BrowserStack vs froglogic Squish comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
8,712 views|6,797 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
froglogic Logo
3,426 views|1,686 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and froglogic Squish based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. froglogic Squish Report (Updated: July 2023).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found that BrowserStack is stable.""BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile.""The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful.""The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.""Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable.""It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering.""The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing.""The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

More BrowserStack Pros →

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac.""I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results.""I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like.""froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

More froglogic Squish Pros →

Cons
"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms.""We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues.""I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product.""BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally.""While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA.""It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience.""BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster.""BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

More BrowserStack Cons →

"The price could be better.""ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class.""I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved.""There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

More froglogic Squish Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
  • "It is expensive."
  • More froglogic Squish Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:With respect to pricing, they are a bit expensive. I would rate the licensing model a six out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. So, the price could be a bit decreased.
    Top Answer:The issue with the product stems from the fact that when we try to do a single or multiple login on multiple browsers for simulation in scenarios where users use Chrome, Mozilla, and Edge, all… more »
    Top Answer:I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool… more »
    Top Answer:I use Froglogic Squish for desktop UI testing.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    6,797
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    11th
    Views
    3,426
    Comparisons
    1,686
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

    Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

    Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

    Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

    The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

    • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
    • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
    • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
    • Eclipse-based IDE
    • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
    • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
    • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
    • testing capabilities
    • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
    • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface
    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    BrowserStack vs. froglogic Squish
    July 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: July 2023.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BrowserStack is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 24 reviews while froglogic Squish is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while froglogic Squish is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar, whereas froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Test, Katalon Studio and Tricentis Tosca. See our BrowserStack vs. froglogic Squish report.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.