

Check Point Security Management and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform are both leading in the cyber security space, focusing on different aspects of enterprise security management. Check Point is more robust in feature offerings like identity and threat prevention, while ThreatLocker stands out with its zero trust and application control capabilities.
Features: Check Point Security Management offers extensive features such as identity awareness, centralized log management, and performance enhancements through ClusterXL. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is notable for its granular application control, allowlisting, and additional security measures like Ring-Fencing and Elevation Control.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Security Management could improve in policy management and dashboard customization for large-scale operations. ThreatLocker could benefit from enhanced identity management, better SIEM integration, and streamlined learning modes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point is typically deployed on-premises with generally strong support but varies regionally. ThreatLocker provides deployment across cloud and hybrid environments with supportive onboarding and competitive pricing, generally praised for its transparency in support.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point Security Management justifies its higher cost with significant ROI through comprehensive security solutions, while ThreatLocker offers a cost-effective approach with competitive pricing, providing substantial ROI by consolidating multiple security tools.
I have seen a strong ROI from using Check Point Security Management through unified policy management, reduced misconfigurations, and faster incident response.
The time to resolve issues is very much better now with Check Point Security Management.
I have seen a hundred percent return on investment with Check Point Security Management.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
When we face technical issues, they are ready to help us.
They are very helpful in each and every technical aspect and able to resolve complex issues within the timeline.
Customer support for Check Point Security Management is excellent
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
It can be a multi-domain Security Management server and can manage large or segmented environments with multiple domains or customers.
When you upgrade multiple times, you leave many files that are useless. They are dated, so it's always better to create a new machine every few versions, for example, three or four major versions.
The scalability of Check Point Security Management is excellent.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
Check Point Security Management is really stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or issues with reliability except for when we do upgrades.
The SmartConsole used to administrate the security management is somewhat unstable.
Check Point Security Management is stable and I have not experienced any downtime or reliability issues.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
When the logs are too heavy for the security management server, the CPU spike will be high, causing our management day-to-day activity to lag or become difficult.
Refining reports and automation capabilities to make it more intuitive and scalable for diverse enterprise environments could improve Check Point Security Management.
Engaging role-based access control is essential; granular permissions for more flexible RBAC will allow the organization to delegate tasks.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
Licensing is quite expensive.
We pay on a three-year base.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by providing centralized control, allowing us to manage all security policies and gateways from a single console, reducing complexity and saving time.
After deploying Check Point Security Management, we improved our productivity by integrating all devices into a single console instead of managing separate log-ins for each branch's gateways, making our admin team's tasks easier.
The monitoring is exceptional as it provides consolidated logs, signals, and any alerts that come from the security gateway in real time.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 2.6% |
| Check Point Security Management | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Check Point Security Management is an advanced security management platform for enterprises. The platform integrates all aspects of security. A single platform manages the entire infrastructure, from data centers to private/public cloud deployments.
Check Point Security Management is a reliable and easy-to-use security platform. It integrates all aspects of your security environment to strengthen the security posture without impairing productivity. The system has a layered policy model. This means the security policy can be separated into layers for network segmentation. Different administrators can manage different policies. The policy layer automates the tasks.
The platform is extensible, scalable, and integrates easily with orchestration systems and change management.
Basic Components of the Infrastructure
The smart console offers several advantages. Changes in security policies and logs can be done with a click. You can navigate from an item within a log to the policy. There are also built-in multi-language support and accessibility features.
1. Security Management Server: The server manages security gateways with set security policies and monitors security events on the network.
The automation server is an integrated part of the management server. The API server is active by default on servers with 4 GB of RAM or more and on standalone servers with 8 or more GB of RAM.
The automation server communicates with the management server the same way as the Smart Console. This architecture allows the same validation errors and warnings to be presented when using an automation session.
The same audit logs generated using the Smart Console are also generated using an automation session. If you have a multi-domain environment, there is only one automation server that monitors all the IP addresses of the multi-domain management server.
2. Security Gateway is placed at the edge of the network. It monitors and filters traffic and enforces security policies.
Logging, Event management, and Monitoring
With Check Point Security Management, logging, reporting, event management, and monitoring are integrated. The platform features widgets and chart templates that optimize visibility. One of the best features is the one-click exploration. This simplifies going from a general overview to specific event details.
Benefits of Check Point Security Management
The unified console also means a single policy for users, data, applications, and networks. The granularity control helps accelerate administration processes. This feature, together with automation, is key to achieving reduced operational overhead. Security teams can automate tasks and even create self-service security web portals with the Check Point Security Management platform.
Threat management is fully integrated, with reporting, logging, and monitoring all in one dashboard. This provides full visibility into the security of the network.
Security Management Suite
The Security Management Suite consists of the following modules:
Reviews from Real Users
A Network Security Engineer/Architect at a tech services company says, "The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."
"The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering," says a System Engineer Network & Security at OTTO GmbH & Co KG.
A Senior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited adds that "The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."
Gain proactive, industry leading Zero Trust cybersecurity capabilities with ThreatLocker. By employing a deny-by-default approach, you will greatly enhance your security and operational efficiency. Solutions from ThreatLocker are focused on precise application control and
streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Application Control solutions include Zero Trust Alllowlisting, Zero Trust Ringfencing and Privilege Access Management, significantly reducing any unauthorized software activities in your environment. Granular controls improve your overall security, while ringfencing enhances application behavior monitoring. Elevation requests will allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and
unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker to ensure endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high
security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.