CA CEM [EOL] vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 91% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution.

CA CEM [EOL]

Read 1 CA CEM [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 277 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

40,714 Views
30,943 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CA CEM [EOL]

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

CA CEM [EOL] and Splunk AppDynamics compete in the application performance management category. Splunk AppDynamics appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall offering.

Features: CA CEM [EOL] focuses on network-based application monitoring, emphasizing end-user experience through detailed transaction analysis. Splunk AppDynamics offers a comprehensive APM suite, including real-time application monitoring, application mapping, and robust capabilities for complex environments. Splunk AppDynamics is more feature-rich and appeals to businesses that need extensive functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA CEM [EOL] provides straightforward deployment but may require additional support due to a learning curve. Splunk AppDynamics offers a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive guides and support, allowing quicker implementation. Splunk AppDynamics provides superior ease of deployment and customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CA CEM [EOL] generally offers a lower initial setup cost, appealing to price-sensitive businesses. Splunk AppDynamics, while higher priced, is seen as a better long-term investment with greater ROI potential due to its extensive capabilities. Splunk AppDynamics often delivers better value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA CEM [EOL]

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

277

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user305787

Tech Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs.

It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance We've found that it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs. It's difficult to segregate…

Read full review

Shamim Alsharif

Performance Test Engineer at TANIM CONSULTING, LLC

Real-time monitoring has improved our banking API performance and supports detailed business transaction analysis

The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related. It's real-time monitoring of performance of each of the components, which is what we need and use all the time. It's highly effective, I would say. Infrastructure visibility, transaction monitoring, to check the actual user experience in terms of the response time, MRT and all those things. We do the component monitoring like the API performance and the connections and all those things, but we also do the business process monitoring and business transaction monitoring.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance."

"We switched to AppDynamics for its capabilities."

"We decided to invest in AppDynamics because we wanted to move from being reactionary to being proactive, that's really what it comes down to."

"The best feature of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is that it lets you find errors in synthetic jobs ahead of the users. The solution shows you all front-end metrics. You can also see JavaScript errors and jQuery errors through AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring. You can also do a correlation between the front end and the backend, or from the user to the navigator, to the backend through the solution."

"Quicker turnaround on finding/resolving issues or improving performance, which leads to improved client experiences."

"The key benefits it offers us are that it helps us know the infrastructure and performance issues, as well as if a customer is experiencing latency issues, ahead of time so we can act on them proactively and improve the customer experience."

"I like that AppDynamics allows every organization to have what they want to see, like for my organization, we're able to customize the dashboard to show us details of what we want to see in our transactions."

"AppDynamics is the best fit as an Application Performance Management solution."

"Splunk AppDynamics has positively impacted our organization by changing how the team works with quick reaction times, so when we look at alerts and identify their types, it has reduced our response from hours to merely minutes, enabling us to analyze alerts quickly."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"In our experience, technical support has been slow. We’ve been plagued with hardware issues, which have been on-going for a long time and which is going through CA to a separate partner, who then needs to deal with another local partner company for hardware."

"If we consider the implementation of alternative solutions, such as Dynatrace, there is a notable difference in the approach to agent-based service monitoring. For instance, Dynatrace employs a single-agent solution, which can pose security concerns. When installing Dynatrace, granting the agent ld pro payload rights is a requirement. In contrast, our solution ensures a more secure approach by not requiring root and administration access. While we currently utilize an agent-based solution, there may be a shift in the next one or two years, possibly with the adoption of Open Telemetry. It's anticipated that many APM vendors, including Dynatrace, may alter their structure or strategy for implementation. However, as of now, the trend is towards an increasing number of implementations daily."

"Customer support takes time. Whenever we face any issues, we have to open the vendor case and then there will be back and forth happening."

"As an administrator, I would love to be able to manage the update of agents from the controller itself."

"When you have high stress of visits I do not know if you are more stress because of the amount of visits or because you have to wait eternal 60 seconds to find out it things are going well or you already have mess."

"Part of it is support for more modern languages. Node is lagging behind."

"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring could improve the price of the solution, it is costly."

"Customer service is 3/10."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It could be a bit lower, but looking at the scalability, functionality, and other things, you can understand why AppDynamics is so expensive as compared to some of the cheaper products that don't have that full single pane of glass they've got. Dynatrace has got three different elements that you need to log into just to get a full view, which is not so good, and because of that, it is a bit cheaper."

"The license for AppDynamics is procured by our customers."

"The tool is expensive."

"It does require licensing to be paid."

"There is an annual cost to use this solution. The licensing model could be improved by making it more cost-effective."

"The solution is highly expensive"

"The product is a bit expensive compared to other tools."

"It would be better if there were more solutions incorporated into the base price. "

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

21%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	64
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	207

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Server Monitoring?

One area for improvement regarding OpenTelemetry and open-source aspects is that Splunk AppDynamics lacks credibility in open-source collectors, where we do not have full line of sight. OpenTelemet...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AppDynamics Server Monitoring?

Splunk AppDynamics serves as our main solution for end-to-end application performance management, and we conduct a certain level of digital experience monitoring as well. We ensure that customer vi...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC TrueSight vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Diagnostics vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Dynatrace vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Monitor vs CA CEM [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More CA CEM [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download CA CEM [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

October 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

CEM

No data available

Overview

CA Customer Experience Manager (CA CEM) is a product within the Application Performance Management solution that measures web application performance for each individual customer. CA CEM measures the performance and quality of customer transactions, identifies defects and variance, and quantifies the impact on customers and the business. CA CEM lets you monitor real user activities -- including login, account update, or purchase transactions -- at the business service level. By proactively detecting trends in degraded customer transaction response times and providing various actionable reports, CA CEM lets you act before problems occur or SLAs are out of compliance. These capabilities enable both your business managers and IT staff to understand and resolve performance problems before end users call for support.

Broadcom

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

First Horizon National Corporation, Olympus, Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago LimitedŒ _Petrotrinî, Racing and Wagering Western Australia

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.