You cannot compare a product to itself or the products you were comparing have been merged as this single product.

Carbonite Server vs NetVault Plus comparison

OpenText and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Quest Software is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quest Software’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,973 Views
2,702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

Read 15 NetVault Plus reviews

4,580 Views
3,527 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NetVault Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Carbonite Server and NetVault Plus compete in the data backup and recovery sector. NetVault Plus appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and scalability, potentially offering better long-term ROI despite its higher price.

Features: Carbonite Server provides strong data protection, secure backups, and quick recovery. It is known for platform support such as AIX and AS/400 Series. Users appreciate efficient granular restore features for SQL. NetVault Plus supports a wide range of databases like MSSQL, MySQL, Oracle, and SAP. It can restore to tape servers or external disks, offering rich reporting capabilities and easy backup search functions.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could enhance its advanced data management features and expand platform compatibility. Its deployment can be streamlined further for complex infrastructures. NetVault Plus would benefit from simplifying its setup process and reducing its recovery time of approximately 10 hours. Improving customer impact and enhancing the reporting interface can also be areas of focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server offers a straightforward deployment process and dependable customer support while NetVault Plus requires a more complex setup but compensates with responsive support services and effective deployment options, making it manageable across multiple systems.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server is favored for its affordable pricing and high potential ROI due to low initial costs. NetVault Plus, although more expensive, promises greater return over time through comprehensive features and scalability, positioning it as a strategic choice for complex IT environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (44th)

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

36th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetVault Plus	1.0%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Arno Wolthers

System Administrator at DIANA FEA BV

Reliable multi-platform backups have protected diverse servers and virtual libraries

Quest NetVault can improve in the area of Office 365 backups. Two years ago, I purchased the Office 365 plug-in or leased it for a year, and I have never been able to have a solid backup of Office 365 using Quest NetVault. I have resorted to a different solution specifically for Office 365 backups. It is not that it never works, but it fails so many times that it is not production-ready. On a weekly basis, I encounter problems and have to restart jobs or figure out what is wrong and then run it again. It simply needs to run as all the other Quest NetVault jobs do. If tomorrow there was a brand new Quest NetVault and I had the option to add something to make my life easier, besides improving the Office 365 backup, I would like to see that Quest Co Store products should be a part of Quest NetVault. They work and interact, but I have the impression it should be one solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The solution is very stable."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"The main reason I decided to use Quest NetVault was the support for many different platforms."

"Ultimately, our customers have been happy with the solution."

"We have contacted technical support and they've been very good."

"NetVault is good for every kind of workload and the backup is very robust."

"NetVault Plus's Unified Manager Console is useful, it is great actually, and helps with the day-to-day activity for my end, making it easier for an IT manager like me."

"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

More NetVault Plus pros

Cons

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

More Carbonite Server cons

"There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"NetVault does not have the feature set that Commvault has."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"There's no positive impact that NetVault Plus has brought to my company; I mean, there's no particular benefit I have seen from using it."

"Veeam is the product that I can compare to NetVault Plus. I think Veeam Backup is better for VMware backup."

More NetVault Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The tool is expensive."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My use cases for Quest NetVault involve one backup server, which has a Windows-based server with a lot of disks attached. On these disks, I have a virtual type library, and the system also has acce...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs NetVault Plus

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 4% of the time

Rubrik vs NetVault Plus

Compared 3% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

July 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

July 2026

Download NetVault Plus product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus

August 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NetVault Plus report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.