Check Point Harmony Browse vs Fortinet FortiProxy comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Fortinet are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.9, while Fortinet is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.8% mindshare in WSG, compared to Fortinet’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Fortinet FortiProxy and Check Point Harmony Browse are competing in the web security space. Check Point Harmony Browse has an upper hand thanks to its comprehensive features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Fortinet FortiProxy is known for web filtering, VPN integration, and effective malware scanning, enhancing enterprise security. Check Point Harmony Browse offers advanced threat prevention through cloud intelligence, seamless infrastructure integration, and superior threat intelligence, integrating deeply into existing systems.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiProxy could enhance threat intelligence and integration capabilities for better competitive positioning. Its user interface might benefit from simplification for enhanced usability. Enhancements in cloud-based management would broaden adaptability. Check Point Harmony Browse could improve in areas such as reducing deployment complexity further for a smoother start. Cost management adjustments might make it more accessible to smaller organizations. Increased flexibility in adapting to diverse business environments could enhance its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiProxy offers straightforward deployment and reliable customer support to ensure ongoing service and maintenance. Check Point Harmony Browse provides intuitive deployment with robust support, featuring quick implementation and cloud-based management flexibility, allowing for more agile deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiProxy offers competitive initial costs, making it attractive for cost-conscious organizations while still achieving a good ROI. Check Point Harmony Browse, though costlier upfront, offers significant long-term value via advanced features and security benefits, resulting in a higher payoff over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of iboss is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony Browse is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiProxy is 2.6%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	3.3%
Fortinet FortiProxy	2.6%
Check Point Harmony Browse	0.8%
Other	93.3%

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

AndreiBo

Security Solution Architect at TD SYNNEX

Real-time threat intelligence enhances security and user confidence

At this point, I do not have any suggestions for improvements to Check Point Harmony Browse because I haven't encountered anything that would need changing. If a solution is installed correctly, it usually won't fail. It's hard to suggest new features for Check Point Harmony Browse because it's a sub-component of a larger Harmony Endpoint Security solution, which is handled separately under specific situations, and while it has many options, it already scans and delivers files efficiently. Regarding the scanning of large files in Check Point Harmony Browse, the process typically involves sending the file to Check Point cloud for scanning and returning the clean file to the user, which is inherently complex and I do not see how it could be optimized to be faster.

Read full review

Emmanuel Dasho

Cyber Security Engineer | Network/Security at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Ease of configuration and seamless integration enhance operational efficiency

The App Control feature in the Fortinet FortiProx * Deep Packet Inspection (DPI): FortiProxy analyzes traffic at the application layer to detect applications even if they use non-standard ports or are encrypted. * Application Signatures: Uses FortiGuard’s application signature database (constantly updated) to recognize thousands of applications. * Policy Enforcement: You can create policies to Allow, Block, Monitor, or Shape (QoS) based on application type, category, or specific apps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a corporate perspective, I understand that it's important to keep the company data safe."

"We were impressed by the solution's mental health function, which can detect if someone needs help. It scans what users are browsing and flags warning signs so we can check to see if they are okay. We've had to use it a couple of times."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"iboss is definitely very good in terms of service."

"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent."

"Because of iboss, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis."

"iboss is easy to use despite its complexity. Multiple engineers manage it, but it's significantly more straightforward to administer than traditional VPNs and web proxies."

"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."

More iboss pros

"Its Nano Agent, which integrates with the browser, is incredibly invisible to the user and the computer since it does not require much performance."

"It has content filtering, which has helped us a lot in being able to apply the necessary filtering policies where we can allow or block websites."

"The product enforces the privacy of the users, which is good."

"I recommend all to start using Check Point Harmony Browse as it's the best available security software in the market currently."

"It provides end-to-end encryption for the communication between the user's device and the remote browser, which helps to protect against eavesdropping and other forms of man-in-the-middle attacks."

"Check Point Harmony Browse helps with securing managed and unmanaged devices by functioning as a lightweight browser that validates the user on the basis of device posture when first authenticated, allowing access to secure internet applications or internal applications regardless of whether the device is corporate or a personal BYOD device."

"Among its most important features is the integration of its analytics."

"It analyzes and verifies in detail how secure or insecure a file, document, or object is that is being downloaded."

More Check Point Harmony Browse pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is traffic inspections."

