solution has the capability to scale."

More Cisco DNA Center pros

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"As a user, it would be good if I could plug in controllers, suites, and devices from other vendors to Cisco DNA Center."

"What I want to see in Cisco DNA Center in the future is more support for other platforms so that you can manage third-party products, such as Fortinet."

"DNA Center has been on the market for a few years and they need to update it."

"In my opinion, the client history in Cisco DNA Center can be longer than 10 days, perhaps extending to 15 or 20 days."

"The solution needs to improve the dashboard."

"It seems to be a little bit more centered toward wireless than wired. You've got more options you can do wirelessly than you can with the wired switches, but it works for what we need it to do. We would like to see a little bit more about the traffic, and we're looking at what's out there to see about that. We are looking at something that might give us a bit more insight into the actual traffic. If they had the full functionality on the wired side, as they do on the wireless side in terms of being able to view traffic and everything, it would be good."

"Cisco DNA Center was a new technology for us, at the beginning, it was not easy to do, but Cisco did a lot of training with us to a level we could handle everything. The team is managing itself now without the assistance of Cisco."

"I would like is to have a small information pointer available. It could be a plus feature that I want to implement. When I hover my mouse over the user interface, it should provide a brief explanation. It would be helpful to have it incorporated into the UI."

More Cisco DNA Center cons

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's a very expensive tool."

"Affordability is a problem because it's created for large enterprises only. So, some customers, even if their engineers want the solution, might have problems with budget limitations."

"The solution is a little bit expensive but depends a lot on the customer's usage. If you use it in the right place, you can easily pay for it."

"Our licensing agreement is for three years."

"The licensing cost for Cisco DNA Center is not more than that of other solutions."

"The price of the solution is expensive. The hardware is licensed on the device, but the hardware on the server is expensive."

"We get a yearly license at the time we buy the product."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

More Cisco DNA Center pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco DNA Center?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it gives some kind of ease in operations, especially since our company is moving from CLI to GUI-based configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco DNA Center?

After evaluating other solutions, we will provide feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco DNA Center?

In my opinion, the client history in Cisco DNA Center can be longer than 10 days, perhaps extending to 15 or 20 days. I am using it in a huge factory in Turkey, and sometimes I need to see what occ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Center vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 13% of the time

Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco DNA Center Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center

January 2026

Download Cisco DNA Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

DNA Center

No data available

Overview

Cisco DNA Center delivers powerful centralized security, automation, and comprehensive analytics for enhanced network management. With an intuitive dashboard and integration with Cisco devices, it reduces errors, boosts efficiency, and ensures seamless wired and wireless network operations.

Organizations leverage Cisco DNA Center for network management and automation, offering increased visibility into traffic flows and efficient device provisioning. It supports real-time data transmission, network segmentation, and integrates with ISE. Features like wireless assurance, centralized management, and AI-driven insights into network health promote an efficient network environment while addressing compliance issues. However, improvements are necessary for better third-party integration, affordability, and more user-friendly documentation.

What are the solution's most important features?

Comprehensive Analytics: Provides in-depth network insights through real-time data.
Centralized Security: Unifies security management, offering enhanced protection.
Network Management: Simplifies device configuration and policy compliance.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces human error and facilitates efficient network operations.
AI-Driven Assurance: Delivers insights into network health for proactive management.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations by reducing manual tasks.
Improved Security: Enhances protection through centralized policies.
Cost Effective: Simplifies management, potentially lowering operating costs.
Enhanced Visibility: Offers comprehensive data for better decision-making.

In industries like healthcare, finance, and education, Cisco DNA Center's advanced features facilitate the management of complex network infrastructures and aid in achieving compliance efficiently. Its ability to manage LANs and WLANs supports diverse networking environments including greenfield projects and SPN setups.

Cisco

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco DNA Center vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.