CA Deliver vs QlikView comparison

Broadcom and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Broadcom is ranked #34, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

CA Deliver

Read 3 CA Deliver reviews

170 Views
170 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 163 QlikView reviews

3,425 Views
1,952 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Deliver

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and CA Deliver operate in different technology domains but have overlapping use cases in enterprise solutions. QlikView often appears advantageous due to its strong analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: QlikView offers data integration, dynamic dashboards, and real-time analysis. In-memory data processing further distinguishes its analytics efficiency. CA Deliver's strengths include reliable large-volume document deliveries, automated workflows, and comprehensive distribution solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView allows for straightforward implementation and rapid deployment which minimizes time to operational status. CA Deliver has an intricate deployment process, but it offers extensive support which is beneficial for enterprises with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView provides flexible pricing options and rapid ROI through its quick analytical insights and decision support systems. CA Deliver might require a higher initial investment due to substantial infrastructure needs; however, it promises long-term ROI by improving document management efficiency, offering a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Deliver vs. QlikView Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Deliver

Ranking in Reporting

34th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of CA Deliver is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 4.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QlikView	4.4%
CA Deliver	0.4%
Other	95.2%

Reporting

Featured Reviews

it_user837525

Senior Systems Engineer (Sr. level II) at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Gives us one repository for various output formats and retention periods

A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. Much like other technology companies that have fallen into this trap, let feature and compatibly releases be controlled by the technical group, instead of the marketing and/or management people. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not. I have been doing this for 37 years and see it all too often, sometimes to the detriment of the company itself (Storage Technology Corp. and its Iceberg array comes to mind).

Read full review

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

Rapid development and flexibility transform commercial decision-making processes

In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI, considering that you're losing a lot of customers to Power BI. Reducing costs is the main improvement needed, as this is the biggest burden currently faced in the South African market, with Microsoft converting QlikView customers due to the perceived cost reduction. I am aware of several big corporations, such as Sanofi and Aspen Pharmacare, which have left QlikView due to cost issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."

"Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."

"The in-memory feature gives us better insight. It's also easy to drill down into the information and select information."

"QlikView is a scalable solution that multiple users can easily use."

"Our Qlikview applications help us to get a good idea of our Client Base Performance and assist us in the decision making for Seasonal Specials. On the other hand QlikView helps us to get a grasp on our Suppliers and helps us to negotiate pricing with them."

"E-T-L, The Extract, Transform, and Loading capabilities of QlikView make it a highly sophisticated self-service business intelligence tool for developers and analysts."

"You can switch views easily."

"It enables us to configure various elements, such as dashboard settings, including factors like color schemes and other customization parameters."

"It is useful to use a tool like this to have a view of data at a point in time. You can extract and create little data sets that you can store, and then over time, you can have a view for tracking changes. Especially when you work with a relational database or a database that's a production database, the data is dynamic, but if you use QlikView, you can take a snapshot of different datasets. In your own time, you can then get insights and report, build, analyze, and draw whatever you need from the data, which is quite useful."

"It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."

"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."

"I would like to see more advanced features from Qlik Sense integrated into QlikView to keep it competitive and up-to-date."

"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of a feature that would allow us to add a common library of (our) commands used in load scripts and expressions, so with a keyword, we would get a drop down to select the command we are looking for, as opposed to the generic help."

"For me, it is important to have a mix, what is the "view" and what is the "sense", Qlik Sense. They have two tools, but for me it is important to have only one tool, which combines the functions that we have from one side and the other side."

"The user interface is old."

"There is a lack of static PDF report generation and automatic resizing of the dashboard to fit the device."

"Although Qliktech's road map clearly states that QlikView has a long way to go, most of the R&D effort seems to be benefiting Qlik Sense."

"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."

"I would want them to have more options as a user. It would be nice for them to create their own dashboards and add fields."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable, licensing model suitable for large enterprises."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"QlikView is a reasonably priced solution."

"The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."

"Its licensing costs are moderate, but it can get expensive due to the numerous add-ons available like those for printing."

"The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."

"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	76

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only t...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 9% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 7% of the time

Domo vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

December 2025

Download CA Deliver product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

December 2025

Download QlikView product report

Overview

CA Deliver is an online report management system that provides you with tools to manage and reduce the cost of report distribution. Able to be utilized by itself or in conjunction with other enterprise report management solutions from CA Technologies, CA Deliver uses the power of the mainframe to automate the day-to-day report management functions of distribution, tracking and printing.

Broadcom

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

ERGO

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

December 2025

Free Report: CA Deliver vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Deliver vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Deliver vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.