We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"The performance is very good."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The performance is good."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"The installation is difficult."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"It should be a faster device."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.