"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"It does everything we wanted it to do."
"JVM memory monitoring and connection pool monitoring are valuable features."
"The most valuable features are the low overhead, the ability to monitor production on 24/7 principle, the ability to decrease time to discover the point of failure in the IT infrastructure or the application environment in a short period of time, reporting for analyzing the performance of the application for improving the code optimizing process."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is its user interface."
"The configuration and the manager tool are good features."
"Deep Dive and Transaction Analysis Triage capability."
"I like that it gives you a wide range of data where you can see the application outage response from concurrent locations and the number of stalled jobs."
"The features that I find most valuable are related to network monitoring."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"Datadog is constantly adding new features."
"Datadog has given us near-live visibility across our entire cloud platform."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboards that are provided out of the box, as well as ones we were able to configure."
"The solution is sufficiently stable."
"The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment."
"Because of our client focus, it is easy for us to sell. This is because it is easy to use and easy to set up."
"There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well. It is not able to record information with the application server. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. It should be a little bit easier and cheaper. Because it is pretty difficult and expensive, many customers don't take it."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"It would be nice if there were pre-made dashboards."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"They can make it easier to configure."
"The technical support is very poor."
"Lacks some integration between all the tools."
"It doesn't have a proper database, and the configuration is very difficult."
"With respect to SQL monitoring, it would be nice to have a little more information because it doesn't provide the full statement all of the time."
"User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment."
"Support could be much better."
"Issue resolution needs to be faster, rather than having users wait for the next release for issues to be fixed."
"I found the solution to be stable, I did not experience any bugs or glitches. However, some of the managing team did."
"Once agents are connected to the Datadog portal, we should be able to upgrade them quickly."
"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."
"The error traceability is an area that can be improved."
"I'm still exploring the trial version, and it is fine. One thing that I haven't been able to figure out is how to retrieve a report. This is something that could be improved. I probably need to navigate to a place to access the reports."
"I think better access to their engineers when we have a problem could be better."
"Datadog lacks a deeper application-level insight. Their competitors had eclipsed them in offering ET functionality that was important to us. That's why we stopped using it and switched to New Relic. Datadog's price is also high."
"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."
New Relic is a software analytics and application performance management solution that gives users in-depth data visibility and analytics. By going right to the source, the code, New Relic enables users to develop quicker software, build improved products,and consistently impress their customers. Data tells a story and New Relic interprets what it is telling you.
CA Application Performance Management (CA APM) is the solution global brands trust to proactively identify and resolve performance and availability issues across physical, virtual, cloud, and mobile applications. Patent-pending analytics provides expertise in the form of guided assisted triage workflows for in-depth, root-cause diagnostics across development and production applications, simplifying and speeding the time it takes to find and fix issues.
CA APM scales to your organization’s needs and automatically correlates multiple sources of data to help you sort through the data and act decisively, helping to improve user experience and application performance.
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 11th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 12 reviews while Datadog is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 33 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 7.2, while Datadog is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Has high pricing, needs better stability and requires more reliable ML/AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Provides insightful analytics and good visibility that assist with making architectural decisions". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, BMC TrueSight Operations Management, Splunk and Alluvio Aternity , whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, Splunk, Elastic Security and Amazon CloudWatch. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.