We performed a comparison between CA Deliver and Domo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting."Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."
"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."
"The ability to create custom connectors was useful because you never know, with customers, what platform they want to utilize or what data they have. It gave us a lot of flexibility in being able to bring data in from different places."
"I mostly see it as an ETL which has many system connectors. It does a good job of ETL."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature and allows for customization to create and share reports."
"This solution allows us to change our performance metrics and tracks our goals in real-time."
"It has the best GUI. And it already has an ETL tool embedded in it..."
"With ETL transformations in SQL lists, you often write a lot of queries. You have to build a bunch of code for the data. With Domo, one of the pieces we have is Magic ETL. In Magic ETL, you don't need to write code. You don't need to be a specialist in SQL or any database query language."
"The dashboarding itself was pretty easy. So both the front and the back end were positive in this case."
"The ETL tools they have in Redshift are pretty awesome... I can work in Redshift to get the data from AWS and work in Redshift, in Domo, to create Transforms and the data structure we need..."
"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."
"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."
"Domo or any other BI tool has room for improvement, in particular, in the calculations. User-guided material isn't available for calculations. The tool, though user-friendly, could also be more customizable, especially when you're building a dashboard. Data integration could also be improved in Domo because even if the tool connects to multiple data sources, some hiccups still arise and need to be addressed."
"They should include service-based reporting features."
"When you're exporting a graph out of Domo — suppose it is in the form of a donut chart or it is in form of a stack — the data comes out in tabular format, not as a graph. When exporting the data, I would like them to create a tab for graphs and another tab with the data in tabular format."
"I would like to publish a dashboard for the employees so that they can also see the performance of our organization. But that is not a feature in Domo, although it's something that Zoho provided."
"There were very few cases on some of the tables, the data tables, where I wish there was an additional feature or two."
"One of the improvements that could be made is related to improved storage options."
"Their STK is not up to date and you can't access it on their website. They have a private STK to access resources in Domo."
"I would like to be able to drill down more when there is a particular area where there is a problem. I don't clearly see that in Domo at the moment."
Earn 20 points
CA Deliver is ranked 42nd in Reporting while Domo is ranked 6th in Reporting with 35 reviews. CA Deliver is rated 9.6, while Domo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA Deliver writes "Gives us one repository for various output formats and retention periods". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Domo writes "Robust, powerful, and easy to use". CA Deliver is most compared with , whereas Domo is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Databricks, Looker and Amazon QuickSight.
See our list of best Reporting vendors.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
