Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

Broadcom and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zeenyx is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0. Broadcom holds a 3.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 645 Views
  • 374 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews
  • 548 Views
  • 110 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Zeenyx AscentialTest and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer compete in the testing and requirements designing domain. Based on user reviews, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has the upper hand in features and overall user satisfaction, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is praised for its pricing and support.

Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest users value its robust automation capabilities, intuitive test management features, and ease of use. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is known for comprehensive functionalities in managing requirements, creating test cases efficiently, and versatile feature offerings.

Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest users suggest enhancements in integration options, scalability, and reporting functionalities. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer users note that setup can be complex, the learning curve is steep, and performance optimization is needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest is favored for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer poses challenges in deployment and its customer service can be slow.

Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest is cost-effective and offers quicker ROI, attractive to budget-conscious buyers. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has a higher price tag, but users feel its advanced features justify the cost over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.
Sentiment score
7.3
Zeenyx AscentialTest boosts productivity, reduces costs, and improves project outcomes through intuitive design, automated testing, and enhanced test coverage.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.
Sentiment score
9.2
Zeenyx AscentialTest customer service is praised for its prompt, knowledgeable support, efficiently resolving issues and ensuring smooth user experiences.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in handling large-scale testing efficiently, supporting numerous users and test cases without performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zeenyx AscentialTest is praised for its stability, reliability, and bug resistance, making it ideal for diverse testing needs.
 

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.
Users find Zeenyx AscentialTest's reporting, integration, stability, and documentation inadequate, with a steep learning curve for new users.
 

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.
<p>Zeenyx AscentialTest offers cost-effective, scalable pricing with annual and perpetual licenses, suitable for both small teams and large organizations.</p>
 

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.
Zeenyx AscentialTest is praised for its ease of use, powerful automation, flexibility, detailed reporting, and reliable performance.
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (7th), Test Design Automation (3rd)
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation
I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.
Read full review
Tobias Roth - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration
The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
27%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
8%
Healthcare Company
21%
Government
15%
University
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...
See all answers
What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?
AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?
While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?
We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 25% of the time
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 23% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 17% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 14% of the time
Jama Connect vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Jama Connect vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 11% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest
Compared 100% of the time
More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
August 2025
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Zeenyx AscentialTest reportDownload Zeenyx AscentialTest product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
AscentialTest
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom
AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Zeenyx
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.