Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Check Point Remote Access VPN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Check Point Harmony SASE users report fewer security incidents, cost savings, enhanced productivity, and reduced traditional VPN reliance.
Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point VPN enhances remote work, offering stability, security, and financial gains of 40% to over 100% for companies.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
In this case, everything is pre-inbuilt, allowing me to easily create new users and share their details so they can connect to Check Point VPN and access internal servers.
Since implementing Check Point Remote Access VPN, I have seen a return on investment as it saves me money and allows users to easily access internal resources from home.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Check Point Harmony SASE receives mixed to positive reviews for responsive support, though some users experienced delays in resolution.
Sentiment score
6.1
Customer service is generally praised, but technical support experiences mixed reviews with some delays and intermediary issues.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
After updating firmware, data utilization was visible for a few days before collapsing again.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The timing of technical support does not always align with our working hours.
While the support team is generally good, it takes at least three to four days to address ticket issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony SASE is scalable, cloud-based, and adaptable but faces some redundancy limitations compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Remote Access VPN is scalable for diverse deployments but may struggle with connection stability at higher capacities.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Currently, 130 users can connect simultaneously, and it is very reliable and efficient.
I feel confident that Check Point Remote Access VPN can scale effectively if our organization grows, as it can handle additional users and traffic.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable with 99.9% uptime, despite rare glitches, earning high user reliability ratings.
Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable with rare issues, improved reliability, and minor connectivity challenges during updates.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and has been reliable for my users.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony SASE could improve with SD-WAN, alerts, better UI, analytics, integration, support, and documentation enhancements.
Check Point VPN needs easier deployment, better compatibility, simplified interface, scalability improvements, and features like multi-factor authentication.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
Check Point Remote Access VPN could improve by automatically switching between my two ISPs when one goes down.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony SASE offers clear pricing and flexibility, ideal for large enterprises but costly for small businesses.
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers competitive pricing, cost-effective subscriptions, and comprehensive features, despite potentially high initial setup costs.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
It is a bit expensive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Remote Access VPN are a bit low compared to my previous solution.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony SASE enhances security with Zero Trust Access, Secure Gateway, and ThreatCloud intelligence, optimizing remote work management.
Check Point Remote Access VPN provides secure, easy connectivity with features like multi-factor authentication, encryption, and comprehensive threat prevention.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
The end-to-end endpoint security provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN impacts our organization by ensuring compliance and enhancing security.
The visibility offered by Check Point Remote Access VPN has benefited my organization as it detects unauthorized access attempts, immediately alerting me via a pop-up for any threat protection issues.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (15th), Anti-Malware Tools (6th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (6th)
Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.
Anant Suman - PeerSpot reviewer
Remote administration is enabled with secure and user-friendly access
The main purpose of the product is for firewall purposes that we are using, and the VPN provides secure access for remote connections. It adds simplicity, as the solution is simple enough, with an easy interface. The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
One area that could be improved is the complexity of setting up Check Point Remote Access VPN, particularly with features like multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and identity awareness. D...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We are resellers of Check Point products in our country, and our customers use Check Point Remote Access VPN to keep their organization data clean and safe when users access remotely through the cl...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Check Point Remote Access VPN and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.