"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiProxy are its simplicity and performance."

"I liked the tool's ability to provide detailed access control. For example, we could allow users to watch YouTube videos but not post comments. This level of control wasn't available in FortiGate."

"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiProxy are its simplicity and performance."

"It seamlessly integrates with various security products, enhancing threat intelligence and improving indicators of compromise."

"It helps to secure the networks at the DNA level and ensure proper identification and filtering of DNS traffic."

"We can use Fortinet FortiProxy configuration for your network."

"It is a really stable solution."

More Fortinet FortiProxy pros

Cons

"Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc. It is easy to gain access if, for example, hackers obtain my username and password."

"Its pricing could be better."

"The dashboards for local use could be better."

"One thing I would like to see differently with their Zero Trust platform is that some of the AI aspects related to high-risk activities have more false positives."

"It is stable, but due to growth, it can sometimes be less stable than wanted."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company ExxonMobil."

"Fold that in with the risk intelligence they're getting from all of the different subscriptions they are a part of. Now, these security companies subscribe to things like emerging threats, databases, etc. You can fold all this intelligence to decide what's happening on an endpoint. I would love to see them start moving into that space. That would compete directly with Microsoft. Maybe that's why they haven't. Having that ability native within the solution would be great. The other area in which I would love to see improvement is more detailed descriptions of why they block websites."

More iboss cons

"The initial policy setup can feel a bit complex, particularly when trying to customize controls for different user groups."

"It seems to us that the performance in some opportunities of Check Point Infinity and the administration web portal is slow."

"The pricing for Check Point Harmony Browse can be a bit pricey sometimes, depending on the project."

"While it is effective, the management portal could use some refinement. For instance, we would like to see more advanced filtering options and clearer reporting for policy violations."

"The URL filtering database should be improved."

"Check Point Harmony Browse can be improved by reducing false positive reports."

"Something that is worth mentioning is the need for support in Spanish and better representation for teams in the Latin American area, where there is a growing demand for these IT services and new technologies."

"One suggestion for improvement is if the Check Point Browse team can add more plugins to support more third-party browsers such as Opera and Safari."

More Check Point Harmony Browse cons

"Fortinet FortiProxy should improve by adding more documentation and guides."

"Its power supply process for some of the proxies needs improvement."

"Fortinet FortiProxy should improve by adding more documentation and guides."

"For IT administrators and managers, the reporting features are the main issues that should be addressed in order to improve the performance, security, and effective utilization of the product."

"Integration with existing infrastructure was generally easy, especially if you had tools like LDAP. However, I had to go through a lot of documentation as it was my first time working with a proxy server. We did experience some issues with certain web applications not working properly after implementing Fortinet FortiProxy."

"Fortinet FortiProxy should integrate AI/ML technologies. Its pricing needs to be more flexible."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its granular access control. For example, users can browse the main site if you allow access to Amazon, but it stops them from visiting secondary Amazon websites without specific permission. This granular control is really helpful."

"Its web filtering capabilities could be improved."

More Fortinet FortiProxy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The product has a reasonable pricing."

"The price is not very expensive for our organisation, but for others, it might be a little expensive."

"Price-wise, Fortinet FortiProxy is moderate - not the highest among competitors, but not cheap either."

"It can be considered expensive, with a limited lifespan and support that eventually requires updating to newer solutions."

"The tool's pricing is in the middle."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"It offers a more cost-effective solution than alternatives like FortiMail, FortiGate, and various Barracuda devices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Security Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

We used iBoss mainly for Internet Access by having an Agent on Windows laptops Primarily because when we try to use i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

I am not involved in pricing, but as per the information I have, during that time, the Blue Coat proxies we were usin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Browse?

The browsing speed of Check Point Harmony Browse can be improved. The user interface and compatibility are good, but ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Harmony Browse?

Check Point Harmony Browse serves as our primary browser. Since browsers are the first point of contact for any issue...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Browse?

The pricing and setup cost of Check Point Harmony Browse are affordable for my organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiProxy?

For me it may be the wildcards for urls whitelist or blacklist, somehow the page loads. Aside from that there no other..

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Fortinet FortiProxy?

My advice to others who are considering Fortinet FortiProxy is that it is seamless, easy to use, and quite straightfo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiProxy?

