Check Point Web Gateway and Forcepoint ONE are solutions in the web protection category. Forcepoint ONE often has the upper hand due to its advanced cloud security features, although Check Point is preferred for its competitive pricing and customer support.
Features: Check Point Web Gateway provides URL filtering, application control, and antivirus capabilities. It also offers integrated threat intelligence and comprehensive IPS features. Forcepoint ONE features advanced cloud security, data loss prevention, and zero trust network access. It excels in threat detection and web isolation technologies.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Web Gateway could enhance its cloud security features and responsiveness in customer service. It might also benefit from simpler deployment options. Forcepoint ONE could improve by offering more competitive pricing, better integration with existing networks, and comprehensive on-premise components for diverse setups.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint ONE provides a cloud-centric deployment model, simplifying integration with minimal changes. Its customer service is noted for its responsiveness. Check Point Web Gateway's deployment can be more complex due to on-premise setups, but its service is praised for thorough issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point Web Gateway is known for its competitive pricing and a strong ROI, with bundled features that enhance its value. Forcepoint ONE, while potentially incurring higher upfront costs, offers long-term benefits such as data protection and scalability which users find valuable, positioning it as a significant investment.
I have fewer employees because Forcepoint ONE does the work that I used to rely on a team of engineers to previously detect.
Since I'm on the technical side, I don't handle ROI or financial metrics directly, but based on client feedback, many have seen improvements in operational efficiency mainly through centralized policy management and reduced manual investigation time, resulting in time savings and better visibility across their environments.
It is very difficult to measure the return on investment, but the control for the data is very important for companies because without an application similar to Forcepoint ONE, there is no control.
Our organization has private engineers who are certified by Check Point.
Having a local principal support available also helps speed up communication and coordination, especially for urgent or region-specific cases.
An engineer comes to resolve the issue.
They are responsive and assist me with creating cases for any complex issues.
The cloud solution can be scalable, but in most cases, it is not because it is bound to specific firewalls.
It can easily scale to support thousands of users and devices without requiring major infrastructure changes.
Forcepoint ONE runs smoothly, and scaling is easy.
Forcepoint ONE is very scalable because it is located in the cloud, and I don't have to manage the machines or anything with the infrastructure.
Forcepoint ONE is very stable.
There have been some specific outcomes since switching to Forcepoint ONE.
I think Forcepoint ONE is pretty stable, as the connection and agent synchronization are reliable, but it can still be improved.
Deployment issues on Linux have been noted, especially with agents on endpoints.
Check Point asks for the registered mail ID and number, which sometimes you can't quickly provide when under pressure because your client's network is down.
Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
I need to control specific functionalities within certain applications, like preventing the transfer of certain file types.
Having more flexible reporting and alert customization to tailor insights for different clients and compliance needs would be beneficial.
There is room for improvement in making the reporting closer to real-time, ideally around five or ten minutes instead of half an hour.
The pricing and discounts for Check Point Web Gateway are similar to Fortinet, making it cost-effective with fair pricing.
Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
The pricing is very good and cheaper than other solutions like Netskope and Forcepoint.
the pricing is better than all
The licensing and pricing were fine with no issues.
It provides behavioral analysis and a Copilot feature implemented in the management console, allowing users to receive assistance in an automated format.
We are satisfied with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in Check Point Web Gateway.
We are using the real-time threat intelligence feature. It helps to manage web threats effectively with qualified alarms.
The most valuable feature was the website blocking capability, which allowed me to quickly block any dodgy websites.
It shortens response time for our clients, allowing their security team to view incidents in real-time, classify them easily, and focus on genuine risks instead of sorting through false positives, and it simplifies reporting and audit preparation since all the relevant data is consolidated in one place.
Forcepoint ONE made a difference, particularly regarding cost reduction because all the features that Forcepoint ONE bundles are in one package.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint ONE | 1.7% |
| Check Point Web Gateway | 1.4% |
| Other | 96.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Check Point Web Gateway is designed for network security with a focus on protecting against threats like malware and phishing. It offers cloud deployment, URL filtering, malware protection, and real-time threat intelligence.
Check Point Web Gateway ensures stable performance through a cloud-based infrastructure and offers a range of capabilities such as URL filtering, application control, and malware protection. It supports granular policies and real-time threat intelligence, playing a crucial role in enhancing web traffic filtering and compliance enforcement. The gateway provides intuitive security management features, including antivirus, DLP, encryption detection, and behavioral analysis. While it supports role-based access control and prevents access to malicious websites, there is room for improvement in response times and documentation. Users find challenges in interface appeal, deployment complexities, and authentication policy management. Cost and scalability concerns exist, with a need for enhanced mobile integration and endpoint accessibility.
What are the key features of Check Point Web Gateway?In industries such as banking and e-commerce, Check Point Web Gateway is used widely for securing network infrastructures against data breaches and ensuring compliance. Its multi-layer architecture supports seamless integration with site-to-site VPNs and user access management, enhancing overall security.
Forcepoint ONE offers a comprehensive solution for data protection and security compliance, focusing on cloud applications and role-based access control for safe interactions across platforms.
Forcepoint ONE effectively manages data access, ensuring security and compliance while reducing operational costs and offering a user-friendly interface for easy management. Integrating seamlessly with existing company devices, it provides enhanced Zero Trust Network Access, incident management, and identity verification. Cloud application protection, including Office 365, is maximized through strategic use of Secure Web Gateway (SWG) and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) models, which help guard against unauthorized access, manage secure logins, and filter URL content.
What are the key features of Forcepoint ONE?Organizations use Forcepoint ONE primarily for ensuring compliance and secure data management in environments like healthcare and corporate sectors. By safeguarding sensitive information like PHI and utilizing robust role-based access control, users can enhance security measures significantly. Additionally, the system's ability to manage secure exchanges and protect resources underlines its relevance in regulated industries.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
