Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Deliver vs QlikView comparison

Broadcom and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Broadcom is ranked #43, while Qlik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.
CA Deliver
Read 3 CA Deliver reviews
  • 114 Views
  • 114 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
QlikView
Read 162 QlikView reviews
  • 3,168 Views
  • 1,806 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and CA Deliver operate in different technology domains but have overlapping use cases in enterprise solutions. QlikView often appears advantageous due to its strong analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: QlikView offers data integration, dynamic dashboards, and real-time analysis. In-memory data processing further distinguishes its analytics efficiency. CA Deliver's strengths include reliable large-volume document deliveries, automated workflows, and comprehensive distribution solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView allows for straightforward implementation and rapid deployment which minimizes time to operational status. CA Deliver has an intricate deployment process, but it offers extensive support which is beneficial for enterprises with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView provides flexible pricing options and rapid ROI through its quick analytical insights and decision support systems. CA Deliver might require a higher initial investment due to substantial infrastructure needs; however, it promises long-term ROI by improving document management efficiency, offering a strategic investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Deliver vs. QlikView Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Deliver vs. QlikView
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Deliver
Ranking in Reporting
43rd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QlikView
Ranking in Reporting
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
162
Ranking in other categories
Embedded BI (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of CA Deliver is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 4.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Reporting Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QlikView4.7%
CA Deliver0.1%
Other95.2%
Reporting
 

Featured Reviews

it_user837525 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives us one repository for various output formats and retention periods
A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. Much like other technology companies that have fallen into this trap, let feature and compatibly releases be controlled by the technical group, instead of the marketing and/or management people. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not. I have been doing this for 37 years and see it all too often, sometimes to the detriment of the company itself (Storage Technology Corp. and its Iceberg array comes to mind).
Read full review
Arjun Meda - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for data visualization and business intelligence
Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."
"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."
"The initial setup is not very complex."
"You can do a lot of things on the back end which are not possible in the other solutions on the market."
"QlikView is one of the strongest tools, I would say. Also, it has a very vast capability to process the data"
"It enables us to configure various elements, such as dashboard settings, including factors like color schemes and other customization parameters."
"This is a very cool application with endless options of creativity and visuals."
"The platform's most valuable feature is its associative data model. It allows me to discover hidden data and gain insights that are not immediately visible."
"The most useful feature of QlikView for me is the QVD concept."
"Easy to analyze data by click-through."
More QlikView pros
 

Cons

"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."
"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."
"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."
"Installation and deployment could be made easier and quicker."
"The solution should be mobile-responsive. It should also include drag-and-drop and slice-and-dice features."
"They could provide a user-friendly analysis process rather than specialized IT resource code."
"The only thing I would improve about it is the fact that it refreshes all the time, and when it does that, it just deletes all the options you had, all the filters that you had selected, so you need to select them from the beginning."
"Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time."
"Sometimes, dealing with complex reports requires more effort, which could be really improved."
"Although Qliktech's road map clearly states that QlikView has a long way to go, most of the R&D effort seems to be benefiting Qlik Sense."
More QlikView cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"​Pricing is reasonable, licensing model suitable for large enterprises."
"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."
"The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."
"It is quite expensive, rating at around nine out of ten on a cost scale."
"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."
"QlikView is a reasonably priced solution."
"I rate QlikView's pricing a five out of ten."
"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."
"It is expensive for small companies."
More QlikView pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user79932 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2015
Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho
1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise75
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QlikView?
If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually, and since we are South African-based, that needs to be multiplied.
See all answers
What needs improvement with QlikView?
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView Logo
Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView Logo
Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView
Compared 14% of the time
Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView Logo
Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView
Compared 9% of the time
MicroStrategy vs QlikView Logo
MicroStrategy vs QlikView
Compared 6% of the time
IBM Cognos vs QlikView Logo
IBM Cognos vs QlikView
Compared 5% of the time
More QlikView Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Reporting
September 2025
CA Deliver reportDownload CA Deliver product report
Buyer's Guide
QlikView
September 2025
QlikView reportDownload QlikView product report
 

Overview

CA Deliver is an online report management system that provides you with tools to manage and reduce the cost of report distribution. Able to be utilized by itself or in conjunction with other enterprise report management solutions from CA Technologies, CA Deliver uses the power of the mainframe to automate the day-to-day report management functions of distribution, tracking and printing.
Broadcom

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik
 

Sample Customers

ERGO
Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
Buyer's Guide
CA Deliver vs. QlikView
September 2025
Free Report: CA Deliver vs. QlikView
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Deliver vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Deliver vs. QlikView report.
See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.