No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo

Top 10 Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Advanced Threat Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, and Proofpoint Email Protection. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection excels in detailed incident management, broad threat protection, and SIEM integration but is costly and has a complex deployment process. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers Windows integration, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment but can be resource-intensive.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a significant setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable and straightforward onboarding process, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for Microsoft's solution.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a significant setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more affordable and straightforward onboarding process, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for Microsoft's solution.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection excels in endpoint and network security with strong integration options. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 emphasizes superior integration within its ecosystem, benefiting companies invested in Office products. Symantec offers fair pricing; Microsoft provides significant ROI through its comprehensive suite.
Download Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365, which offers a broader range of setup features at a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365, which offers a broader range of setup features at a higher price point.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection
4.2 out of 5

Proofpoint Email Protection provides advanced security against phishing, spam, and malware with features like anti-malware, encryption, and data loss prevention. Many integrate it with Office 365. Comprehensive sandboxes, TAP and TRAP, enhance threat protection, yet users seek improved integration, enhanced phishing defenses, and more flexible reporting. Pricing and technical setup complexities are common concerns.

Download Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost.
The price is reasonable.
View comparison
Pricing
Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost.
The price is reasonable.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET excels in resource efficiency, centralized device management, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Symantec offers advanced threat protection, extensive integration, and endpoint-to-network security, making it suitable for organizations needing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Symantec Advanced Threat Protection features more comprehensive security measures, though at a higher initial expense. Noticeable differences in initial costs and setup complexity highlight ...
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, whereas Symantec Advanced Threat Protection features more comprehensive security measures, though at a higher initial expense. Noticeable differences in initial costs and setup complexity highlight ...
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks WildFire excels with comprehensive malware detection and seamless integration within its ecosystem, ideal for robust network security. In comparison, Symantec ATP offers advanced threat analytics and competitive pricing, appealing to those prioritizing flexible cost management and SIEM integration.
Download Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Palo Alto Networks WildFire offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting its complex deployment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks WildFire offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting its complex deployment requirements.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
4.3 out of 5
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline excels in network visibility and is easier to deploy with supportive customer service and competitive pricing. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers powerful threat detection with AI analytics and long-term value despite being more challenging to implement.
Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline incurs higher initial setup costs, contrasting with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's more affordable setup. This difference highlights a significant financial consideration when choosing between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline incurs higher initial setup costs, contrasting with Symantec Advanced Threat Protection's more affordable setup. This difference highlights a significant financial consideration when choosing between these two solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers strong threat identification and extensive forensic capabilities. In comparison, Anomali excels in integrating with intelligence platforms for enhanced analytics. Symantec's ease of deployment appeals to specific users, while Anomali provides superior long-term ROI through advanced features.
Download Anomali vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity
4.4 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust integration and threat analysis with comprehensive alert features. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity excels in identity security using AI and strong Microsoft integration, making Symantec attractive for flexibility and Defender for streamlined Microsoft environments in enhancing security strategies.
Download Microsoft Defender for Identity vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity. Microsoft Defender, while costing more, offers an integrated approach, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity. Microsoft Defender, while costing more, offers an integrated approach, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust email security and seamless integration capabilities, making it ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series provides advanced application filtering and centralized control, appealing to those prioritizing dynamic scaling and comprehensive firewall management.
Download Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection requires significant initial setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers more competitive pricing. Symantec users often mention complex installation, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a simpler integration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection requires significant initial setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers more competitive pricing. Symantec users often mention complex installation, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a simpler integration process.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai
4.4 out of 5
NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai is used for penetration testing. It integrates with vulnerability management, offering automated testing, GPU-powered tasks, cloud deployment, and actionable insights. Users benefit from streamlined processes like vulnerability prioritization, network scans, and fast synchronization, though demand exists for enhanced reporting, threat detection, and better naming conventions.
Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs. The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai Report
View comparison
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian excels in data protection and visibility for enhanced data control. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust threat detection with advanced threat hunting tools. While Digital Guardian is cost-effective, Symantec's comprehensive threat prevention features justify its higher price.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Digital Guardian offers cost-effective setup options, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its focus on comprehensive security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian offers cost-effective setup options, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its focus on comprehensive security measures.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall excels in scalability and security features with effective management tools beneficial for global operations. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection focuses on integration and detailed threat analysis, making it suitable for environments needing advanced threat intelligence and flexible licensing.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall setup costs are cited as relatively affordable, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is often considered more expensive. This reflects their different target markets and feature offerings, which may influence budget-focused decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall setup costs are cited as relatively affordable, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is often considered more expensive. This reflects their different target markets and feature offerings, which may influence budget-focused decisions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers comprehensive threat defense with real-time analysis and seamless integration, appealing to enterprises needing detailed incident management. In comparison, Morphisec applies a signatureless approach, emphasizing ease of integration and cost-efficiency, ideal for preventing zero-day threats with minimal performance impact.
