Cisco DNA Center vs DX NetOps comparison

Cisco and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Cisco DNA Center

Read 41 Cisco DNA Center reviews

1,823 Views
1,148 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Read 7 DX NetOps reviews

1,125 Views
665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco DNA Center

DX NetOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Cisco DNA Center and DX NetOps compete in the network management solutions space, with each product offering unique advantages. Cisco DNA Center holds an edge in networking and automation, while DX NetOps is stronger in performance management and analytics.

Features: Cisco DNA Center provides advanced automation and AI-driven assurance, offering comprehensive security policies for efficient network functionality. It includes features like seamless networking, intuitive tools, and streamlined operations. DX NetOps delivers extensive network visibility, real-time performance monitoring, and detailed analytics, aiding network optimization. Its features focus on deep analytical insights, robust network control, and comprehensive performance dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Cisco DNA Center could enhance its analytics capabilities, expand real-time monitoring tools, and improve custom reporting features. It might also benefit from reduced complexity in advanced configurations. DX NetOps could offer a more intuitive user interface, simplify its setup process, and reduce the need for specialized technical expertise for configuration. Additionally, enhancing scalability options for larger networks could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco DNA Center offers an integrated deployment approach, streamlining the process with dedicated support, which makes implementation straightforward. DX NetOps, while supported by detailed documentation, may require more technical proficiency during setup. However, it compensates with strong customer service options to assist with any challenges faced during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco DNA Center is usually at a higher price point initially, but its efficiency in automation may lead to substantial ROI over time. DX NetOps presents a lower initial setup cost but may demand ongoing investments in technical resources to realize its full potential. The main difference in financial consideration lies in Cisco's automation-driven cost savings potential versus the ongoing optimization investments required for DX NetOps.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco DNA Center

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (1st), Network Automation (2nd)

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco DNA Center is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AvrahamSonenthal

Senior Network Engineer at Inside Global

Efficiently manages our wireless network and provides valuable monitoring features

The platform's biggest benefit has been in managing our wireless network. Having a single pane of glass to control all wireless controllers and access points and to monitor activity has been a significant advantage. We're a small federal agency with around 300 network devices, so automation is a minor focus. It's more relevant for larger networks. The main benefits we've seen are in inventory management and the potential for configuration automation. However, I recommend using the DNA Centre only for larger networks with over a thousand devices; otherwise, it may not be cost-effective. Before proceeding, ensure that your devices are compatible with DNA Center, as not all Cisco devices are supported. Also, investing in proper training is different from plug-and-play. I rate it an eight.

Read full review

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can monitor all devices and get the required information using the product."

"It offers automation, security enforcement, analytics, and integration with other Cisco technologies, making it a key driver for efficient network operations and compliance with security protocols."

"People like to use the dashboards to get an overview of their network."

"The product offers an intuitive and automated way to manage user networks. It gives me an insight into the network health."

"The monitoring features are very useful for network engineers."

"The solution has the capability to scale."

"Has a good processing feature with a high level of accuracy."

"The automation features are significant, reducing configuration time. This means outstanding functionality. By deploying the controller automatically, the rest becomes automated"

More Cisco DNA Center pros

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The solution is stable."

Cons

"An area for improvement in Cisco DNA Center is the latency in data correlation. For example, sometimes, when an issue happens, and I check the logs, I can't find the corresponding log. There's a delay in log replication, so this is what needs improvement in Cisco DNA Center. Reporting in Cisco DNA Center could also be improved because it only has a few templates, and you can't customize it based on your requirements. There aren't many options available in Cisco DNA Center regarding reporting, versus Cisco Prime, which has excellent features for different levels of detailed reports. I'd like to see real-time data replication in the next release of Cisco DNA Center, similar to what's done in Meraki. Data in Meraki is real-time with no delay, so data is immediately replicated in the cloud. Currently, there's a lag in Cisco DNA Center, and addressing that lag is the enhancement I'd like to see in Cisco DNA Center. The solution also needs to be more user-friendly."

"The cost is very high."

"When it comes to deploying wireless fields, integrating defaults into the DNS interface can be challenging."

"As a user, it would be good if I could plug in controllers, suites, and devices from other vendors to Cisco DNA Center."

"The product has many features that do not work properly."

"Cisco DNA Center should improve its configuration management. It is better to have a dev version before pushing it."

"They should include UTM features in the product."

"I would like is to have a small information pointer available. It could be a plus feature that I want to implement. When I hover my mouse over the user interface, it should provide a brief explanation. It would be helpful to have it incorporated into the UI."

More Cisco DNA Center cons

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do know that Cisco does offer some really good promotions for DNA Center to bring the costs down."

"Cisco DNA Center is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The price could be better. It's a very expensive tool."

"Licensing for Cisco DNA Center is a little bit expensive, just like any Cisco solution. Its cost could still be improved."

"The product is very costly."

"The licensing cost for Cisco DNA Center is not more than that of other solutions."

"Affordability is a problem because it's created for large enterprises only. So, some customers, even if their engineers want the solution, might have problems with budget limitations."

More Cisco DNA Center pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco DNA Center?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it gives some kind of ease in operations, especially since our company is moving from CLI to GUI-based configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco DNA Center?

The cost is very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco DNA Center?

The system is working fine for me currently.

See all answers

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market. However, there are no extra expenses in addition to the standard licensing fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

It would be useful to have more AI features.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Center vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 11% of the time

Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 6% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco DNA Center Competitors

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 34% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 19% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 15% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center

May 2025

Download Cisco DNA Center product report

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

May 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Also Known As

DNA Center

No data available

Overview

Cisco DNA Center offers a comprehensive platform for network automation and management, providing detailed analytics, enhanced security, and streamlined operations for both wired and wireless networks.

Cisco DNA Center integrates with Cisco infrastructure to deliver efficient network automation and management, helping organizations improve network visibility, security, and control. It supports AI-driven analytics and automated workflows to enhance operational efficiency and reduce errors. Challenges include compatibility with third-party systems, steep learning curve, and complex deployment. Its interface facilitates centralized control, vital for troubleshooting, policy management, and configuration management, with support for zero-touch provisioning and SD-Access.

What are the key features of Cisco DNA Center?

Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights into network health with AI-driven analytics.
Centralized Security: Integrates with ISE for comprehensive security management.
Automated Device Management: Simplifies device provisioning and configuration transfers.
Wi-Fi Analytics: Offers deep insights into wireless network performance.
Zero-Touch Provisioning: Streamlines new device deployments with minimal human intervention.
Scalable Segmentation: Efficiently segments network traffic ensuring security and performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces potential errors and streamlines workflow.
Enhanced Security: Integration with Cisco ISE bolsters security capabilities.
Network Visibility: Comprehensive dashboards and analysis tools enhance monitoring.
Troubleshooting: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying and resolving issues swiftly.

In sectors such as healthcare, finance, and retail, Cisco DNA Center is utilized for its ability to enhance security and compliance, manage large-scale networks, and provide detailed analytics for better operational decision-making. Its support for location tracking and policy automation ensures efficient network management across diverse environments.

Cisco

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco DNA Center vs. DX NetOps report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.