We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."We receive good transactions from it with good graphs, as well, documenting the activities of total visitors on the site. We can pull the reports and provide them to the client, as required."
"Some of its valuable features include transaction traces, dashboards, and metric grouping to see combined data."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"In terms of stability, it has been stable so far."
"I have found Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to be scalable."
"The deep-process instrumentation gave us an opportunity to understand application process performance in detail."
"The deployment was easy."
"The way these tools show the information is very useful. this is a tool that records information from Java and .NET applications, and obtain information about how many times an method has been call in a period of time (usually 30 sec), how many times respond in this span of time or is delayed or stall."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"Issue resolution needs to be faster, rather than having users wait for the next release for issues to be fixed."
"There is no auto flow diagram, and the alert mechanism is not as good when compared to other tools."
"Stability could actually be helped because it is a wrapper or an agent on our system. If we are having a bad day in production or if other resources are being utilized, then we will get get gaps in our monitoring system."
"Dashboards need to be improved in order to make them self-explanatory."
"Our users lag how to identify the root cause with this solution. If they could come up with a more user-friendly version, that would be a good thing, since other vendors currently have better features and more user-friendly products than CA APM."
"Needs the ability to dynamically create dashboards. Right now, we do custom dashboards. Everything is created manually."
"Java Console uses too much memory."
"Needs custom dashboards."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 25th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