Download Morphisec vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more complex setup process, whereas Morphisec provides a straightforward and cost-effective setup. This stark contrast highlights different setup procedures and cost implications for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more complex setup process, whereas Morphisec provides a straightforward and cost-effective setup. This stark contrast highlights different setup procedures and cost implications for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Check Point Infinity
4.4 out of 5
Symantec ATP excels in integration with Broadcom solutions, offering efficient incident management and leveraging data analysis for threat protection. In comparison, Check Point Infinity excels with its cloud integration and Zero Trust architecture, providing robust security across diverse environments.
Download Check Point Infinity vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection requires significant initial investment, while Check Point Infinity offers a more cost-effective startup option. Check Point Infinity provides a more budget-friendly setup than Symantec Advanced Threat Protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection requires significant initial investment, while Check Point Infinity offers a more cost-effective startup option. Check Point Infinity provides a more budget-friendly setup than Symantec Advanced Threat Protection.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Network Detection and Response excels with Yara rule editing and zero-day vulnerability handling. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection integrates well with SIEM products and offers affordable pricing. Trellix provides significant ROI in threat detection, while Symantec's affordability appeals to cost-conscious buyers.
Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. Symantec provides cost efficiency, but Trellix emphasizes advanced capabilities justifying the higher startup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Network Detection and Response incurs a higher setup cost, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers a more affordable initial investment. Symantec provides cost efficiency, but Trellix emphasizes advanced capabilities justifying the higher startup expense.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers customizable integration with FortiGate and excels in zero-day threat detection, appealing to those seeking scalability. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection provides robust email and network protection, making it suitable for comprehensive threat analysis and SIEM integration.
Download Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Fortinet FortiSandbox has lower setup costs compared to Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, which involves higher initial expenses. This difference highlights Fortinet's cost-efficiency advantage for businesses evaluating setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSandbox has lower setup costs compared to Symantec Advanced Threat Protection, which involves higher initial expenses. This difference highlights Fortinet's cost-efficiency advantage for businesses evaluating setup investment.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Check Point Security Management
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Security Management excels in centralized management and comprehensive policy creation, beneficial for reducing incidents. In comparison, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection delivers strong threat detection with endpoint protection and flexible licensing, appealing to organizations prioritizing versatile threat-oriented cybersecurity solutions.
Download Check Point Security Management vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Check Point Security Management setup costs are higher but offer robust management features, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection presents more cost-effective setup options, focusing on threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Security Management setup costs are higher but offer robust management features, while Symantec Advanced Threat Protection presents more cost-effective setup options, focusing on threat detection capabilities.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Veritas Alta SaaS Protection
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust integration and security features for comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection provides straightforward backup capabilities for Office 365 and hybrid environments. Tech buyers might choose Symantec for security or Veritas for ease of use in backups.
Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher setup cost compared to Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection is ideal for those needing comprehensive endpoint security and real-time analysis. In comparison, Check Point SandBlast Network excels in zero-day threat protection and sandboxing, making it attractive for organizations prioritizing advanced threat isolation and high detection rates.
Download Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point SandBlast Network offers a more cost-effective setup. This pricing difference may influence user preference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection appeals to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and broad integration across various platforms. In comparison, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense attracts with advanced features like sandboxing and adaptability, making it suitable for organizations needing sophisticated threat analysis and response capabilities.
Download Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection reviews highlight the substantial setup cost, while Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is noted for a relatively moderate setup cost, showcasing a clear distinction in initial financial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection reviews highlight the substantial setup cost, while Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is noted for a relatively moderate setup cost, showcasing a clear distinction in initial financial investment between the two solutions.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers robust threat intelligence and automated incident response, appealing to security-focused enterprises. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection delivers multi-engine sandboxing and cloud scalability, making it attractive for businesses seeking comprehensive security solutions with adaptable deployment and superior ROI potential.
Download SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection involves a significant setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection offers a more economical initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection involves a significant setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection offers a more economical initial setup.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer
4.5 out of 5
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection offers real-time threat intelligence and lower pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer provides advanced behavioral analysis and automation, attracting those seeking detailed threat identification, despite its higher cost and potentially complex initial setup.
Download Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Report
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has high setup costs, whereas Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is more affordable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection has high setup costs, whereas Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is more affordable, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Hillstone Cloud Sandbox
1 out of 5
Hillstone Cloud Sandbox enhances threat detection through advanced threat emulation and analysis. Users appreciate its robust security features and quick response capabilities. However, some reviews mention the need for improved integration with existing systems and more detailed reporting options.
View comparison

Related categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Anti-Malware Tools