Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Invicti comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 31 Invicti reviews

8,384 Views
1,844 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis and Invicti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Invicti Report (Updated: September 2026).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Invicti

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Invicti

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Container Security (32nd), API Security (12th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis	2.4%
Invicti	1.9%
Other	95.7%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Tharindu Malwenna

Senior Application Security Engineer at a newspaper with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient library identification and upgrade suggestions improve application security

We have many third-party libraries in our organization. I used Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis to identify all the libraries we use and determine whether they are used or unused within the application Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis provides identification of libraries and…

Read full review

PrashantUppuluri

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection

A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service and support were good."

"It has improved identification capabilities, scalability, and integration with AI, such as the AI-powered suggestions."

"We were able to reduce the number of vulnerable libraries by 50%, leading to significant operational improvement."

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The product is stable and scalable."

"Checkmarx unifies all the features in its service."

"It is very easy and user friendly. It never requires any kind of technical support. You can do everything on your own."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"NetSparker is a very easy to use and understand product."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis."

"Parts of the implementation process could improve by making it more user-friendly."

"It can have better licensing models."

"I have received complaints from my customers that the pricing could be improved."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced."

"Some of the recommendations provided by the product are generic. Even if the recommendations provided by the product are of low level, the appropriate ones can help users deal with vulnerabilities."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

"In terms of time and quality of support, Checkmarx SCA needs improvement."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted."

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"Perhaps the custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Pricing is complex and high for small organizations but offers great benefits for larger organizations. It is notably different compared to competitors like GitHub Advanced Security.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The solution could improve by determining the success factor of an upgrade, which is currently lacking.

What is your primary use case for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

Black Duck SCA vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 14% of the time

CAST SBOM Manager vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 10% of the time

Kodem's Dynamic SCA vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

October 2026

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Download Invicti product report

October 2026

Also Known As

CxSCA

Netsparker

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers robust features for identifying vulnerabilities in open source components. It integrates seamlessly into development processes, ensuring security from the start with its user-friendly interface and AI-enhanced suggestions. Ideal for .NET and Java applications.

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is an essential tool for developers looking to manage and secure open-source components. Known for its ease of integration and user-friendly design, it excels in providing comprehensive security by detecting vulnerabilities and offering actionable solutions. Developers gain from its configurability and visibility into library vulnerabilities. It further supports development with version upgrade suggestions and detailed insights, ensuring secure open-source component integration. Enhancing its effectiveness, AI-powered suggestions minimize false positives and improve scalability. While optimization of speed, performance, and pricing are anticipated, its strong integration capabilities within CI/CD pipelines make it a preferred choice for secure software development.

What are the key features of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and enhances usability for developers.
Incremental Scan Capability: Allows efficient continuous security assessments.
Vulnerability Detection: Provides detailed insights and solutions for identified issues.
AI-powered Suggestions: Minimizes false positives and enhances efficiency.
License Management: Assists in handling and managing license issues effectively.

What benefits can users expect from Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Enhanced Security: Maintains robust protection against vulnerabilities in open source components.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Visibility and Insight: Offers detailed insights into potential risks within libraries.
Scalability: Supports large-scale integration without compromising on performance.

In industries like banking and insurance, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis proves instrumental. Utilizing static code analysis, it assists these sectors by identifying security weaknesses in software. Its integration capability with CI/CD pipelines ensures that applications adhere to strict industry compliance and security standards.

Checkmarx

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank