Checkmarx One vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services comparison

Checkmarx and F5 are both solutions in the API Security category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while F5 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0. Checkmarx holds a 6.4% mindshare in APIS, compared to F5’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

254 Views
203 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Read 2 F5 Distributed Cloud Services reviews

249 Views
213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Checkmarx One and F5 Distributed Cloud Services compete in cybersecurity, focusing on application security and cloud solutions. Checkmarx One has an edge in pricing and support, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services is favored for its comprehensive features that justify the cost.

Features: Checkmarx One features robust security testing capabilities to ensure application protection and integrates with development environments for seamless workflow. F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers scalable and flexible cloud-based solutions with advanced traffic management, security features, and expansive infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One enables straightforward deployment with minimal configuration and is recognized for its responsive support. F5 Distributed Cloud Services, with expansive service options, may require more involved setup but includes extensive documentation and technical guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides competitive pricing with strong returns on investment through efficient security integrations. F5 Distributed Cloud Services involves higher setup costs but provides significant long-term value through comprehensive cloud solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in API Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Ranking in API Security

7th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (11th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (20th), AWS Marketplace (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 6.4%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 Distributed Cloud Services is 3.3%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Filip Mikulik

IT Analyst at Atlas.cz, a.s.

Protects web applications with comprehensive security features

All features are valuable. In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation. This is a comprehensive package for web application security. The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"The tool's valuable features include integrating GPT and Copilot. Additionally, the UI web representation is very user-friendly, making navigation easy. GPT has made several improvements to my security code."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

More Checkmarx One pros

"F5 is known for being the best load balancer in the market. Customers with an existing module can easily adopt additional modules without investing in new hardware."

"In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation."

"The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation."

Cons

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."

"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."

"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."

"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The pricing could be adjusted to better meet the needs of typical customers in regions like Poland, where the product is considered too expensive."

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the perspective of implementation and customer expectations, which sometimes differ from reality."

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"The solution is costly."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

I am not involved in sales, so I do not deal with the pricing aspect directly. I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten since it is not a cheap product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

It's a long way to be perfect, of course, as with all solutions. The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the pers...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

There are two main use cases for Distributed Call Services: DDoS or Distributed attacks protection and WAF web application security or firewall.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 40% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

F5 Silverline Managed Services vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 27% of the time

Akamai vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 16% of the time

Akamai API Security vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 14% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Front Door vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 10% of the time

More F5 Distributed Cloud Services Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

April 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

April 2025

Download F5 Distributed Cloud Services product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

F5 Distributed Cloud Services excel in enhancing security, optimizing web application delivery, and ensuring robust network performance. Users value its integrated Web Application Firewall, DDoS protection, global server load balancing, and intuitive management interface. It boosts organizational efficiency, reduces operational costs, and scales seamlessly, making it essential for businesses operating in distributed environments.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Services report.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.