Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN compete in the wireless LAN solutions market. Cisco Meraki has an advantage due to its cloud-managed solutions and centralized management, while Cambium Networks stands out with its cost-effectiveness and stability without licensing constraints.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized cloud management, high security features, and extensive management tools. It is valued for its ease in configuration and monitoring capabilities across varied organizational sizes. Cambium Networks is known for its stability, ease of configuration, and autonomy from controllers and licenses, making it suitable for customizable environments.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could enhance its licensing flexibility and integration capabilities, and expand the depth of technical support. Cambium Networks would benefit from better scalability, more efficient cloud configuration options, and improved pricing models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki provides flexible deployment options in cloud and on-premises setups with varying quality of technical support. Cambium Networks offers consistent and accessible support praised for its straightforward initial setup.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki's costs are tied to frequent license renewals, making it expensive with strong ROI in management ease and scalability. Cambium Networks offers a cost-effective option without ongoing license fees, providing favorable total cost of ownership and positive long-term ROI.
They were always available when needed, which we appreciated.
The local team helps with issues primarily, and if they can't resolve them, they connect to the technical support team in the US, who are very much trained on resolving issues and providing support.
Cisco's support is very good and ranks 10 out of 10.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
Ruckus provides better area coverage and interference withstanding capacity.
Allowing deployment of fewer access points while covering more area.
I can add devices to my inventory and assign them to a new network, and it is for the most part automated and fairly quick.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
I believe the hardware used in Cambium Networks is pretty robust, and the radios are strong in terms of signal and performance.
In the last six months, we have never had any issues.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Cambium currently lacks such extensive analytics capabilities.
I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products.
Channel management required manual intervention, especially in environments with multiple floors, leading to potential signal interference issues.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
I believe Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can be improved by implementing enhancements to the Cisco AI assistant.
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
Even though people said Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper, I assumed it was cheaper at one point, but they changed the way how subscription works, and there is no difference compared with Meraki at the moment.
Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced, comparable and not the most expensive nor the cheapest option available.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
It would be more competitive if Meraki would consider reducing the price or extending SD-WAN features to wireless devices.
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
Meraki products are better than Cambium Networks Wireless LAN because the quality of the Wi-Fi is better, and it is easier to manage.
The product was scalable, allowing for fewer access points to cover more area, and supported a high number of clients.
Ruckus offers a more extensive coverage range and has better capacity to withstand interference, which I have experienced with Ruckus products.
The capability to configure network policies remotely is the most important aspect for our organization, as we are an MSP providing remote support for all our clients.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
When I am troubleshooting wireless connections, I have access to detailed client statistics regarding disconnects, RF channel information, and other relevant data.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 9.7% |
| Cambium Networks Wireless LAN | 2.0% |
| Other | 88.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides seamless connectivity with user-friendly setup, robust hardware, and controllerless operation. It offers cloud management, stable coverage, and remote management, supporting diverse environments with advanced features.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN features an autonomous architecture eliminating dependency, efficient support, and regular updates enhancing functionality. Users benefit from easy configuration, flexibility with band changes, and no licensing hassle. Advanced capabilities like spectrum analyzing and point-to-multipoint connections ensure effective operations in sectors like hospitality, education, and government. While it excels in stable and wide coverage with high capacity, scalability, and extensive deployment support, areas like capacity, coverage, and efficiency in large spaces could see enhancements. Pricing and bandwidth management comparisons with other competitors are key points to consider.
What are the key features of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?Deployed in sectors such as hospitality, education, and government, Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is instrumental in creating public Wi-Fi systems, enhancing backhaul infrastructure, and facilitating hybrid setup projects. Its centralized management makes it accessible to non-experts, suitable for restaurants, hotels, hospitals, conferences, educational campuses, and remote monitoring areas.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.
What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
