Carbonite Server vs Veritas NetBackup Appliance comparison

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"The solution is very stable."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The product enables me to recover the information of the appliances in the organization."

"The biggest advantage is that I do not need to manage backups on traditional tapes, which helps maintain total business continuity."

"NetBackup is based on really good architectural hardware, and Veritas has the best backup and replication technology in the world."

"We have good data backup coverage."

"The initial setup gets easier the more you do it."

"I personally find Veritas NetBackup Applicance hassle-free."

"The most valuable feature involves VMware Instant Recovery, which allows one to do restoration within seconds."

"They are a large company with good best practices, and they give good support."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"Our main challenge was deciding on the right capacity for expansion, but once we settled on two NAS servers with sixteen TB, things have been smooth."

"One area needing improvement is to facilitate Oracle database restores using the GUI on the NetBackup Appliance."

"The installation is cumbersome."

"Improving the interface could enhance user experience."

"The scalability could be improved."

"The costing part is on the higher side. The reporting could also be improved."

"The NetBackup software is based on Red Hat Linux, but we should have multiple software options for that. We should have more OS options. Also, there are too many tools and intermediaries. Everything should be built into an all-in-one solution."

"The monitoring could be a bit better."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Renewing subscriptions for appliance support is costly."

"Overall, Veritas is a good solution; the problem is the cost."

"The product is expensive and comes with a yearly license."

"The solution is not cheap"

"The price of Veritas NetBackup Appliance is competitive. There are different models of Veritas NetBackup Appliance, such as perpetual licenses and subscriptions. Having the choice is good."

"The licensing costs for this solution are very high."

"The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals."

"The licenses are purchased on appliances with the capacity they require."