Check Point Web Gateway vs NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Citrix are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Citrix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Web Gateway and NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

KlavsThaarup

Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense

Has improved threat visibility and centralized management but needs wider feature support

We have not worked much with granular control over web usage policies, so I cannot provide detailed feedback. We have not worked with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in threat prevention. Their product coverage is not as extensive as some competitors. They have fewer products and features compared to competitors. Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.

Read full review

it_user1330167

Manager at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Enables our users to have access to our custom-built applications but it should be easier to manage

We haven't had any problems with scalability for the use cases we've got. There are around twenty users of this solution in my company. We don't have plans to increase usage. Now that everybody is working from home, everyone has their own laptop so coming through remotely is easy. All we have to do it set up the remote environment which is why we set up terminal servers. Everyone seems to work pretty well. We also use a terminal server which is less easy to manage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

"We chose iboss for both zero trust and proxy (SWG) because their SWG was superior."

"The iboss solution gives me the ability to scan the traffic through all the ports, through all the 131,000 PCP and UDP ports, and with this ability, we have the granularity also for consults over social media and applications on mobile, and this is an advantage that the customers are looking for right now."

"Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

"We were impressed by the solution's mental health function, which can detect if someone needs help. It scans what users are browsing and flags warning signs so we can check to see if they are okay. We've had to use it a couple of times."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

More iboss pros

"For security concerns, Check Point Web Security is the best solution with features such as URL filtering, application control, and antivirus."

"SmartConsole is intuitive."

"We have required technical support quite a few times, and it has been very forthcoming from Check Point."

"I think this solution is very helpful to our customers because its cloud-based security can be deployed quickly and maintained easily."

"You don't have to wander around the tool since it is very simple. You can grab and get a hold of the tool very quickly."

"The product covers all the security needs of roaming users."

"This product has improved our organization by serving as a connection point with our partners, providing top-notch security and giving us the confidence that we have a secure connection when dealing with our partners."

"It is very stable."

More Check Point Web Gateway pros

"As the solution is now, we are able to satisfy all of our requirements."

"It is absolutely stable."

"Our primary use case is for when our employees are working remotely, this gives them access to our custom-built application."

"From my point of view, this solution is stable and we haven't had any real issues."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is dual authentication, which is good from a security perspective."

"From my point of view, this solution is stable and we haven't had any real issues."

Cons

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability with in the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing. It is kind of there, but it's not perfect. Quite frequently, I receive links that lead me to pages with error messages."

"I have heard they are doing DDoS filtering, but I am not certain if they are implementing it correctly."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"Fold that in with the risk intelligence they're getting from all of the different subscriptions they are a part of. Now, these security companies subscribe to things like emerging threats, databases, etc. You can fold all this intelligence to decide what's happening on an endpoint. I would love to see them start moving into that space. That would compete directly with Microsoft. Maybe that's why they haven't. Having that ability native within the solution would be great. The other area in which I would love to see improvement is more detailed descriptions of why they block websites."

"The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices; it is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents, and that is where in 2025 we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform."

"The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability within the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

More iboss cons

"Check Point Web Gateway could improve the graphical user interface to make it more appealing."

"It is expensive. Its price should be better."

"There is room for improvement in support because the solution needs multiple regions to reach certain features and validations."

"It is not user-friendly."

"I would like to be able to see an integration with centralized management services."

"We would really benefit from some more visual features that can help view the impact of the security gateway in the organization."

"The solution should improve integration."

"What I don't appreciate about Check Point Web Gateway is that sometimes we encounter problems with them asking too many questions."

More Check Point Web Gateway cons

"It would be helpful if this solution would collect information about people who are connecting from external devices so that we can rate their user experience in using the virtual desktops."

"The pricing of this solution can really be improved."

"The price of this solution is a little bit high and can be improved."

"I would like to see more monitoring, and there could always be deeper information to find out where issues are."

"In terms of improvement, it should be easier to manage. We have a small team and don't have much expertise, we need things that are easy to manage."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven out of ten."

"It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription."

"The price is very high."

"The product is not cheap. It is expensive."

"Our customers pay a licensing fee annually or once in three or five years, per their requirements."

"This program is very, very expensive."

"The price is on the higher side, even when compared to Azure Firewall Premium."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is neither too expensive nor too cheap, so it comes at a good price point for my company."

"The pricing of this solution can really be improved."

"Our annual fees are approximately $80,000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

We used iBoss mainly for Internet Access by having an Agent on Windows laptops Primarily because when we try to use i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

I am not involved in pricing, but as per the information I have, during that time, the Blue Coat proxies we were usin...

See all answers

What do you like most about Check Point Web Gateway?

You don't have to wander around the tool since it is very simple. You can grab and get a hold of the tool very quickly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Web Gateway?

It will be the same pricing as other solutions. Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Web Gateway?

As of now, I did not notice any significant areas for improvement. The interface of Check Point Web Gateway is far be...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Web Security Appliance vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 7% of the time

More Check Point Web Gateway Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

May 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Web Gateway

May 2026

Download Check Point Web Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

May 2026

NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] report

Download NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Check Point Web Gateway is designed for network security with a focus on protecting against threats like malware and phishing. It offers cloud deployment, URL filtering, malware protection, and real-time threat intelligence.

Check Point Web Gateway ensures stable performance through a cloud-based infrastructure and offers a range of capabilities such as URL filtering, application control, and malware protection. It supports granular policies and real-time threat intelligence, playing a crucial role in enhancing web traffic filtering and compliance enforcement. The gateway provides intuitive security management features, including antivirus, DLP, encryption detection, and behavioral analysis. While it supports role-based access control and prevents access to malicious websites, there is room for improvement in response times and documentation. Users find challenges in interface appeal, deployment complexities, and authentication policy management. Cost and scalability concerns exist, with a need for enhanced mobile integration and endpoint accessibility.

What are the key features of Check Point Web Gateway?

User-friendly interface: Offers intuitive navigation and configuration.
Stable performance: Reliable operation with robust infrastructure.
Cloud deployment: Facilitates easy access and management.
URL filtering: Blocks unauthorized or harmful websites.
Application control: Manages and restricts application access.
Malware protection: Detects and prevents malicious software.
Intrusion prevention system (IPS): Alerts and defends against online threats.

What benefits can users find in reviews?

Granular policies: Tailored security measures for diverse needs.
Efficient monitoring: Real-time visibility into network activity.
Real-time threat intelligence: Updated protection against new threats.
Data loss prevention (DLP): Safeguards against unauthorized data exposure.
Role-based access control: Ensures appropriate user permissions and security.

In industries such as banking and e-commerce, Check Point Web Gateway is used widely for securing network infrastructures against data breaches and ensuring compliance. Its multi-layer architecture supports seamless integration with site-to-site VPNs and user access management, enhancing overall security.

Check Point Software Technologies

With SSL decryption, NetScaler Secure Web Gateway helps you cost-effectively eliminate blind spots in your environment and strengthen your security posture.

Citrix

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify, Tradair, Laterlite, Phoenix International, Unisinos, Wilkin Chapman, Connexus Energy, Mutua Universal, Smart & Final, Central New Mexico Community Colleg, Grupo Financiero Multiva

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.