Carbonite Server vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Even though a lot of other people like Veeam, Tivoli's restoration and infrastructure are unbeatable, making them the only ones that we rely on despite other feasible options."

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"We rarely need to reach out to customer service; however, when we do, they have not been able to help us resolve a single call."

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."