

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Check Point WAF are two competitive products in the cybersecurity arena. Forcepoint holds the advantage in data control and compliance, while Check Point WAF excels in threat management with real-time capabilities.
Features: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention stands out with its robust data protection through advanced data discovery, classification tools, and multiple integrations, such as SIEM and OCR. Its unique fingerprinting and machine-learning classifications enhance security across various channels. Check Point WAF prioritizes threat prevention with AI-driven analysis for zero-day attacks, leveraging contextual machine learning and offering granular access controls.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention could improve its language support, false positive rates, and AI technology integrations. Simplifying user experience and enhancing real-time reporting would also be beneficial. Check Point WAF would gain from better API security, reduced latency, more intuitive policy management, and enhanced integration with DevOps workflows. Pricing and support are areas for improvement for both products, particularly for Check Point WAF.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is predominantly deployed on-premises, with mixed customer service reviews, often praised but occasionally criticized for slow responses and regional support limitations. Check Point WAF offers versatile deployment options, primarily cloud-based, with generally satisfactory support but with room for improvement in language support and service latency.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint's pricing is considered high, especially with certain licensing thresholds not favoring smaller organizations. Despite this, it is regarded as cost-effective due to its comprehensive feature set and positive ROI reports. Check Point WAF, similarly priced, is seen as cost-efficient but sometimes high without competitive discounts. Users of both products appreciate the perceived value but face specific pricing challenges.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
I have seen a return on investment, and the biggest one is saving time.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
They conduct sessions to check logs and policies, unlike Symantec, where engineers may temporarily check and ask for logs, causing delays.
I expect that ticket alignment within Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention support should depend on the type of case, and that is not there.
We were very happy with the technical support engineers that are supporting us.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
The key principle of a scalable DLP uses a single policy engine across multiple data channels such as endpoint, email, web, cloud, and network.
It is easily scalable because it is purely deployed on on-premises and with less downtime.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention performs well in terms of scalability, as it can handle growth because the license is a trust-based license, so it will not block the growth.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
The stability of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is reliable, with minimum crashes, errors, or performance issues.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
While Forcepoint is mostly on-premises, I suggest that to compete with Symantec, they should consider cloud solutions.
The AI component is missing in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, where based on user behavior analytics, it could give us suggestions.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is already capable enough to integrate with data classification tools such as Boldon James and Microsoft MIP.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
There have been situations where the license expired before the purchased license was sent, resulting in the DLP being out of service.
The pricing is reasonable and medium, not very low, but fair for the product offered.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is that the pricing was reasonable.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
It provides multiple customization options for policies, which makes it superior to Symantec.
It supports 50 file types and continuously improves accuracy with user feedback, enabling auto-discovery across cloud, endpoint, and on-premises data stores without extra cost of repeated scans.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention's email workflow checks whether emails sent from the office are forbidden by DLP rules and sends a notification to the manager accordingly.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention | 4.6% |
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 0.7% |
| Other | 94.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.
Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.
What are the main features of Check Point WAF?Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policies and centralized visibility to simplify compliance and prevent data breaches in real time.
With over 1,800 pre-defined templates, policies, and classifiers covering the regulatory requirements of 90+ countries and 160+ regions, Forcepoint DLP accelerates deployment and ensures precise protection of regulated and sensitive data.
Flexible deployment options let organizations protect data on-premises, in the cloud, or through a hybrid approach using the same unified console. Powered by AI-driven classification and Risk-Adaptive Protection (RAP), Forcepoint DLP reduces complexity, automates compliance, and safeguards data wherever work happens.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is equipped with advanced fingerprinting technology, optical character recognition, and a large library of predefined rules. Organizations gain comprehensive data visibility and effective policy enforcement, supported by dynamic user behavior analysis and compliance capabilities. Its intuitive interface and flexible deployment options position it as a top choice for data security, although it could improve in communication reliability and language support. Complex reporting, machine learning integration, and cross-platform compatibility require enhancements.
What are the key features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?
What benefits and ROI can users expect from reviews?
In industries like finance, legal, and healthcare, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is implemented to protect sensitive data such as credit card information and personal identification. It monitors and controls data on networks, endpoints, and cloud services, detecting unauthorized transfers through features like OCR and fingerprinting.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.