We performed a comparison between Camunda and Tungsten TotalAgility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"It has an open BPM"
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"The solution is good for data models."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"Now it has an OCR, optical character recognition, engine where it can extract data from the document."
"Kofax TotalAgility is a great design tool for reading handwritten invoices."
"It's not so complex to design what you need to."
"Great with recognition providing a high level of confidence."
"Data extraction and auto-classification are great features."
"Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding."
"One feature I like is that it makes the matrix easy for an unstructured document."
"Essentially, Kofax TotalAgility as a whole is quite nice. As of now, we've only been able to use and explore its document classification and extraction capabilities. We haven't explored and used the case management capability yet, but the scan and capture capabilities we've been using heavily and those are quite good. Our solutions are mainly around those areas of Kofax TotalAgility. We haven't explored the product a lot, but the capabilities we've explored are good."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"They provide sufficient but not excellent technical support. Perhaps there is a point where they could use some improvement."
"The one thing I would like to see more of right now: is a simplified form creation. That would be the most significant improvement I would like to see in their product."
"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
"It would be nice if the tool has more connectors to different systems. It is an expensive solution."
"The product's console version is old. It should also improve its forum."
"The pricing for Kofax TotalAgility could be more attractive, particularly the cloud version of the solution which was offered to my company. This is its area for improvement."
"Kofax should improve its handwritten extractions."
"TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 68 reviews while Tungsten TotalAgility is ranked 4th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 22 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Tungsten TotalAgility is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten TotalAgility writes "Great with recognition and provides a high level of confidence in terms of extraction capabilities". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Tungsten TotalAgility is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, OpenText Intelligent Capture, UiPath Document Understanding, Hyland Brainware and Instabase.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.