CA Deliver vs QlikView comparison

Broadcom and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Broadcom is ranked #45, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

CA Deliver

Read 3 CA Deliver reviews

77 Views
13 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 161 QlikView reviews

1,651 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Deliver

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and CA Deliver operate in different technology domains but have overlapping use cases in enterprise solutions. QlikView often appears advantageous due to its strong analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: QlikView offers data integration, dynamic dashboards, and real-time analysis. In-memory data processing further distinguishes its analytics efficiency. CA Deliver's strengths include reliable large-volume document deliveries, automated workflows, and comprehensive distribution solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView allows for straightforward implementation and rapid deployment which minimizes time to operational status. CA Deliver has an intricate deployment process, but it offers extensive support which is beneficial for enterprises with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView provides flexible pricing options and rapid ROI through its quick analytical insights and decision support systems. CA Deliver might require a higher initial investment due to substantial infrastructure needs; however, it promises long-term ROI by improving document management efficiency, offering a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Deliver vs. QlikView Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Deliver

Ranking in Reporting

45th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of CA Deliver is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting

Featured Reviews

it_user346092

Senior Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It's in essence a digital bank that keep customer information for 40 to 50 years, accessible 24/7.

It’s an archiving solution with all the support of CA. All your customer data flows through it, from their names to all their other details The benefits are that it keeps their information for over 40 to 50 years, so in essence it's a digital bank for customer information. This means that the…

Read full review

Arjun Meda

Assistant Vice President at HSBC India

Useful for data visualization and business intelligence

Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."

"Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."

"The most valuable aspect is its extensive library on Microsoft, providing a robust framework for implementation."

"QlikView is one of the strongest tools, I would say. Also, it has a very vast capability to process the data"

"It is a stable product."

"Associative model - no more cubes."

"Scripting as per a customer's need, which is a pretty cool feature and not available in other tools."

"We can scale it if we need to."

"On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL."

"QlikView is a scalable solution that multiple users can easily use."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."

"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."

"More/newer visualisation components need to be added."

"The user interface is old."

"Enhancing user-friendliness would be highly beneficial."

"The solution should be mobile-responsive. It should also include drag-and-drop and slice-and-dice features."

"They could improve the update time."

"Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times."

"The product's visual capabilities could be improved. The graphs and visualizations are not as aesthetic or easy to create."

"QlikView is probably on the pricier side than other BI tools."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable, licensing model suitable for large enterprises."

"Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."

"It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."

"It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."

"I rate QlikView's pricing a five out of ten."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."

"The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."

"It is expensive for small companies."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

April 2025

Download CA Deliver product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

April 2025

Download QlikView product report

Overview

CA Deliver is an online report management system that provides you with tools to manage and reduce the cost of report distribution. Able to be utilized by itself or in conjunction with other enterprise report management solutions from CA Technologies, CA Deliver uses the power of the mainframe to automate the day-to-day report management functions of distribution, tracking and printing.

Broadcom

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

ERGO

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

April 2025

Free Report: CA Deliver vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Deliver vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Deliver vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.