Catchpoint vs SysTrack comparison

Catchpoint and Lakeside Software are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Catchpoint is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Lakeside Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Catchpoint holds a 4.9% mindshare in DEM, compared to Lakeside Software’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lakeside Software users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

5,049 Views
858 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SysTrack

Read 11 SysTrack reviews

2,480 Views
2,480 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

SysTrack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Catchpoint and SysTrack both compete in IT performance and monitoring. Catchpoint appears more advantageous in terms of pricing and support, while SysTrack excels with its extensive feature set.

Features: Catchpoint provides transaction monitors on API and UI, an alert notification system, and an intuitive dashboard for monitoring user experience. SysTrack offers robust endpoint performance monitoring, user behavior analytics, and a comprehensive telemetry data collection feature.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could enhance its global monitoring capabilities, expand synthetic monitoring options, and improve real-time visibility features. SysTrack may benefit from simplifying its user interface, improving initial data integration processes, and providing more intuitive analytic tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is simple to deploy with helpful customer service support, allowing quick setup. SysTrack, though potentially complex in deployment, offers extensive resources and support for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint is competitively priced, offering a good ROI for essential performance monitoring needs. SysTrack, with higher setup costs, justifies its pricing through detailed analytics and efficient endpoint management ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. SysTrack Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (14th), Network Monitoring Software (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

SysTrack

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 4.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SysTrack is 7.5%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	4.9%
SysTrack	7.5%
Other	87.6%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

SumitKumar18

Senior SME at Microland Limited

Real-time monitoring and dashboards with cost-saving licensing

SysTrack requires significant improvements. Sometimes clients experience broken links where the service doesn't run on the user's machine, causing outdated data to display. For instance, a machine's last reboot might be inaccurately shown as seven days ago instead of two days ago. Additionally, real-time data syncing issues lead to delays, requiring this to be addressed, as data might be several hours old.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My advice to others who want to start using Catchpoint is that it's more useful for eCommerce businesses, and if you want to use it, it's a very, very helpful tool because it captures data from end-to-end."

"Catchpoint has positively impacted my organization because we have supported multiple customers and handled many escalations before they became critical issues."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"Catchpoint is actually catching issues before customers see them, since it's checking the sites every five minutes or even every minute, via the APIs."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"Overall, my experience with Catchpoint was really great, as it offers monitoring of performance, websites, APIs, and internet services for organizations."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

More Catchpoint pros

"We have got a good return on investment because it was able to deliver during the pandemic."

"The visualizer feature provides end-to-end analysis on all the machines."

"This is a great tool, but it's important that system admins have training on the product and use it regularly."

"I am impressed with the huge amount of information that you can get from the infrastructure."

"Cost-wise, SysTrack has a higher rate than other products, such as Nanoheal, but the features that SysTrack has aren't there in any other product available in the market."

"When a user calls in and says that they are having slowness issues, this tool has the capability to show exactly where the performance issue is. The Resolve feature that they have is very good. It is one of the main features. They are doing a pretty good job with the Resolve feature in terms of showing endpoint performance on various factors."

"It is a very powerful tool that will make your life easier."

"SysTrack is a BI solution for endpoints; we use it to understand the user experience at the company and user level."

More SysTrack pros

Cons

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature."

"I would love to have RAM monitoring available in Catchpoint, which would be a nice feature for both synthetic and real user monitoring, and it would be an amazing tool that I would love to have, complementing each other."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"Currently, Catchpoint is migrating to a new user interface. My colleagues and I feel that the old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"I believe the connection with Snowflake, AWS, and other new upcoming AI tools should be easier, especially the configuration with AI tools and LLMs."

"There is room for improvement in terms of enhancing user experience and maybe improving their technical expertise, which is why I chose eight out of ten."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

More Catchpoint cons

"Lacks flexibility with regard to licensing."

"A remote assistance tool is missing in SysTrack, and it could also be enhanced with the additional capabilities of creating customized self-healing sensors."

"Certain features haven't been tested sufficiently and don't work well."

"If they can integrate some kind of remote administration tool, like the LogMeIn tool, it would be helpful for the DDS team members, as well as for the global team members. We need not search for an additional tool for troubleshooting purposes. Currently, we are using one tool for governance and then we have SysTrack for monitoring the endpoints. There are two tools, and we are spending money on both."