Fortinet FortiProxy is much cheaper compared to other products like Cisco, Palo Alto, and others. It is reasonably pr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Prisma Access Browser vs Check Point Harmony Browse

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony Browse

Compared 25% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Check Point Harmony Browse

Compared 24% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Check Point Harmony Browse

Compared 11% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Check Point Harmony Browse

Compared 7% of the time

More Check Point Harmony Browse Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Fortinet FortiProxy

Compared 25% of the time

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Fortinet FortiProxy

Compared 13% of the time

Blue Coat Secure Web Gateway Virtual Appliance vs Fortinet FortiProxy

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Web Security Appliance vs Fortinet FortiProxy

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Fortinet FortiProxy

Compared 2% of the time

More Fortinet FortiProxy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

May 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Browse

May 2026

Download Check Point Harmony Browse product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiProxy

May 2026

Download Fortinet FortiProxy product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

FortiProxy

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Check Point Harmony Browse enhances web browsing security by offering zero-day malware protection, phishing defense, and data loss prevention. It secures user credentials and blocks risky content in real-time through lightweight deployment.

Designed to protect against web-based threats like malware and ransomware, Check Point Harmony Browse filters web content, providing real-time threat analysis and browser isolation. It allows for secure browsing for remote employees without complex setups or the need for VPNs. While it effectively maintains data integrity and reduces downtime, it can enhance its offerings with detailed alerts, quicker updates, and improved integrations with iOS, Android, and third-party applications. Enhancing performance, reporting, language support, and pricing transparency can further benefit user experience.

What features define Check Point Harmony Browse?

Zero-Day Malware and Phishing Protection: Safeguards against unknown threats by detecting and neutralizing them instantly.
Data Loss Prevention: Ensures the security of sensitive data while browsing.
Real-Time Threat Analysis: Offers timely identification and mitigation of potential risks.
Browser Isolation: Segregates browsing activity to protect against breaches.
Lightweight Deployment: Simplifies installation and management without the need for VPNs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Security Incidents: Decreases the occurrence of successful cyber attacks.
Streamlined IT Management: Simplifies operational processes for IT teams.
Data Integrity Maintenance: Protects and preserves data during web interactions.
Minimal Downtime: Sustains continuous access and productivity.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Maximizes performance with low resource consumption.

In industries handling sensitive data or utilizing remote workforce models, Check Point Harmony Browse deployment strengthens online security strategies. Healthcare professionals ensure confidentiality while accessing patient data. Financial institutions prevent unauthorized access to client information. Educational entities use it to safeguard proprietary research and personal data of students and staff. These implementations tailor browser security to meet the intensive requirements of their fields, minimizing threats while optimizing performance.

Check Point Software Technologies

Fortinet FortiProxy provides simplicity and high performance with notable traffic inspections and user-friendly features. It integrates with security products to enhance threat intelligence, ensuring secure and efficient network management.

Fortinet FortiProxy is designed to enhance network security through exceptional traffic inspections, intrusion prevention, and antivirus capabilities. Its user-friendly nature allows for granular application and DNS control, deep packet inspection, and detailed access control. Administrators can implement precise policies to manage web access, integrating seamlessly with other security solutions. Offering proactive alarms and caching capabilities, FortiProxy optimizes bandwidth usage while ensuring robust network defense.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiProxy?

Traffic Inspections: High-performance inspection to secure web traffic.
Intrusion Prevention: Proactively detects and blocks threats.
Antivirus Profiles: Offers robust protection against viruses.
Application and DNS Control: Provides detailed control over applications and DNS settings.
Deep Packet Inspection: Ensures comprehensive inspection of packet content.
Access Control: Enables precise management of user access.

What benefits or ROI should users investigate?

Security Enhancement: Improved protection from web-based threats.
Network Efficiency: Optimized bandwidth through effective caching.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless interaction with other security products.
User-Friendly Management: Simplified administration with granular controls.

In industries focused on maintaining high-level internet security, Fortinet FortiProxy is employed for comprehensive traffic inspections and segmentation. It supports antivirus additions and secure connectivity, serving as a robust web security gateway. Organizations benefit from seamless authentication using Fortinet Single Sign-On, crucial for protecting users from threats and enabling efficient network operations.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy

April 2026

Free Report: Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony Browse vs. Fortinet FortiProxy report.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.