Checkmarx One vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services comparison

Checkmarx and F5 are both solutions in the API Security category. Checkmarx is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while F5 is ranked #8 with an average rating of 10.0. Checkmarx holds a 6.4% mindshare in APIS, compared to F5’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 71 Checkmarx One reviews

229 Views
35 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Read 2 F5 Distributed Cloud Services reviews

296 Views
215 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Checkmarx One and F5 Distributed Cloud Services compete in cybersecurity, focusing on application security and cloud solutions. Checkmarx One has an edge in pricing and support, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services is favored for its comprehensive features that justify the cost.

Features: Checkmarx One features robust security testing capabilities to ensure application protection and integrates with development environments for seamless workflow. F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers scalable and flexible cloud-based solutions with advanced traffic management, security features, and expansive infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One enables straightforward deployment with minimal configuration and is recognized for its responsive support. F5 Distributed Cloud Services, with expansive service options, may require more involved setup but includes extensive documentation and technical guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides competitive pricing with strong returns on investment through efficient security integrations. F5 Distributed Cloud Services involves higher setup costs but provides significant long-term value through comprehensive cloud solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in API Security

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (24th), Static Code Analysis (3rd), DevSecOps (4th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th)

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Ranking in API Security

8th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (10th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (19th), AWS Marketplace (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 6.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 Distributed Cloud Services is 4.1%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Filip Mikulik

IT Analyst at Atlas.cz, a.s.

Protects web applications with comprehensive security features

All features are valuable. In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation. This is a comprehensive package for web application security. The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have seen a return on investment from Checkmarx One."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation."

"In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation."

"F5 is known for being the best load balancer in the market. Customers with an existing module can easily adopt additional modules without investing in new hardware."

Cons

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."

"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF."

"The pricing could be adjusted to better meet the needs of typical customers in regions like Poland, where the product is considered too expensive."

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the perspective of implementation and customer expectations, which sometimes differ from reality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"The solution is costly."

"It's relatively expensive."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

I am not involved in sales, so I do not deal with the pricing aspect directly. I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten since it is not a cheap product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

It's a long way to be perfect, of course, as with all solutions. The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the pers...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

There are two main use cases for Distributed Call Services: DDoS or Distributed attacks protection and WAF web application security or firewall.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 36% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

F5 Silverline Managed Services vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 21% of the time

Akamai vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 17% of the time

Akamai API Security vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 16% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 11% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 9% of the time

More F5 Distributed Cloud Services Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

June 2025

Download F5 Distributed Cloud Services product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

F5 Distributed Cloud Services excel in enhancing security, optimizing web application delivery, and ensuring robust network performance. Users value its integrated Web Application Firewall, DDoS protection, global server load balancing, and intuitive management interface. It boosts organizational efficiency, reduces operational costs, and scales seamlessly, making it essential for businesses operating in distributed environments.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

June 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services report.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.