No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CircleCI vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
CircleCI enhances efficiency by reducing development times and costs, automating tasks, and providing financial flexibility with its payment model.
Sentiment score
6.0
Automation enhances efficiency, cuts labor costs by 50%, boosts ROI, and saves time on reporting, content, and CRM tasks.
I have seen a return on investment with CircleCI, as it saves money and time, requires fewer employees because it automates deployments easily, and enables us to complete all development tasks in much less time with limited employees.
Solution Architect at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
It also has a credit system, so you pay for what you use, making it way cheaper than having a dedicated server running 24/7.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Before we were using CircleCI, deploying and setting up architecture or deploying an application for our customers took one or two days, but using CircleCI, it only takes around half a day, so it has improved significantly.
Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
Network Engineer at AT&T
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
Founder at WebEase
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
CircleCI's support is responsive and knowledgeable, with effective communication, though response times may vary in complex cases.
Sentiment score
5.5
Make's responsive customer support and abundant self-help resources efficiently resolve user issues, fostering an active, supportive community.
CircleCI provides detailed documentation, which often allowed us to troubleshoot and resolve problems independently.
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
I would rate the customer support a ten out of ten, as they take money but provide the best customer support.
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
Whenever we have had issues with initial setup or questions, both the customer support and technical support teams have been excellent.
Lead Engineer Senior Forntend Developer at Adobe
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
Freelancer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CircleCI efficiently scales projects, managing workloads and environments, with strong integration and automation for growing teams.
Sentiment score
5.5
Make is scalable and effective for complex workflows, but pricing and workflow setup can challenge some users.
Everything works together, and it is very scalable and performs well.
Devops Engineer at EDAG
It is highly scalable, as it is not on our system, so we do not need to take care of the runners as well.
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
In the cloud version, CircleCI allows you to go from running one job to 1,000 jobs instantly, so it is very robust.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It can handle increasing workloads or more complex automations easily, but I need to set up each and every component carefully.
Developer at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Founder at WebEase
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CircleCI provides stable, reliable CI/CD operations with high uptime, minimal disruptions, and is trusted for critical workflows.
Sentiment score
7.3
Make is mostly stable and reliable for users, with occasional minor bugs and issues that don't hinder overall performance.
It is most important for CircleCI to be stable and reliable because we run a production environment on it.
Devops Engineer at EDAG
We are using this software as a service solution, and if it goes down, the whole engineering stops working almost—we cannot push anything, and building does not work at all.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Overall, CircleCI has been stable and reliable for our needs at Ericsson in different telecom projects.
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
 

Room For Improvement

CircleCI faces challenges with pricing, complexity, and support, needing better UI, AI, integrations, documentation, and troubleshooting.
Users seek enhanced developer-friendliness, integrations, documentation, pricing, ease of use, security, stability, support tools, and customization.
I think there is also UI clutter; with very complex pipelines running with hundreds of steps, it becomes difficult to navigate in the web interface.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
If CircleCI implemented a function approach similar to GitHub Actions, it would be significantly better.
SRE coordinator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
CircleCI should leverage the growing trend of AI by offering an out-of-the-box AI-driven dynamic YAML file creation feature using natural language processing.
Managing Technical Consultant - Solution Architect at NTT DATA
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
Gtm Operator, Lead Generator at 404Minds Technologies
 

Setup Cost

CircleCI's enterprise pricing is variable and manageable, but transparency issues and high charges can occur without monitoring.
Make's pricing is affordable and flexible, with options like Docker solutions, making it cost-effective compared to competitors.
A large server costs more credits per minute than a small one, but there is a risk that some scripts or an infinite loop can burn through $500 of credit in a weekend if you do not set up spending limits or alerts.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
So far, we have been able to keep everything within our organization's budget.
VP at Tech 3 60
The pricing varies depending on how we use the pipelines, which run frequently, leading to variability in costs.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
Licensing was affordable.
Network Engineer at AT&T
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
 

Valuable Features

CircleCI offers YAML configuration, GitHub/GitLab integrations, Docker support, fast execution, and seamless DevOps integration for efficient CI/CD processes.
Make's intuitive interface and integrations boost efficiency and productivity, saving time and reducing manual tasks with seamless automation.
The GitHub integration is most valuable because of its ease of use, as it only requires integration with the GitHub repository and then creating the pipeline as a YAML file within the repository code.
SRE coordinator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Among those features, I find the most valuable in my day-to-day work the automation aspect, as we have a large product team with many developers who continuously create branches and push code, necessitating automation that builds the pipeline and the branches automatically while giving faster feedback.
Managing Technical Consultant - Solution Architect at NTT DATA
Running parallel jobs where dev gets automatically updated every time has helped our team significantly.
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Network Engineer at AT&T
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
Executive at Core Jobs
 

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI
Ranking in AI Software Development
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (6th)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.5%
CircleCI0.5%
Other99.0%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Automated pipelines have accelerated microservice delivery and improve release consistency
Debugging is an important point for improvement because when pipelines fail, debugging can sometimes be difficult, especially for the complex workflows which we have already faced in our organization in different projects. Logs are available, but root cause analysis can take time, so that can be improved. Also, configuration management challenges exist. Although YAML configuration is flexible, it can become complex and hard to maintain as pipelines grow in size and include multiple workflow conditions. The limited visibility for large pipelines is also a concern. For very large enterprise pipelines, the UI can feel less intuitive in terms of tracking dependencies and understanding the full workflow at a glance. Cost optimization is one important point for improvement. In cloud-based usage, costs can increase due to long-running jobs and inefficient pipelines. Proper optimization through caching and parallelism is required, otherwise it can become expensive, which we faced in one of our telecom projects last year. One thing CircleCI can improve is related to cloud runners, where any network or platform issues can impact pipeline execution. This can be a concern for critical telecom deployments.
Dinesh Lavu - PeerSpot reviewer
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects
Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CircleCI?
Debugging is an important point for improvement because when pipelines fail, debugging can sometimes be difficult, especially for the complex workflows which we have already faced in our organizati...
What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?
I would advise organizations or individual developers who are trying to use CircleCI to begin with basic pipelines and gradually move to advanced workflows such as deployment automation, parallel j...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about CircleCI vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.