"The interface needs to be improved because it looks ancient. If you have been working in IT for a long time, over 20 years, you might remember products from the start of your career that look almost identical to the way SysTrack looks now. The user interface is not user-friendly. When you first see the solution, it overwhelms you with everything. It's not easy to use, and it's not that intuitive."

"There are a lot of issues with the solution and certain features such as the survey feature and sensors, that don't work well and need to be improved."

"One thing from a layman's standpoint, the report should be very clear."

"SysTrack isn't stable enough. There are too many upgrades, and not all versions are stable."

More SysTrack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"If you compare cloud solutions to SysTrack, which is on-premises, then SysTrack is cheaper. If you compare the cost of SysTrack with that of other similar solutions, the cost is similar. For each master server, there's a license. In terms of end user devices, the licenses are sold in multiplications of 10. That's one upfront cost. Once you procure the license, you can use the software for as long as you like. The maintenance is sold on an annual basis. Additional costs are related to hosting and include a SQL server license and Windows server licenses."

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Cost-wise, SysTrack has a higher rate than other products, such as Nanoheal, but the features that SysTrack has aren't there in any other product available in the market."

"It is on a per-device basis. It is not on a per-user basis. I was not much engaged in the licensing piece. I was only a part of the conversation about how we are going to scale up or down, but its price, for sure, is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am not directly involved in pricing, but the pricing is very decent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Catchpoint can be improved by supporting some of the APIs and other technical testing with some kind of metric validations as well. I do not have anything more to add about the needed improvements,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use case for Catchpoint is mostly automating. I use Catchpoint automatically for automated monitoring of our various UIs and also the backend APIs. We rely on Chrome and Selenium and JavaSc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SysTrack?

SysTrack is considered an affordable solution. On a scale from one to ten, with ten being very cheap, I would rate it as an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SysTrack?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SysTrack?

SysTrack is a digital employee experience platform that we have deployed in our infrastructure without any customized requirements from the client side. Clients seek to reduce the number of service...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Nexthink vs SysTrack

Compared 44% of the time

ControlUp vs SysTrack

Compared 13% of the time

Alluvio Aternity vs SysTrack

Compared 11% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs SysTrack

Compared 5% of the time

More SysTrack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

August 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

SysTrack

July 2026

Download SysTrack product report

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

SysTrack offers comprehensive digital experience monitoring for IT environments like VDI and user devices. It provides valuable insights into performance, aiding service desk operations and improving efficiency through metrics tracking and data analysis.

Combining advanced tools for endpoint analysis and service optimization, SysTrack empowers organizations to enhance user experiences. Its features like Black Box, Resolve, and data capture improve performance insights, while virtual machine planning and incident mitigation streamline operations. Despite its robust toolkit, challenges exist in integration with third-party tools such as Dynatrace and Power BI. Users advocate for improved dashboards and centralized management consoles to optimize efficiency. Real-time data synchronization remains a focus area for future enhancements.

What are SysTrack's key features?

Black Box and Resolve: Provides critical insights to help diagnose performance issues.
GUI and Data Capture: Enhances endpoint analysis through detailed data collections.
Self-Help and Monitoring Dashboards: Assists service desk operations efficiently.
Virtual Machine Planning: Facilitates better infrastructure utilization and planning.
Automated Incident Mitigation: Streamlines the response to technical problems.
Infrastructure Insights: Aids in license management and cost-saving strategies.

What benefits and ROI should organizations expect?

Enhanced User Experience: Drives operational efficiency through better performance insights.
Reduced Service Desk Load: Enables fewer needed resources for support functions.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resources, reducing overall expenses.
Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Keeps operations smooth with continuous status updates.

SysTrack is widely adopted in industries needing to monitor digital employee experience within VDI environments. Organizations with large-scale deployments, such as those managing thousands of users, benefit significantly from its telemetry and infrastructure performance tracking capabilities. It supports reducing service-related challenges through its comprehensive analysis and proactive insights.

Lakeside Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

HONDA, TATA, General Mills, Ford, Kellogg's, Air Canada

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

August 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. SysTrack and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. SysTrack report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.